![Telegram profile photo for Picturesque [no longer active]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/75/75f352d60684760eb272540dd8dcc2c73405b904dde9131ab4dfe76c4a4fa4f9.jpg)
Channel
@Idyllict
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001543861797 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Idyllict |
| Created | 21 July 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Idyllict |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 3 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 3 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 21 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 November 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Picturesque [no longer active] pinned «[] Hey moots, it's me again, Sebire's mundane speaking. So a few days ago i told you guys that i'm going to take a little break. But now, i decided to leave this world. I have my own reasons that i can't tell you. But the point is i've been really busy lately…»
[] Hey moots, it's me again, Sebire's mundane speaking. So a few days ago i told you guys that i'm going to take a little break. But now, i decided to leave this world. I have my own reasons that i can't tell you. But the point is i've been really busy lately so yeah. Thank you for being my moots, also thanks to some of you for being my friends. Sorry for this sudden announcement. And sorry i can't chat (my friends) …
Sticker, posted without a caption
[] Hello moots, this is Sébire's mundane speaking. Due to my personal reasons, I decided to put my account and this channel into a rest mode. Please do not unsubscribe this channel. Or if you want to unsubscribe please remove @ningqzhuo from your channel. You can contact this bot @ningyizhuoo_bot if there is something important. Thank you for reading this message, see you in a few days 🤎.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
📁📁📁
Signed Sébire
message not found
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ I’m blasting up into outer-space, as fast as Ussian Bolt in race. Twirling, swirling up and down, whizzing past the bright and beautiful stars. Drifting along the Milky Way, there’s nothing in my way. Planets the same colour as the crowns crown, it turns my frown upside down. I’m feeling scared, excited at the same time, not knowing what’s going to happen next. I might meet some crazy creatures along the way, i’ll …
Photo, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Idyllict. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What do you think about Sébire??
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2021 to 13 November 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 891,601 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Idyllict named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Picturesque [no longer active]” (@Idyllict), 3 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Idyllict.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.