Channel
@I_K_4
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,558subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002007549337 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @I_K_4 |
| Created | 29 November 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/I_K_4 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 5,558 | -20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 5,578 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 5,580 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 5,580 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 29 November 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,005 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 662 | 65.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 100 | 9.95% | |
| 👍 | 65 | 6.47% | |
| 💋 | 33 | 3.28% | |
| 🥰 | 33 | 3.28% | |
| 💔 | 27 | 2.69% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 1.79% | |
| 🍓 | 17 | 1.69% | |
| 💘 | 17 | 1.69% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 1.19% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 0.796% | |
| 🌚 | 7 | 0.697% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 0.199% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.199% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.1% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,005reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 November 2023 to 27 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @I_K_4. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 November 2023 to 27 December 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
كان حديثي مع الله مُختصراً جداً بدأ ببُكاء وانتهى ببكاء وما بين البُكاء .. بُكاء ومناجاة بنداءه (يا رب) لكنني على يقين بأنه استمع لقلبي أليس هو الذي يعلم السر وما يخفي؟ سيُنجيني الله سينتشلني بما أنا فيه يقيناً..
👍52❤22🥰6🔥4
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤26🍓5🥰2
اما الأن كل شيئ لك إلا أنا.
💋20
ربما لم تحبني.. ليس في الأمر شك لأن كل أفعالك تبدي ذلك.. او ربما كنت شفاءًا لقلبك.. او سدا لفراغ قصة عشقتها... ربما أعجبت بي في أيام وفي لحظات معينة.... ربما وربما وربما.. لكن صدقي لن تنساني حتى وإن لم تحبني يوما... حتى وإن انكرت ذلك لكن قلبك يدرك هذا جيدا ستذكرك بي أشياء كثيرة ستذكرني عندما تنادي بإسم يشابه إسمي عندما ترى شيئ له علاقة بمدينتي سيذكرك بي مقطع من أغنية، أو كلمة لا نقولها إلا انا وانت ستتذكر حنيتي معك ح…
❤🔥52
علمتُ بأني بدأت أنساك، حينما توقفت عن مراقبتك دون قصد وحينما لم أعد أشعر بالغيرة من أحاديثك وحينما لم أتذكر حوارنا الأخير وحينما صرت أغفو وأستيقظ دون أن أتفقد هاتفي، لم أقصد نسيانك صدقني حدث ذلك حينما كنت منشغلة بالبحث عن سببٍ يجعلني أغفر لك.
💔24💘3
أنا اعلم أنك لن تقرأي هذه الرسالة، لكني أعدك ان ازورك في قبرك وأحدثك عن هذه الرسالة. أود أخبارك بأنني لم أنَم مُنذُ رحيلك عني، لم يأتيني النوم، لا أعرف لما كلّما أردت أن أخلد للنوم أسمع صوتِك يُناديني وأقوم.
❤🔥34❤7💘3
لا يمكن ان يدوم الود بين اثنين اعطى احدهما اذنه لطرف ثالث.
💯12💋11🍓7❤4🕊4💘2
ما فائدة حُبك وأنت لا تتواصل معي ولا تطمئن علي؟! ولا تهتم بي، ولا تساندني، ما فائدة هذا الحب؟
👍9🥰7❤6🔥6💘3🕊2☃1🌚1
ثم لا نعود ابداً كما كنا.
❤10🔥3🥰2💘1😢1
وأنا أغسلُ وجهي من البكاء، كنتُ أسمع قلبي يتأسّف لي دائماً.
❤19🥰4💔3🌚2💋2🕊2🔥1
لم تعُد ملاكي ، كسرت خاطري وشعوري كثيراً ، بعد الأنتهاء المكالمة بيننا وقفت ، منبهرة ، مُتلبدة الشعور ، شعرت بثُقلي عليك بدوت قاسياً علي جداً ، كم هو مؤذي جداً ما رأيته منك..
❤18🌚2🔥2😍2👍1👎1
لا تُحدثني عن الألم.. لقد رأيت شخصي المُفضل وهو يتخلى عني بالتدريج ، رأيته وهو يُهملني عني ويختار غيري فى نهاية المطاف. لقد عايشت ُ ألم تجاهل ابتعادي ، وعدم التجاوب مع مشاعري ، والاسوأ إنكار ألمي.. ظللت مكاني أتساؤل: أكان لي مكان فى قلبه من الأصل أم كنتُ مجرد فترة عابرة؟
❤26❤🔥2🌚2🍓1👍1
Signed ٰ 𝖥𝖺𝗐𝗓y𝖺 .
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @I_K_4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,301,642 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مَتى؟” (@I_K_4), 5,558 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/I_K_4.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.