Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ابيات .

Channel

ابيات .

@IZZ7l

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,393subscribers

-89 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001649291714
TypeChannel
Username@IZZ7l
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/IZZ7l

Growth

4,3934,4824,437.57 August 2026 — 4,482 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,480 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,465 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,449 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,428 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,413 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,393 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 16 days, net -89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,380–4,495 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 00:344,393-20
20 Aug 2026, 00:194,413-15
16 Aug 2026, 17:244,428-21
13 Aug 2026, 11:364,449-16
10 Aug 2026, 10:454,465-15
7 Aug 2026, 14:474,480-2
7 Aug 2026, 13:334,482first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4,950 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51885261752568579471,14623.2%
custom 518826757098099871177915.7%
custom 51886330340431837534318.71%
custom 51881964806823160593276.61%
custom 53551922780989169193176.40%
custom 53549821983635668743066.18%
custom 51882609696162649642925.90%
custom 51882713634371199652835.72%
custom 53548873139460654932705.45%
😭2414.87%
custom 53549891304407843272374.79%
custom 51885634298031843171322.67%
💋1102.22%
🍓741.49%
custom 518838292091766620540.081%
10.02%

Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,950reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 November 2025 to 10 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
217
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 20 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
36
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IZZ7l. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 November 2025 to 10 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 May 2026, 16:30 UTC≈4,670 views78 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓74💋4

Signed سجاد سالم

29 Apr 2026, 13:21 UTC≈5,450 views107 reactions21 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💋1061

Signed سجاد سالم

4 Apr 2026, 22:01 UTC≈7,070 views132 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 5188563429803184317132

6 Mar 2026, 22:11 UTC≈10,300 views207 reactions36 Starsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 5188526175256857947207

14 Feb 2026, 21:00 UTC≈12,900 views237 reactions21 Starsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 5354989130440784327237

31 Jan 2026, 21:00 UTC≈15,200 views270 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 5354887313946065493270

19 Jan 2026, 21:00 UTC≈17,800 views306 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 5354982198363566874306

8 Jan 2026, 21:00 UTC≈20,400 views317 reactions23 Starsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 5355192278098916919317

3 Jan 2026, 00:55 UTC≈21,100 views241 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

قناتي المفضله 🤩 - @d_19g .

😭241

Signed Dhurgham Majeed

29 Dec 2025, 21:00 UTC≈22,700 views287 reactions19 Starsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 5188271363437119965283custom 51883829209176662054

18 Dec 2025, 21:00 UTC≈24,500 views292 reactions8 Starsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 5188260969616264964292

Signed سجاد سالم

10 Dec 2025, 21:00 UTC≈25,300 views330 reactions14 Starsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 5188196480682316059325custom 51885261752568579475

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IZZ7l. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 601,464 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ابيات .” (@IZZ7l), 4,393 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IZZ7l.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.