Channel
@Iboughtcrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9,241subscribers
-63 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001693405024 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Iboughtcrypto |
| Description | Маленький канал про крипто индустрию так чисто по факту 🫠Чат: @Iboughtcryptochat 🥸Автор: @TopTgDima |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Iboughtcrypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 9,241 | -44 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 9,285 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 9,304 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 9,304 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
103 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 49 | 47.6% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 18.4% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 6.80% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 6.80% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 5.83% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 3.88% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 3.88% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.971% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2025 to 2 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 Начался новый сезон Nat Coin! По заявлению проекта, стартовал четвёртый этап 🔥 Пока информации немного, но уже есть интрига. 👉 Перейди по ссылке и несколько раз нажми на выделенную часть изображения, чтобы попасть в закрытую группу: probablynothing.xyz #not #Notcoin
🤝7❤1
🔷 Bubble новый агрегатор маркетплейсов стикеров. Залетаем! Еще один инструмент для покупок и анализа рынка стикеров! Заходим и тестируем! Ссылка на бот: t.me/bubble_market_bot
👍5
🟠Круто, ByBit запустили своё приложение в Телеге! 😠 Интерфейс попроще, но всё основное есть: торговать теперь можно прямо там 🩰
👍3
Стартовал Маркетплейс подарков с 0% комиссий от Roxman - Portals Заходим! Чем больше здоровой конкуренции, тем лучше для индустрии!
👍2
Тайлер, чувак, который много шумел в TON, за последние недели запускает свой NFT-маркетплейс с подарками: @mrkt.
👍9❤1
🖼 Обновление Sticker Store Сегодня ночью Sticker Store проходил тех осмотр, после которого было добавлено несколько новых апдейтов: — Добавлены кнопки «Mint» и «Send»; — Появились плашки «Owner» и «Collection»; — Во вкладке «My Collection» всем приобретенным пакам сделали вид, как у подарков; — Прикрутили номера наборов и суплай. — В Sticker Store вышли новые стикеры от CATTEA, цена: 888, всего 8888 шт. 🐾 Можн…
👍7❤2🔥1
Бегал по Telegram от скуки и наткнулся на новый проект с возможным дропом MemHustle. Поиграл пару минут — понравилась механика, решил поделиться с вами. Как по мне, ребята сделали топовый проект. Пока одни клепают очередные кликалки, пытаясь выжать максимум денег из пользователей, другие действительно стараются и создают качественный продукт. У таких команд есть шансы собрать пару миллионов пользователей, но они вы…
👍3🔥1
Major во всех своих каналах заявляет, что их токен вырос на 50%, но, похоже, этого никто, кроме них самих, не замечает. Цена токена упала, и такой рост не спасает многих инвесторов, ведь они закупались по $1. После десятикратного падения рост на 50% не выглядит впечатляющим. К тому же, ребята "забывают" упомянуть, что провели пиар-кампанию и закупили рекламу, чтобы создать видимость активности. Покупка карточки Пав…
👏4👍1
Батя едет домой 🌲
🔥4🎉1
🎄 TON → USD (−0.42%) 📉 1 $TON = 2.922700 $USD
🔥3😱1
🐾Вывод PAWS на биржу открыт! Если вы, как и я, проспали этот момент, самое время поторопиться — вывести можно только до 16 числа. Как сделать заявку на вывод: 1️⃣ Заходим на сайт: paws.community 2️⃣Переходим в TG Dashboard и подключаем кошелек. 3️⃣ Жмём Next затем Claim 4️⃣Заходим на свою биржу копируем UID и адрес депозита $PAWS 5️⃣ Возвращаемся на сайт, выбираем биржу и вводим UID и адрес $PAWS При выводе на бир…
🙂VOID закрытое бета-тестирование завершено ♥️Если у вас не было возможности поиграть во время бета-теста, заходите сейчас! Лично мне игра понравилась, надеюсь, она вам тоже зайдёт. 💔В игре не будет токена, но награды будут регулярно распределяться в $NOT среди активных игроков. 🚀Перейти в бот
👍2🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Iboughtcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 470,038 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Iboughtcrypto named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Я купил крипту 😎 а ты?” (@Iboughtcrypto), 9,241 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Iboughtcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.