Channel
@I_LOVE_ECG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,666subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002174939518 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @I_LOVE_ECG |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/I_LOVE_ECG |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 2,666 | +5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 2,661 | +9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 2,652 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:22 | 2,653 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (11 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 860 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
КОНТИНУУМ ВАРИАЦИЙ СЕГМЕНТОВ ST В НОРМЕ И ПАТОЛОГИИ Существует целый континуум вариантов нормы и патологии сегмента ST, которые зависят от возраста, пола, национальности, перенесенной патологии и с наличием некоторых фенотипов феномена ранней реполяризации желудочков, патологии сердца. Кроме того, на сегмент ST может повлиять фильтры для стабилизации изолинии, я эту тему не раз освещал уже. И так, предлагаю ознаком…
File, posted without a caption
Пороговые значения элевации ST используются для рабочего диагноза инфаркта с подъёмом ST, но изолированно инфаркт не подтверждают. Элевацию измеряют в точке J минимум в двух смежных отведениях; для V2–V3 учитывают пол и возраст. В исследовании HELIUS возрастно-половые пороги превышали 2,76% условно здоровых участников: 6,15% мужчин и 0,70% женщин. Это наблюдение, а не оценка диагностической точности у пациентов с бол…
Photo, posted without a caption
НЕЙРОСЕТЬ И ЭКГ. ЧАСТЬ 1. И так, представьте «простую» нейросеть для оценки аномалии комплекса QRS. Как именно она может определять причину аномального QRS? Такая модель анализирует не один критерий, а сочетание множества признаков. На вход поступают 12-канальная ЭКГ, серийные записи, клинический контекст и при необходимости лабораторные данные. Сначала выполняется предобработка: удаление артефактов, нормализация …
Посмотри на эту элевацию ST, она не то, о чем Вы подумали. Это не окклюзионный процесс, а вторичные изменения реполяризации на фоне ГКМП. Механизм формирования такого фенотипа на ЭКГ: генетически-молекулярные механизмы опосредующие ГКМП вызывают неоднородность (к примеру) потенциалов действия => неодновременная деполяризации и реполяризация => градиенты трансмембранного потенциала => локальные токи => результирующи…
Продолжаем диффдиагностику причин отклонения сегмента ST 1) Ширина комплекса составляет 150 мс (шире 120 мс) 2) Морфология соотносится с ПБЛНПГ 3) Отклонения ST-T будут носить вторичный характер по отношению широкому комплексу 4) Для клинической оценки ПБЛНПГ сопоставляйте ЭКГ с клинико-анамнестическим контекстом, выполняйте серийную запись, при необходимости тропонин по временным точкам и модифицированные критерии …
File, posted without a caption
Smith S. W., Zvosec D. L., Sharkey S. W., Henry T. D. ЭКГ при остром инфаркте миокарда: практическое руководство по реперфузионной терапии / пер. с англ. А. Юнга. — 2026. Наконец-то дошли руки до работы над переводом книги Smith S. W., Zvosec D. L., Sharkey S. W., Henry T. D. «ЭКГ при остром инфаркте миокарда: практическое руководство по реперфузионной терапии». На текущем этапе перевод завершён полностью, идёт этап…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @I_LOVE_ECG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Блог по ЭКГ” (@I_LOVE_ECG), 2,666 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/I_LOVE_ECG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.