8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3,342. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,429–15,773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 07:23
15,272
+45
12 Aug 2026, 23:55
15,227
+20
11 Aug 2026, 22:22
15,207
+84
10 Aug 2026, 20:02
15,123
+728
9 Aug 2026, 18:21
14,395
+1,801
8 Aug 2026, 16:38
12,594
+664
7 Aug 2026, 20:00
11,930
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:48
11,930
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
47.3%
avg views ÷ 15,272 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,230
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.721%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
11 (2 July 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
57,820
Reactions total
417
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
602 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
186
30.9%
❤
169
28.1%
🔥
75
12.5%
👏
64
10.6%
🎉
51
8.47%
💔
22
3.65%
🍾
10
1.66%
❤🔥
9
1.50%
🕊
8
1.33%
🤝
7
1.16%
💯
1
0.166%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 602reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 10 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Imperial_Citadel_Channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Dear Emperors!👑
We are constantly working on Imperial Citadel and improving the game to make it more interesting, engaging, and enjoyable for everyone.
At the moment, we are putting a strong focus on visual improvements, as well as enhancing and polishing the existing game mechanics and the overall appearance of your Imperial Citadel.
Today, we are already adding several visual updates that will make the game look …
🏆 Dear Emperors!
Our voting for the Best Imperial Citadel Video Review has officially come to an end!🎥
The winners are:
🥇@bestKoins_originale
🥈@TMcrypto2022
🥉@nooarAbyss
Congratulations to our winners!🎉
Very soon, these Ambassadors will receive promo codes for their audiences.
Each Ambassador will personally decide whether their promo code will be available only for their referrals or for everyone.
A huge thank …
🏆 Imperial Citadel Update — Top 50 is now open!
The Top 50 leaderboard is now available in the game and is divided into three separate rankings.
🥇 Top 25 by Gold
The more Gold you keep on your balance, the higher your position on the leaderboard.
⚔️ Top 15 by Raids
The more resources you earn from raids during the month, the higher you will climb in this ranking.
🛡 Top 10 by Duels
The more Duel victories you achi…
🏰 Imperial Citadel Update — Hero Duels Are Live!
Now you can challenge other players and prove whose Hero is truly the strongest.
⚔️ Key Features
• Battle for Diamonds or Gold.
• Duels are available separately for each Hero. Skeleton fights only Skeletons, Goblins fight only Goblins, and so on.
• Every Hero’s level determines their combat power. The higher your Hero’s level, the more damage they deal with every att…
⚔️ Important Changes to the Hero Raid Economy
We've made several important balance changes to Heroes during Raids.
• The resource theft percentage for every Hero at every level has been increased by 20%. Heroes can now steal even more Meat, Wood, and Gold during successful Raids.
• We've also reduced the recovery time after a Raid by 2 hours for every Hero. Your Heroes will now be ready much sooner for their next …
⚔️ Imperial Citadel Update!
🚨 Raids Are Now Live!
You can now raid other Emperors’ buildings and steal their resources.
Available raid targets:
🪵 Sawmills
🥩 Farms
⛏️ Gold Mines (if unlocked by the target player)
🦸♂️ Heroes
Every Hero has unique attributes, including:
• the amount of resources they can steal;
• raid duration;
• recovery time after a raid;
• and other unique stats.
⚖️ Raid Balance
To keep raids f…
🏰 Imperial Citadel Official Launch
Dear Emperors!
We are excited to officially announce the launch of Imperial Citadel!
Starting today, our empire is officially open, and we’ll continue expanding it with new mechanics and features step by step.
Right now you can already:
• Build and upgrade your city
• Produce Wood and Meat
• Upgrade your Gold Mines and mine Gold
• Unlock Heroes and use them to increase your Gold …
🏰 Dear Emperors!
Public Beta Testing is still in full swing, and every day more and more players are joining Imperial Citadel.
❤️ First of all, thank you for your incredible support! We honestly didn’t expect such amazing activity during the beta phase, and we’re truly grateful to every one of you.
🚀 The official launch is only a few days away. Once it begins, we’ll be able to focus even more on developing the pro…
🏰 Public Beta Testing of Imperial Citadel Has Begun!
The gates are now open!
You are among the very first players to enter Imperial Citadel and begin building your own empire.
Start by rebuilding your Capital, upgrading your Gold Mines, and becoming one of the first rulers to farm Gold and strengthen your kingdom.
💰 Remember: Gold = USDT. Every coin you mine could become more valuable than you think.
As an early…
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Imperial_Citadel_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 241,120 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Imperial_Citadel_Channel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@nooarabyss named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Imperial Citadel” (@Imperial_Citadel_Channel), 15,272 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Imperial_Citadel_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
