Channel
@IchsteheimNebenraum
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001709545852 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IchsteheimNebenraum |
| Description | Die Kunst des krieges |
| Created | 27 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IchsteheimNebenraum |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 16 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 16 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2023 to 11 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 1 month. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.
Snowden fügte einen UPI-Nachrichtenbericht vom April 1961 hinzu, in dem US-Außenminister Dean Rusk leugnete, dass die Schweinebucht "von amerikanischem Boden aus inszeniert" worden sei, wobei Rusk den Medien sagte: "Die kubanische Affäre war eine für die Kubaner selbst
Fallen Ihnen Beispiele aus der Geschichte einer geheimen Operation ein, für die das Weiße Haus verantwortlich war, aber stark dementiert wurde?" Snowden twitterte. "Außerdem wissen Sie, diese kleine 'Massenüberwachung'-Kerfuffle", fügte er hinzu
Fallen Ihnen Beispiele aus der Geschichte einer geheimen Operation ein, für die das Weiße Haus verantwortlich war, aber stark dementiert wurde?" Snowden twitterte. "Außerdem wissen Sie, diese kleine 'Massenüberwachung'-Kerfuffle", fügte er hinzu
👍1
Es ist erstaunlich für mich, wie sie sich einreihen, meine Kollegen", sagte Hersh und bezog sich dabei auf die New York Times und die Washington Post. Wie wir bereits hervorgehoben haben, tadelte Snowden die Leugnung des Weißen Hauses, dass es an dem Pipeline-Angriff beteiligt war, indem er darauf hinwies, dass es auch frühere falsche Flaggen leugnete
Die Verschwörer wussten, dass die verdeckte Operation ein "Kriegsakt" war, und einige in der CIA und im Außenministerium warnten: "Tu das nicht. Es ist dumm und wird ein politischer Albtraum, wenn es herauskommt." In einem Update der Geschichte gab Hersh ein Interview mit Radio War Nerd, in dem er die Mainstream-Medien dafür kritisierte, ihn persönlich zu kritisieren, anstatt die Geschichte zu untersuchen
Laut Hershs Quellen wurde der Sprengstoff im Juni 2022 von Tauchern der US Navy unter dem Deckmantel der NATO-Übung BALTOPS 22 platziert und drei Monate später mit einem Fernsignal einer Sonarboje gezündet
👍1
Snowden twitterte, dass die Hysterie ein "konstruierter" Köder und Schalter sei, um die Medien daran zu hindern, über die Enthüllungen über die Pipeline-Explosion zu berichten. Letzte Woche veröffentlichte der mit dem Pulitzer-Preis ausgezeichnete investigative Journalist Seymour Hersh einen Artikel, in dem er behauptete, dass die Pipelines von den USA im Rahmen einer verdeckten Operation zerstört wurden
In Wirklichkeit, wie die meisten Leute darauf hingewiesen haben, sind die Abschüsse wahrscheinlich eine Machtdemonstration, um die Errötungen der Biden-Regierung vor Fragen zu bewahren, warum der chinesische Spionageballon Amerika überhaupt überwachen durfte. Laut Edward Snowden ist die UFO-Klappe auch eine Irreführung, um die unendlich peinlichere Seymour Hersh-Geschichte aus den Schlagzeilen zu wischen
Gestern bestritt das Weiße Haus, dass die Objekte außerirdischer Natur waren, obwohl die oberflächliche Entlassung, wenn überhaupt, nur zu Spekulationen im Internet führte, dass ET eine Stippvisite abstattet hatte
In der vergangenen Woche gab es mindestens vier Fälle von US-Kampfflugzeugen, die nicht identifizierte Flugobjekte zerstörten, in einem Fall über Alaska, einem Objekt, das keine Antriebsmittel hatte, aber in 40.000 Fuß Höhe gesichtet wurde und Piloten sagten, störte die Sensoren ihres Flugzeugs
Das wird alles zurückkommen, wenn TRUMPS KONGRESS sich auf der Nord Stream Line US-Militärsabotage bewegt)//// NSA-Whistleblower Edward Snowden sagt, die Hysterie über UFOs, die über Amerika und Kanada abgeschossen werden, lenkt von Seymour Hershs Geschichte ab, dass die USA für die Sprengung der Nord Stream-Pipelines verantwortlich sind
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IchsteheimNebenraum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@IchsteheimNebenraum named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Weiße Hüte❤️” (@IchsteheimNebenraum), 16 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IchsteheimNebenraum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.