Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IWNT

Channel

IWNT

@IWNTnews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

105subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001012182455
TypeChannel
Username@IWNTnews
Descriptionانجمن جوشکاری و آزمایش های غیر مخرب ایران
CreatedBetween 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/IWNTnews

Growth

1059 Aug 2026, 16:17 — 105 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 16:30 — 105 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 16:179 Aug 2026, 16:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 104–106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 16:30105no change
9 Aug 2026, 16:17105first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 August 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.6%
avg views ÷ 105 subscribers
Avg views / post
19.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held20 (25 August 202227 July 2026)
Views total39
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
131
Videos
8
Links
33

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC20 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ISO3834File

جدول راهنمای اعتباربخشی به نهادهای ارزیابی انطباق در صنعت جوشکاری و آزمایش های غیرمخرب👆 متخصصین و دست اندکاران محترم صنعت بزرگ جوشکاری و آزمایش های غیر مخرب لطفا در اطلاع رسانی ما را همراهی فرمایید.

29 Jun 2026, 09:01 UTC39 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ISO3834Photo

🚨 چرا مدرک VT معادل گواهینامه بازرس جوشکاری نیست؟ در راهنمای صدور گواهینامه بازرس جوشکاری CWB بر اساس CSA W178.2، مدارک برخی نهادها مانند AWS، TWI و API برای شناسایی و معادل‌سازی پذیرفته شده‌اند؛ اما مدرک VT مبتنی بر ASNT SNT-TC-1A در این فهرست قرار ندارد. ❓ علت چیست؟ 🧩 ASNT SNT-TC-1A یک نظام صلاحیت‌دهی مبتنی بر کارفرما برای روش‌های NDT است؛ یعنی فرد برای اجرای یک روش مشخص مانند VT ارزیابی می‌شود. 🏅 گواهینامه بازرس ج

29 Jun 2026, 09:01 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ISO3834Photo

📌 جای خالی مهندسی جوشکاری در تصمیم‌گیری‌های تخصصی ⚠️ در بسیاری از حوزه‌های مرتبط با جوشکاری، ارزیابی و بازرسی فنی، تصمیم‌ها گاهی بدون حضور مؤثر متخصصان دارای صلاحیت جوشکاری انجام می‌شود. 🔩 جوشکاری فقط یک عملیات اجرایی نیست؛ بلکه دانشی تخصصی شامل: 🧪 متالورژی | 📐 طراحی اتصالات | 🔍 بازرسی و آزمایش | 🏗️ رفتار سازه | 📋 تضمین کیفیت ❌ پیامدها: 🔸 ارزیابی‌های غیرتخصصی 🔸 کاهش تشخیص ریسک و عیوب 🔸 افزایش دوباره‌کاری و هزینه‌ها 🔸

29 Jun 2026, 09:01 UTC17 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ISO3834Photo

🚨سندروم حذف شغل در صنعت بازرسی سازه‌های فولادی🚨 گاهی حذف مشاغل تخصصی در صنعت نه به دلیل فناوری یا کمبود پروژه، بلکه نتیجه طراحی اشتباه نقش‌ها، مسئولیت‌ها و مدل‌های اقتصادی است. در صنعت بازرسی سازه‌های فولادی، سه عامل مهم موجب این روند شده‌اند: نخست، انتقال نادرست مسئولیت کیفیت از سازنده به بازرس کارفرما؛ به‌گونه‌ای که حضور بازرس به اشتباه جایگزین کنترل کیفیت داخلی تلقی می‌شود. دوم، دیمانسیون غلط در قیمت‌گذاری خدمات

29 Jun 2026, 09:01 UTC12 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ISO3834Photo

یا ایهالناس... "بازرسی جوشکاری" welding inspectionبرنامه ای گسترده است که "آزمایش چشمی" visual test یک بخش کوچک آن است👆 بازرس فرایند جوشکاری می تواند از ابزار"قضاوت مهندسی" استفاده کند اما اپراتور آزمایش چشمی اجازه ندارد از آن استفاده کند🚨 یک بازرس جوشکاری سطح ۲ حدود ۸۰ ساعت الزامات آموزش دارد در صورتی که الزامات آموزش اپراتور VT آزمایش چشمی از نصف آن هم کمتر است!🚨 لطفا این دو مدل گواهینامه را هرگز همتراز و هم سط

29 Jun 2026, 09:01 UTC15 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ISO3834Photo

موضع رخ شه نهی ویرانی است موضع شه فیل هم نادانی است عدل چه بود وضع اندر موضعش ظلم چه بود وضع در ناموقعش 🚨از هر متخصصی باید متناسبا در جای خود و بر اساس شایستگی و توانمندی های گواهی شده اش استفاده کرد.

29 Jun 2026, 09:01 UTC18 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ISO3834Photo

مقایسه انواع مدارک شناخته شده در جوشکاری و آزمایش های غیر مخرب....پرچم دار با ختلاف مهندس بین المللی جوشکاری IWE است👆 و البته کمترین تعداد ساعت متعلق به سیستم SNT TC 1A است.

29 Jun 2026, 09:01 UTC19 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ISO3834Photo

مقایسه دو سیستم گواهی کردن ISO 9712 و SNT TC 1A... به نظر شما کدام یک قابل اعتماد تر است؟

29 Jun 2026, 09:01 UTC27 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ISO3834Photo

لطفا در صورت مفید دانستن این مطلب آن را برای دوستان متخصص خود در جوشکاری و آزمایش های غیرمخرب ارسال فرمایید.👆

29 Jun 2026, 09:01 UTC26 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ISO3834Photo

چرا بازرسی جوشکاری (CWI) بسیار جامع تر از آزمایش چشمی جوش(VT) است👆

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IWNTnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IWNT” (@IWNTnews), 105 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IWNTnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.