Channel
@Idopresales_com
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,570subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001272181449 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Idopresales_com |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Idopresales_com |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 2,570 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 2,579 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 2,586 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 2,587 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 21 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
21 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2025 to 10 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We made 3 trades in the last two weeks. We won on two and lost on one. All were BTC trades. In total, we made 4 R . I'm happy that we made a good profit even during a time when the whole market crashed. We continue to grow our budget. Not too many trades, no big risks, and no sharing that will create FOMO (fear of missing out). If you want to continue making profits with fewer trades, join us.
Signed Ido_Presales_com
BTC BTCtrades no:4, short Entry: 84356; Stop: 86050 TP1: 82655
👍1
Signed Ido_Presales_com
BTC is dumping. I hope you don't lose much. At our trade group, we shorted yesterday at 84356 We did 4 BTC trades, and our win rate is 100% If you want to join trade group, please check pinned message
Signed Ido_Presales_com
Over the past two weeks, we've made six trades. We won three, lost two, and one is still in profit. In total, we earned 0.25 R. Our ongoing trade is a BTC long position we bought last night at 86200, and it's in profit. In total, we're making profits and continuing to grow our budget. There aren't many trades, no big risks, and no posts that will create FOMO. If you want to continue making profits with fewer trades,…
Signed Ido_Presales_com
Last week, we did one trade and won. The first rule is: don't lose money. With few trades and low risk, we continue to grow our budget. Our goal is to increase our earnings regularly.
👍1
Signed Ido_Presales_com
Last week we executed two trades. One was on an altcoin (PEPE) pair, and the other was in Degen mode (AT). Both trades were successful. The first rule is: don't lose money. With few trades and low risk, we continue to grow our budget. Our goal is to increase our earnings regularly.
🔥1
Signed Ido_Presales_com
IdoPresales_com pinned «Hello everyone, I haven’t been sharing presales for a long time. The reason is simple: there is currently no environment where we can realistically make money. Most presales today are structured in a way that benefits only the project team and insiders. I…»
Hello everyone, I haven’t been sharing presales for a long time. The reason is simple: there is currently no environment where we can realistically make money. Most presales today are structured in a way that benefits only the project team and insiders. I will wait until the overall altcoin market improves. In the meantime, I will continue to share only projects that I know are not scams. Over the past two years in…
🔥2
Signed Ido_Presales_com
🎯Target achieved for SOL long
Signed Ido_Presales_com
As I mentioned in previous analysis, SOL encountered resistance at $158-160. SOL broke the downtrend. A SOL long can be built from here. Don't forget to put SL.
👍1
Signed Ido_Presales_com
As I mentioned in my previous analysis, #SOL bounced at $126. Some profit can be realized from here. After breaking the downtrend, the rise continues. The first resistance is between $158-160
👍2❤1
Signed Ido_Presales_com
Ripple $XRP Analysis The $1.95 level is significant for #XRP. In closings below this level, the price will retreat to the $1.6-$1.5 level. After the loss of the $1.95 level, a short position can be built in the retest. For the positive scenario, there should be no closing below the $1.95 level. It should also break the downward trend on the daily.
👍1
Signed Ido_Presales_com
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Idopresales_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 850,505 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IdoPresales_com” (@Idopresales_com), 2,570 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Idopresales_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.