Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

info

@Iii1nf0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004486957687
TypeChannel
Username@Iii1nf0
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 12 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Iii1nf0

Growth

18 August 2026 — 1 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1 subscribers8 August 202614 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:321no change
8 Aug 2026, 22:471first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1042.9%
avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
Avg views / post
10.4
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
14
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held18 (12 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total146
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC9 viewsread 14 August 2026

это мое субъективное мнение,так что не стоит судить меня за то,что я не оценила ваш канал так,как бы вам хотелось. всем спасибо за участие 🤍

2 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC9 viewsread 14 August 2026

@ByHyunjin – архив по хенджину скрины хорошие, качественные,но стоит ещё поработать над моментами. стикеров в наборах много,они юзабельные и не лагают. подача удобная. оформление базовое и аккуратное,сс на файлы прикреплена тоже удобно. итог: 9,5/10

2 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC9 viewsread 14 August 2026

@Pr1ncessWonyoung – архив по вонен оформа мне немного не зашла. я бы убрала пробелы между текстом,но в целом, выглядит аккуратно. колор хорошенький. подача удобная,но не понравилась в 3 и 4 фотки. подборки в принципе подходящие. и еще,думаю,стоит почистить канал от ненужных репостов итог: 7/10

2 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC17 viewsread 14 August 2026

@sakaimoka44 – архив по моке есть немного неудачных скринов по моментам,стоит ещё поработать. кч плохое,но не везде. советую не улучшать в каких-то приложениях или ботах скрины,иначе будет либо мыло,либо ии эффект. лучше добавить немного резкости, где-то +1 или +3,но не перебарщивать и на само видео ставить как можно высокое качество. так же,советую сделать один формат скринов. именно,в канал можно выкладывать фотки

2 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC9 viewsread 14 August 2026

@archivkarina – архив по карине аккуратная база, нравится оформа с жирным шрифтом. подача удобная. скрины качественные и удачные. стикеры юз,они не лагают,а ещё их много в наборе. сс на файлы прикреплена удобно итог: 10/10

2 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC14 viewsread 14 August 2026

@CoquetteHabbit – архив по вонхи оформа очень красивая,не смотря на то,что без тгп. понравились подборки,они нереально подходят + смотрится гармонично. колор нежнятина,чб приятный глазу. коллажи чудесные. в общем и целом, один восторг от архива,я подписалась! итог: 10/10

2 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC9 viewsread 14 August 2026

@ladywonyy – архив по вонен подача удобная, оформление хоть и базовое,но аккуратное. скрины качественные и достаточно удачные. стикеров много,они юзабельные,не лагают. чб на некоторых фотках приятный и не ядерный. нереально приятно листать кн итог: 10/10

2 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC10 viewsread 14 August 2026

@onlysongmingi – архив по минги подача удобная, очень нравится что на некоторых постах текст сверху. скрины хорошики,они удачные + качественные. стикеров в целом как-будто маловато,но именно в наборах их достаточно, юзабельные и не лагают. аккуратная база, приятно листать кн итог: 10/10

2 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC12 viewsread 14 August 2026

@Blazrl – архив по рюлю(?) простенькое оформление,но аккуратное. сс на файлы прикреплена удобно + хорошо что в тех же файлах понятно написана дата обновы. колор приятный, хорошо ложится на фотки. скрины удачные и качественные, как-будто даже колор не съедает кч. стикеров много,они юзабельные и не лагают. сам канал приятный и в нем какой-то вайб отдельный итог: 10/10

2 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC11 viewsread 14 August 2026

@onlytwinning – архив по виннин подача хорошенькая и удобная. скрины качественные,но есть парочку неудачных моментов. стикеров в наборе хорошее количество, юзабельные и не лагают. оформление база,нет ничего лишнего и выглядит приятно итог: 9,8/10

2 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC9 viewsread 14 August 2026

@onlyhuh – архив по юнджин ваау нереально крутой кн,я долго листала и залипла... подача удобная, очень понравилась в виде кружка. скрины хорошенькие,они удачные и качественные. ещё,мне показалось прикольным то,что другим участницам вы можете закрыть их лица разными смайликами. стикеров много,как и в наборах,так и в целом. юзабельные и тоже качественные. приятно листать кн,я подписалась итог: 10/10

2 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC4 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @IItsYunah

оценка архивов от рии репост этой записи и этого поста,подписка ТОЛЬКО если понравился кн и будете следить,архив в комм (1чел-1кн) 10/10

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Iii1nf0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“info” (@Iii1nf0), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Iii1nf0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.