Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for глазами мусульманина

Channel

глазами мусульманина

@ImaanRF

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,911subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001703558677
TypeChannel
Username@ImaanRF
Description« и напоминай, ибо напоминание приносит пользу верующим » [ 51:55 ] для связи с админами писать в личные сообщения канала.
Created24 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ImaanRF

Growth

9,9119,9689,939.56 August 2026 — 9,963 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,963 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,962 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,968 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,953 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,960 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,957 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,931 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,911 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,902–9,977 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 13:549,911-20
25 Aug 2026, 20:029,931-26
23 Aug 2026, 02:579,957-3
19 Aug 2026, 15:469,960+7
16 Aug 2026, 07:189,953-15
10 Aug 2026, 01:069,968+6
6 Aug 2026, 16:409,962-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:169,963no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:019,963first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.7%
avg views ÷ 9,911 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,350
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held40 (16 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total58,690
Reactions total2,950
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
105
Videos
125
Links
54

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 25s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,766 reactions across 40 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,766100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,766reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 40 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ImaanRF. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC316 views31 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Ассаляму алейкум, братья и сёстры. В последнее время в социальных сетях всё чаще можно встретить попытки выставить Ислам в плохом свете: высмеять религию, оскорбить её или представить всё так, будто именно Ислам лишает женщин каких-либо прав и возможностей. Поэтому хотим напомнить вам, что на нашем канале уже были собраны материалы, которые могут помочь разобраться в подобных вопросах. Мы создавали отдельные телегр

31

26 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,120 views108 reactionsread 29 August 2026

когда чувствуешь, что отдаляешься от Корана, подумай, за какие грехи Аллах лишил тебя этой милости?

108

25 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,310 views112 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

однажды мы поймем, что один из самых счастливых моментов в нашей жизни - это время, которое мы проводим с размышлением над Кораном, вдумываясь и исцеляясь от болезней наших сердец.

112

24 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC≈1,500 views113 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

когда я не могу дотянуться до тех , кто в моем сердце , я всегда приближаюсь к ним через свои молитвы.

113

23 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,680 views124 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

и возможно даже не подумаешь, что вот, сейчас настанет час, омоют твое тело, обвернут в саван, что сейчас тебя уложат в тесную, сырую могилу. и тяжело осознавать, что ты можешь уйти к своему Господу в положении, котором бы ты не хотел встретить своего Господа. смерть это истина и она явится, как бы ты этого не хотел. вернись к своему Господу, пока не стало поздно.

124

22 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC≈1,730 views96 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

нет возвращения после смерти: ты больше не сможешь заучить какую-нибудь суру; не сможешь изучить то, что оберегло бы тебя от грехов, которые ты совершил; не покаялся за свои грехи; не стал лучше к родителям и родственникам; не подавал часто милостыню. ты вспомнишь каждое маленькое благое деяние, которое пропустил в этой жизни: маленькое поминание, которое у Аллаха было большим; доброе слово верующему; улыбка, когда

96

21 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC≈1,880 views152 reactions8 Starsread 29 August 2026

сначала ты расстраиваешься, а потом благодаришь Всевышнего за то, как всё сложилось.

152

18 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC≈2,590 views161 reactionsread 29 August 2026

пусть Аллах охладит прохладой в райских садах всех сестёр, которые носят покрывало в эту жару ради Аллаха.

161

17 Aug 2026, 00:50 UTC≈2,780 views128 reactionsread 29 August 2026

она наконец покрылась, но только на глубине двух метров под землей..

128

16 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈2,870 views140 reactionsread 29 August 2026

и ты думаешь, что был лишен, но на самом деле, ты был помилован.

140

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @ImaanRF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 609,068 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“глазами мусульманина” (@ImaanRF), 9,911 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ImaanRF.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.