Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🔞 иди нахуй confession !

@IdInahyicF

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,128subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002047595653
TypeChannel
Username@IdInahyicF
Created27 March 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/IdInahyicF

Growth

2,1262,1412,133.56 August 2026 — 2,126 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,130 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,141 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,128 subscribers2,1286 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,124–2,143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:172,128-13
10 Aug 2026, 05:102,141+11
7 Aug 2026, 00:262,130+4
6 Aug 2026, 12:062,126first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.54%
avg views ÷ 2,128 subscribers
Avg views / post
75.3
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held40 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,010
Reactions total150
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

150 reactions across 23 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3825.3%
🙏2617.3%
🤝1912.7%
😱138.67%
👎128.00%
❤‍🔥74.67%
💘42.67%
🖕42.67%
😢42.67%
🤡42.67%
🕊32.00%
🗿32.00%
🤓32.00%
👍21.33%
🤯21.33%
🎄10.667%
💔10.667%
😨10.667%
🤣10.667%
🤮10.667%
1 further kind10.667%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC19 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

идите нахуй алкоголики @inkftakes_bot | @IdInahyicF

🤓3🕊2🙏21❤‍🔥1👍1

Signed инкф тейки

7 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC33 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

иди нахуй владелец полурп полуфлуда по китайфд современный пекин в 2025 мразь я помню как ты педофилию оправдывал сука еще и меня с чу ваньинем забанил когда тебе глаза открыли а кто блять рп с колен поднимал ?? кто активил когда был мёртвый чат ?? кто сделал переоформление , кто продвигал рп ?? живи со своим педофилом ебаным шлюха подзаборная надеюсь он нашёл тебя и зарезал где-нибудь это ведь так романтично как гов

😱41🤝1🤡1

Signed инкф тейки

7 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC31 viewsread 7 August 2026

Спам боты в девиантарт идите нахуй со своим скамом ЕсЛИ ТЫ НЕ ВЕРИФИЦИРУНШЬ АКК МЫ ТЕБЯ УДАЛИМ 😨😨😨😨 @inkftakes_bot | @IdInahyicF

Signed инкф тейки

7 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC61 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Владельцы-обиженки идите нахуй Была во флуде по кисм и тпох, это такая пизда. Владелец не выкупил юмора и начал срач, причем САМ, даже не пытаясь разрулить ситуацию, а после начал оправдываться что это типо мы тупые и шутим не смешно. В итоге удалил всех 🥺 @inkftakes_bot | @IdInahyicF

5🤝2👍1

Signed инкф тейки

7 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC75 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

идите нахуй сыновья и дочери тайских шлюх которые постоянно шутят про войну и прочую хуйню,умерло много людей а вы как свиньи на диване это говорите,если хотите всякую херь похрюкать куда-то то хрюкайте своей мамаше на ухо,заебали уже у меня в комментариях под видео писать,видео даже не на эту тему,а они умудряются эту хуйню писать,я вам в еблет насру ебалаи С любовью:Долли💞 @inkftakes_bot | @IdInahyicF

❤‍🔥4💘1

Signed инкф тейки

7 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC83 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Идите нахуй все Почему все настолько отдалены от проявления чувств? Почему людям не нравится когда им выражают свою любовь? Я уже ебанулся и начал с цветами говорит гладить их и обнимать @inkftakes_bot | @IdInahyicF

🙏4

Signed инкф тейки

7 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC95 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Идите нахуй люди которые на любой долбаный вопрос отвечает только хз, какой должен быть словарный запас у таких что бы на все отвечать двумя буквами, да и + на другие вопросы отвечать типо только нет и да @inkftakes_bot | @IdInahyicF

3

Signed инкф тейки

7 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC118 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

идите нахуй сны про психушку, это конечно было давно, но сука я в жизни не хочу обратно туда, каждый сон про нее просто отвратительный и реальность моя там тоже была отвратительная, желаю блять всем кто хуёво ко мне там обращался гореть в аду и снам таким идти нахуй @inkftakes_bot | @IdInahyicF

🤯2

Signed инкф тейки

7 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC130 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бля, иди нахуй @inkftakes_bot | @IdInahyicF

👎12🖕4💘21🕊1🤝1🤡1

Signed инкф тейки

7 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC139 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Иди нахуй брат,ты заебал пиздить мою зарядку для телефона без спроса,это твои проблемы что ты свою в тц потерял.Я скоро драться буду за свою зарядку,это пиздец какой-то уже, это ни в какие ворота не лезет.💔💔💔 [Тацу] @inkftakes_bot | @IdInahyicF

🤝5

Signed инкф тейки

7 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC128 viewsread 7 August 2026

гость, иди нахуй. кратко объясняю ситуацию. гость, мой интернет друн (бывший друн), он был в меня влюблён, а мне было на него похуй и плюсом я уже была занята лол. потом, он ахуеть испортился и я перестала с ним дружить, спустя пару месяцев я все таки соскучилась по моментам с ним и решила дать ему второй шанс, о чем я жалею. он оказался ещё хуже и в итоге я его еще раз бросила. в итоге, сегодня я написала ему насчёт

Signed инкф тейки

7 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC105 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ГНИЕНИЕ В УХЕ, ТУБЕРКУЛЁЗНЫЕ ТРУБКИ НЕИЗВЕСТНО ОТКУДА И ПРОЧЕЕ, ИДИТЕ НАХУЙ. ДИАГНОСТИРУЙТЕ МНЕ СМЕРТЬ УЖЕ, ЧЕ СЛОЖНОГО? И ИНЕТ ТОЖЕ ИДЕТ НАХУЙ. СТОИЛО МНЕ ДОМОЙ ВЕРНУТЬСЯ И ВСЕ ПО ПИЗДЕ ПОШЛО. Неанон шкатулка @inkftakes_bot | @IdInahyicF

😢4

Signed инкф тейки

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @IdInahyicF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 552,448 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔞 иди нахуй confession !” (@IdInahyicF), 2,128 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IdInahyicF.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.