Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Отзывы

@ImRealYuqiS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002950816253
TypeChannel
Username@ImRealYuqiS
Description@Priceliasw
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ImRealYuqiS

Growth

212 Aug 2026, 21:45 — 2 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 19:47 — 2 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:4513 Aug 2026, 19:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 19:472no change
12 Aug 2026, 21:452first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

2 May 2026, 20:47 UTC12 viewsread 13 August 2026

брала рекламу на 6 часов , пришли люди , пришел актив , прайс очень хороший, всем советую и буду брать ещё

20 Apr 2026, 15:53 UTC16 viewsread 13 August 2026

спасибо!!! брала 100пм, добили быстренько, цены дешевые, буду брать еще

16 Mar 2026, 18:42 UTC23 viewsread 13 August 2026

Брала рекламу на 9 часов,приход был +20 чел! Я в шоке,буду брать обязательно ещё❣ цена очень приятная,советую!

11 Mar 2026, 16:47 UTC26 viewsread 13 August 2026

привет, спасибо огромное, приход был, я 140+ добила от 129

20 Feb 2026, 14:43 UTC29 viewsread 13 August 2026

большое спасибо за рекламу, за такую цену услуга топ так ещё приход в человек 15

20 Feb 2026, 14:05 UTC29 viewsread 13 August 2026

Добили просмотры довольно быстро, у Лии всегда всё наипрекрасно Приход был, обязательно буду брать ещё 🩶🩶

8 Feb 2026, 16:25 UTC33 viewsread 13 August 2026

брала бокс на пм и рекламу, просмотры добили быстро, а с рекламы был приход ⭐мне добили 100+ пдп, буду брать еще все дешево и выгодно, всем советую🤍

3 Feb 2026, 17:09 UTC33 viewsread 13 August 2026

Реклама мне понравилась. Приход был хороший,5-6 человек точно. Но больше мне понравилось что поднялись просмотры

1 Feb 2026, 19:37 UTC31 viewsread 13 August 2026

Брала 100 пм у Лии, добила быстренько, приход был и довольно хороший, беру не в первый раз, всем советую 🩶

1 Feb 2026, 19:25 UTC30 viewsread 13 August 2026

Приветик, спасибо большое за рекламу Отзыв: Брала рекламу за 9 часов, пришло около 7 человек, я довольна, просмотры тоже повысились

29 Jan 2026, 16:26 UTC26 viewsread 13 August 2026

покупала рекламу на 6 часов все прошло хорошо приход был хороший советую

25 Jan 2026, 09:11 UTC27 viewsread 13 August 2026

Приход был, пришло 6 человек за 9 часов, спасибо буду брать ещё.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ImRealYuqiS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,111,498 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отзывы” (@ImRealYuqiS), 2 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ImRealYuqiS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.