𝐈𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐈𝐂 𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐂 pinned a video

Channel
𝐈𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐈𝐂 𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐂
@Iconicmusic1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
13,900subscribers
-98 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001792458078 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Iconicmusic1 |
| Description | موزیک ویدیوهای آیکانیک و نوستالژی با زیرنویس فارسی 𝐈𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜 & 𝐍𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐠𝐢𝐚 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜 𝐕𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐒𝐮𝐛𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐞 راه ارتباط فقط از طريق گروه ( لینک گروه در کانال هست ) لینک اولین پست کانال https://t.me/Iconicmusic1/9 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Iconicmusic1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 13,900 | -22 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 13,922 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 13,931 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 13,945 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 13,950 | -17 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 13,967 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:41 | 13,979 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 13,980 | -14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 13,994 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 13,998 | first reading |
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.52%
- avg views ÷ 13,900 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 628
- 32 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.09%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 33
- of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (22 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,100 |
| Reactions total | 420 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 00:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 49
- Videos
- 587
- Links
- 269
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 20m 58s
- Average length
- 3m 00s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
402 reactions across 31 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 129 | 32.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 97 | 24.1% | |
| 👍 | 41 | 10.2% | |
| 💔 | 39 | 9.70% | |
| ⚡ | 32 | 7.96% | |
| 🏆 | 11 | 2.74% | |
| 💘 | 11 | 2.74% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 1.99% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 1.99% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 1.74% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.24% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 1.24% | |
| 😘 | 5 | 1.24% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.746% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.249% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 420reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤🔥5
🎧1996 #546 𝐈𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜
👍5🔥3😍2❤🔥1💘1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥4🔥3💘1😍1
#Love_Fool #The_Cardigans 🎧1996 #Genre : #Indie_Pop #546 این آهنگ ابتدا برای آلبوم First Band on the Moon ساخته شد، اما پس از استفاده در فیلم Romeo + Juliet به شهرت جهانی رسید. موفقیت فیلم باعث شد #Lovefool به یکی از ماندگارترین آهنگهای دهه 90 و شناختهشدهترین اثر #د_کاردیگنز تبدیل شود. #احمق_عاشق #د_کاردیگنز #زیرنویس_چسبیده_فارسی 𝐈𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜
❤🔥4🔥4💘1😍1
سلام بچه ها لینک جدید گروه دوست داشتین جوین بشید 🤘🏻🤜🏻🤛🏻✔️
🙏5😘4
بچه ها اینم 🐯 Eye of the Tiger 🤌🏻✔️
🔥8🏆2👍2
حالا شما از کدوم اهنگ بیشتر خاطره دارین و دوسش دارین ؟
- 1.🐯 Eye of the Tiger — Dave Bickler — 198290%
- 2. ❤️🔥 Burning Heart — Jimi Jamison — 198513%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥5👍2🏆1
🎸 یه نکته جالب درباره گروه Survivor که شاید خیلیها ندونن: وقتی اسم Survivor میاد، بیشترمون یاد Eye of the Tiger (چشم ببر) میافتیم؛ همون آهنگ معروف Rocky III که در سال ۱۹۸۲ حسابی ترکوند. اما خواننده این آهنگ Dave Bickler بود، نه Jimi Jamison. دیو بیکلر از خوانندههای اصلی Survivor بود و بعد از موفقیت بزرگ «چشم ببر»، گروه وارد یک دوره خیلی فشرده از اجرا و ضبط شد. همین فشار کاری باعث شد بیکلر با مشکل جدی در تارهای ص…
🔥10👍3🫡1🙏1
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤🔥4🏆1🔥1
🎧 1985 #545 𝐈𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜
🔥7❤🔥5🏆1💯1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥2🔥2🏆1
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @Iconicmusic1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
حالا شما از کدوم اهنگ بیشتر خاطره دارین و دوسش دارین ؟
- 1.🐯 Eye of the Tiger — Dave Bickler — 198290%
- 2. ❤️🔥 Burning Heart — Jimi Jamison — 198513%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 335,029 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐈𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐈𝐂 𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐂” (@Iconicmusic1), 13,900 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Iconicmusic1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.