Фраза «никаких изменений» быстро превращается в roadmap Отправь команде, которая уже обсуждает миграцию.
💯2

Channel
@ITSpaceForum
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
704subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002194806174 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ITSpaceForum |
| Description | ИТ ПРО объединяет ключевых игроков российского рынка технологий. Форум «ИТ Пространство 2026» прошел 2 апреля в Московской школе управления Сколково и собрал 1700 представителей ИТ-рынка. https://it-space.tech |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ITSpaceForum |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 704 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 704 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
94 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 29 | 30.9% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 27.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 8.51% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 7.45% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 7.45% | |
| 🫡 | 7 | 7.45% | |
| custom 5463302596418638794 | 6 | 6.38% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 2.13% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 2.13% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ITSpaceForum. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 26 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Фраза «никаких изменений» быстро превращается в roadmap Отправь команде, которая уже обсуждает миграцию.
💯2
Сегодня у вас случилась стабилити? ❤️ — Да, и это прекрасно 🔥 — Почти, но слежу за дашбордом 👀 — KPI держатся, но я начеку
❤🔥3🔥3😁3
Сколько пунктов получилось? 👇
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
💻 Сколько правил кибербезопасности вы соблюдаете? Коллеги, подготовили для вас мини-игру. Отметьте каждый пункт, который у вас включен и работает как надо.
✏ Будущее ИТ-архитектуры крупного бизнеса — за гибридными инфраструктурами Популярность контейнеров и микросервисов в последнее время заметно выросла, однако они едва ли полностью вытеснят привычные виртуальные машины. Директор по развитию дистрибуции Orion soft Тимур Мустафин уверен, что рынок движется в сторону надежных совмещенных решений, которые помогают компаниям сохранять стабильность. «Контейнеры сейчас оче…
🤝1custom 54633025964186387941
Скрытые издержки владения серверами… Хороших выходных, коллеги! ❤️
💯3😁3🫡2
✏ Внедрять ИИ-агентов в бизнес-процессы необходимо через тестирование на реальных задачах и в безопасном контуре Технический лидер Bercut Алексей Чистяков на форуме «ИТ Пространство» напомнил, что по-настоящему эффективная интеграция ИИ в уже устоявшуюся структуру компании требует прагматичного подхода. Вместо тестирования технологий на второстепенных задачах стоит запускать ИИ-агентов в реальные рабочие процессы па…
🔥3👍2💯2
Оборотные штрафы за ИИ, рост кибератак на бизнес и новые ИТ-решения — ИТ-дайджест недели 🤖 Замглавы Минюста предложил ввести оборотные штрафы за нарушения на ИИ-платформах Для владельцев интеллектуальных платформ стоит предусмотреть ответственность за нарушения по содержанию ИИ-контента, если он вредит национальным интересам России, в том числе финансовую в виде оборотных штрафов. 🔐 ИИ-агенты стали источником ИБ-и…
👍4❤🔥2🔥2
Российский софт становится все более востребованным По словам заместителя генерального директора Р7 Антона Мостового, пользователи все чаще отказываются от пиратского зарубежного софта в пользу надежных лицензионных российских решений. «Люди начинают понимать, что, когда они берут пиратский продукт, он не гарантирует им как минимум сохранность того, что они создали, а ведь самое ценное, что производит человек, — э…
👍4🔥3🫡2
✏ B2B-клиенты перенимают привычки из розничной торговли и все чаще выбирают пункты выдачи вместо классической доставки Поведение покупателей в сегменте корпоративных продаж меняется под влиянием розничного опыта. Сегодня доступность и удобство пунктов выдачи заказов стали привычной реальностью для каждого человека, и этот тренд активно проникает в бизнес-среду. Руководитель управления корпоративных продаж «Ситилинк…
👍2
Рекордная выручка Nvidia, новые правила обучения ИИ в РФ и тренды импортозамещения на ЦИПР-2026 — ИТ-дайджест недели 🚀 Квартальная выручка Nvidia достигла рекордных $81,6 млрд В первом квартале 2026 финансового года американская технологическая компания зафиксировала рост выручки на 85% в годовом выражении. Рекордные показатели обусловлены продолжающимся глобальным бумом в сфере искусственного интеллекта и высоким …
❤🔥3👍2🔥2
✏ Команды из трех человек и десяти ИИ-агентов выполняют задачи в несколько раз быстрее традиционных штатов Искусственный интеллект превосходит человека во многих рабочих процессах, поэтому ключевой задачей сотрудников становится не конкуренция с технологиями, а управление ими и создание собственных цифровых помощников. Об этом рассказал технический лидер Bercut Алексей Чистяков. «Не можете подавить революцию — возг…
🔥3🤝1🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ITSpaceForum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сколько пунктов получилось? 👇
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 26 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 297,783 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИТ ПРО” (@ITSpaceForum), 704 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ITSpaceForum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.