Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IllidanSTR stream channel

Channel

IllidanSTR stream channel

@IllidanSTR123

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,349subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001188424575
TypeChannel
Username@IllidanSTR123
Created9 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/IllidanSTR123

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,19112,35112,2716 August 2026 — 12,351 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,350 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,342 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,339 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,335 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,328 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,324 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,323 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,331 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,327 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,320 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,311 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,309 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,304 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,286 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,266 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,252 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,253 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,248 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,241 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,240 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,239 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,237 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,231 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,226 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,216 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,209 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,205 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,199 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,193 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,191 subscribers24 September 2026 — 12,349 subscribers12,3496 August 202624 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 50 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,167–12,375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 21:4112,349+158
18 Sept 2026, 20:3612,191-2
16 Sept 2026, 12:1512,193-6
14 Sept 2026, 16:1512,199-6
13 Sept 2026, 03:3612,205-4
11 Sept 2026, 01:5912,209-7
8 Sept 2026, 05:0112,216-10
5 Sept 2026, 04:1712,226-5
3 Sept 2026, 09:3612,231-6
2 Sept 2026, 06:3712,237-2
1 Sept 2026, 08:4312,239-1
31 Aug 2026, 05:2612,240-1
29 Aug 2026, 06:2612,241-7
27 Aug 2026, 06:4812,248-5
26 Aug 2026, 07:4312,253+1
24 Aug 2026, 06:4612,252-14
22 Aug 2026, 11:1712,266-20
20 Aug 2026, 23:3812,286-18
20 Aug 2026, 02:3212,304-5
19 Aug 2026, 06:0512,309first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 12 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 31 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,161 reactions across 31 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,13898.0%
👎231.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,161 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC≈2,800 views98 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @followjotm

Закончился 15-й инт, и захотелось поделиться чувствами в Телеграме. Последний раз такое было в 2021-м году, когда Спириты поднимали свою первую тарелку. Там тоже был очень зрелищный гранд-финал, тоже 3-2, хоть в этот раз сам турнир имел призовой в 12 раз меньше. Эмоции от финала у многих схожие: 10 высококлассных игроков, 2 умнейших тренера - настоящий апогей скилла за всю историю игры, хайлайты, "бо5 - это маленька…

👍91👎7

23 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈4,010 views167 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Величайшая команда в истории доты в лучшем в истории финале.

👍165👎2

22 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC≈4,140 views66 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Такие спириты мне нравятся. посмотрим завтра что будет.

👍65👎1

22 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC≈4,450 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026

тараска наги = конец игры, а жаль, могли прям в этой карте 1 свич линий сделать и, на мой взгляд, было бы в разы лучше.

👍32

22 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC≈4,450 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026

а почему лешрак-то в мид не пошел? ну делаааа

👍24

22 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC≈4,460 views29 reactionsread 2 September 2026

а вот здесь я нигме отдам предпочтение по драфту, оч круто ластпикнули

👍28👎1

22 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC≈4,390 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026

огромная ставка была на этого 18 хускара и пик сфа похоронил шансы нигмы по драфту абсолютно. ВП булк

👍24👎1

21 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC≈4,570 views42 reactionsread 2 September 2026

из нововведений , кстати, которое реально довели до ума и оно теперь прекрасно работает - это баннер. Наверное, это лучшая доработка дота-механики за последние лет 6 из всех. Гейты топ2

👍40👎2

21 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC≈4,570 views47 reactionsread 2 September 2026

вот пожалуйста, побегали 50 минут, тайд подходит к вайперу (без байбека) не жмет еул на вайперстрайк, в панике вся команда пытается спасти его, потому что не понимает что чел вообще делает, проигрыш за 10 секунд по одному. Не, базара нет, инт реально эпичный, но вот конец этой карты зайдет как один из самых абсурдных концов серии за всю историю интернешнала мне кажется)

👍46👎1

21 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC≈4,620 views54 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Последние патчи в доте были довольно хороши, но у меня лично вызывает беспокойство то, что вальв срезали награды с обжективов, таких как эксп руна и торментор. Отдача всех обжективов до второго рошана без надобности форсить файты - это просто раковая опухоль на теле современной доты. Про команды в подавляющем своем большинстве просто бегают друг от друга по гигантской карте, а потери в виде рошанов/торменторов/эксп р…

👍53👎1

20 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC≈3,970 views42 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Делей на плейоффе инта - это какой-то ужас, если честно.

👍40👎2

31 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC≈6,560 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://www.twitch.tv/vendettka тут в сплит фикшн играю

👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @IllidanSTR123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Iceberggg
@icebergtut · 20,891
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
Сельский Стас
@malr1neDotes · 26,968
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IllidanSTR stream channel” (@IllidanSTR123), 12,349 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IllidanSTR123.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.