صلاة يرحمكم الله

Channel
سلام العراقي
@Im_salam_iq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,203subscribers
-325 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002061104891 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Im_salam_iq |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Im_salam_iq |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 21,203 | -31 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 21,234 | -24 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 21,258 | -48 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:05 | 21,306 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:26 | 21,316 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 21,332 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 21,347 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 21,361 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 21,362 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 21,375 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 21,378 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 21,387 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 21,398 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 21,409 | -36 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 21,445 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 21,449 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 21,452 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:09 | 21,465 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 21,476 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 21,479 | first reading |
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.7%
- avg views ÷ 21,203 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,320
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (26 June 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 56,430 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 16:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 08s
- Average length
- 38s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
ميفيد الدعاء من وراكم يكطعون الانترنت على الوادم
- الرسالة : عموو سلومي ادعيلنا غدا امتحاني وخايفه ممكن اتكون اقرب مني الى الله الله يخليك ويسعدك
دائما خلي الوضوء قبل وقت خليك منتظر للصلاة 🌹
موفقين ان شاء الله
- الرسالة : عمـوو جيتك خير علي، نـور الدنيـا "علي"🥹💙
برغر بالجبن ،، لان اليقين بالله مو سهل الإنسان يحصله
- الرسالة : الشخص اليأس من الحياه شتقدموله؟
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته ماناسيكم بس العقيق مغلسة عنكم
- الرسالة : سلام عليكم عمو منين طالعه شمس همزين اتذكرتنا وتذكرت عندك بنات تسأل عليهم حتى عقيق صاير ماكو هم تختفي شلونك اخبارك عقيق شلونها🌸🩷
مرات تصير امور اكبر مني لازم اتفرغ الها
- الرسالة : مُلا ليش گاطع بينا؟ متغير على بناتك😔💔.
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @Im_salam_iq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@s2ar_a · 63,315
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 August 2026
@aylol_w · 172,919
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
@ev13a · 87,146
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 17 August 2026
@zhraalsalmi · 120,502
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 August 2026
@itsarakh · 65,986
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 August 2026
@iorangee · 37,045
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 1 September 2026
@The1Holy1Quran1 · 80,518
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 August 2026
@asawer_hussein22 · 130,354
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
@alruer · 67,460
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سلام العراقي” (@Im_salam_iq), 21,203 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Im_salam_iq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.