وقتی هوش مصنوعی وارد اتاق درمان می شود... ایماگوایران Join → @ImagoIran

Channel
رابطه امن (ایماگوتراپی)
@ImagoIran
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,494subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001140255978 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ImagoIran |
| Created | Between 1 May 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ImagoIran |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 1,494 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 1,495 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 1,496 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 1,496 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.6%
- avg views ÷ 1,494 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 323
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.76%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 January 2026 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 970 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 25s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
231 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 129 | 55.8% | |
| 👍 | 67 | 29.0% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 10.4% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 2.60% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 2.16% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
رابطهای ماندگار، اتفاقی نیست؛ ساخته میشود. بسیاری از ما تصور میکنیم اگر «فرد مناسب» را پیدا کنیم، رابطه خودبهخود خوب پیش خواهد رفت. اما ایماگو نگاه دیگری دارد. رابطهای سالم حاصلِ مهارتهایی است که یاد میگیریم؛ مهارتِ شنیدن، همدلی، گفتوگوی آگاهانه، احترام به تفاوتها و انتخابِ آگاهانه برای رشد در کنار یکدیگر. عشق، بیش از آنکه یک احساس باشد، یک تمرین روزانه است. ایماگوایران Join → @ImagoIran
❤11
به زودی منتشر می شود...
❤9👏6🔥2
چیزهایی که در یک رابطه زوجی, طبیعی و نرمال است. ایماگوایران Join → @ImagoIran
👏9👍4
آنچه کیفیت یک رابطه را تعیین میکند، یکسان فکر کردن نیست؛ بلکه توانایی احترام گذاشتن به تفاوتهاست. در ایماگوتراپی یاد میگیریم که اختلاف نظر، تهدیدی برای رابطه نیست؛ بلکه فرصتی برای شناخت عمیقتر خود و دیگری است. بسیاری از تعارضها زمانی شدت میگیرند که تفاوتها را اشتباه، بیاحترامی یا بیعلاقگی تعبیر میکنیم. رشد واقعی از جایی آغاز میشود که به جای تلاش برای تغییر طرف مقابل، کنجکاو شویم دنیای او را بفهمیم. گفتو…
❤13👏1
گاهی فکر میکنیم یک رابطه خوب فقط جایی است که در آن احساس عشق و آرامش کنیم. اما از نگاه هارویل هندریکس، یک رابطه آگاهانه چیزی فراتر از این است؛ رابطهای که به رشد روانی و معنوی هر دو نفر کمک میکند. «یک رابطه آگاهانه، رابطهای است که بیشترین رشد روانشناختی و معنوی را پرورش میدهد؛ رابطهای که با آگاه شدن و همکاری با نیازهای بنیادین ذهن ناخودآگاه شکل میگیرد: احساس امنیت داشتن، التیام یافتن، و به تمامیت رسیدن.»…
❤6
تنهایی، صرفاً نبودنِ یک شریک عاطفی نیست؛ بلکه میتواند فرصتی ارزشمند برای رشد و بلوغ باشد. هارویل هندریکس معتقد است که دوران مجردی، مرحلهای مهم از مسیر پختگی انسان است؛ زمانی برای اینکه خودِ واقعیمان را بهتر بشناسیم، مسئولیت زندگیمان را بپذیریم، روی پای خود بایستیم، خواستههای اصیلمان را کشف کنیم و با نقاط قوت و سایههای درونمان روبهرو شویم. اگر بدون شناخت خود وارد یک رابطه شویم، ممکن است از شریک زندگیمان ان…
❤11
«عمق عشق ما را میتوان با میزان تلاشهایمان سنجید. ما عشق خود را زمانی نشان میدهیم که آن قدمِ اضافه را برمیداریم.» — هارویل هندریکس عشق فقط یک احساس نیست؛ یک انتخاب روزانه است. گاهی عشق در یک گفتوگوی دشوار اما صادقانه دیده میشود، گاهی در گوش دادن بدون قضاوت، و گاهی در انجام کاری کوچک که میتوانستیم از آن بگذریم. کیفیت رابطهها بیشتر از آنکه به شدت احساسات وابسته باشد، به میزان تلاشی بستگی دارد که برای حفظ ارتب…
👍12
«ازدواج یک وضعیت ثابت میان دو انسانِ تغییرناپذیر نیست. ازدواج سفری روانشناختی و معنوی است که با شورِ جذب شدن آغاز میشود، از مسیر پرفرازونشیبِ خودشناسی عبور میکند و در نهایت به خلق یک پیوند صمیمی، شاد و مادامالعمر میانجامد.» #هارویل_هندریکس بسیاری از ما تصور میکنیم اگر عشق واقعی باشد، رابطه باید همیشه آسان و بیدردسر بماند. اما هارویل هندریکس یادآوری میکند که چالشها و تعارضهای رابطه نشانهٔ شکست نیستند؛ بلکه…
❤6
در ادبیات، درست مانند عشق، از آنچه دیگران انتخاب میکنند شگفتزده میشویم. آندره مورو (به نقل از کتاب «بازگشت به عشق» اثر دکتر هارویل هندریکس) بسیاری از ما وقتی به انتخابهای عاطفی دیگران نگاه میکنیم، متعجب میشویم؛ گاهی با خود میگوییم: «آخه چطور این دو نفر کنار هم دوام میارن؟» یا «چرا کسی باید جذب چنین شخصیتی بشه؟» اما واقعیت این است که انتخابهای ما در عشق، هرگز تصادفی نیستند. دکتر هارویل هندریکس در تئوری ایم…
❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
تا به حال به این فکر کردهاید که ما دنیا، اطرافیان و بهخصوص شریک عاطفیمان را از پشت چه لنزی میبینیم؟ در رویکرد ایماگو تراپی (رابطه درمانی ایماگو)، اعتقاد بر این است که بسیاری از تعارضها، سوءتفاهمها و دلخوریهای ما در رابطه، ناشی از واقعیتِ بیرونی نیست؛ بلکه به «لنزی» برمیگردد که به چشم زدهایم. این لنزها اغلب در دوران کودکی و بر اساس تجربهها، زخمها و نیازهای برآوردهنشدهی ما شکل گرفتهاند. وقتی با لنزِ «دف…
👍5❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ImagoIran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 448,426 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@drmostafanaeimi · 140,323
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رابطه امن (ایماگوتراپی)” (@ImagoIran), 1,494 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ImagoIran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.