3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,302–2,303 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 19:07
2,302
-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:51
2,303
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:37
2,303
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.56%
avg views ÷ 2,302 subscribers
Avg views / post
197
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
20 (16 May 2026 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
197
Reactions total
9
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 27s
Average length
1m 49s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
80 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
52
65.0%
👏
9
11.3%
🔥
7
8.75%
🆒
3
3.75%
🤩
3
3.75%
💔
2
2.50%
😍
2
2.50%
❤🔥
1
1.25%
💯
1
1.25%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ISF_IMSA. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 May 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚀 AI Bridge 2026 | پلی میان دانشگاه، صنعت و آینده
از پژوهش تا محصول | از ایده تا بازار
هوش مصنوعی دیگر یک فناوری آینده نیست؛ امروز نیروی محرک تحول در صنعت، کسبوکار و پژوهش است.
AI Bridge 2026 رویدادی است که برای ایجاد ارتباطی واقعی میان دانشگاه، صنعت و بخش خصوصی طراحی شده؛ جایی که پژوهشگران، مدیران، متخصصان، کارآفرینان و علاقهمندان هوش مصنوعی گرد هم میآیند تا درباره مسیر تبدیل ایده به محصول، توسعه فناوری، تجاری…
✨️ خشت دوم | جلسه سوم و پایانی ✨️
آخرین خشت را محکمتر از همیشه بگذار! 🧱💙
در سومین و آخرین جلسه از مجموعه کارگاههای «خشت دوم»، میزبان دکتر پریناز فرهاد خواهیم بود تا درباره مسیر موفقیت در علوم پایه، روشهای مطالعه مؤثر و تجربههای ارزشمند دوران دانشجویی گفتگو کنیم.
👩🏻⚕️ دکتر پریناز فرهاد
▫️ دانشجوی اینترن پزشکی
▫️ رتبه ۱ معدل ورودی مهر ۹۹
▫️ جزو ۲.۵٪ برتر علوم پایه
📅 شنبه ۳۰ خرداد ۱۴۰۵
🕔 ساعت ۱۷
این فرصت را ا…
🧱 خشت دوم | جلسه دوم
موفقیت در پزشکی فقط به ساعتهای طولانی مطالعه محدود نمیشود.
گاهی تفاوت میان دانشجویان از انتخاب منابع مناسب، شناخت مسیر، مدیریت زمان و استفاده از تجربه افرادی آغاز میشود که پیش از ما این راه را پیمودهاند. ✨
در دومین جلسه از مجموعه کارگاههای «خشت دوم» میزبان دکتر امیرحسین ادیبزاده خواهیم بود؛
👨⚕️ دانشجوی اینترن پزشکی
🏅 رتبه ۲۲ منطقه ۱ کنکور سراسری تجربی
📚 قرار گرفته در جمع ۲.۵ درصد برتر …
🧱 خشت دوم | جلسه اول
هر سال دانشجویان زیادی وارد فیزیوپات میشوند؛
اما همه آنها مسیر یکسانی را طی نمیکنند.
تفاوت معمولاً از جایی شروع میشود که بدانیم چگونه درس بخوانیم، منابع را چطور انتخاب کنیم و از تجربه کسانی که این مسیر را با موفقیت پشت سر گذاشتهاند استفاده کنیم. ✨
در نخستین جلسه از کارگاه «خشت دوم»، میزبان دکتر احمدرضا رجبی خواهیم بود:
👨⚕️ اینترن پزشکی، ورودی مهر ۹۸
🔬 پژوهشگر حوزه سرطان و بیوانفورماتیک
…
انجمن علمی دانشجویان پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان برگزار میکند:
🧱 خشت دوم؛ محکمتر از همان ابتدا 🦾
تازه وارد فیزیوپات شدی و نمیدونی از کجا باید شروع کنی؟ 🫣
رفرنس بخونی یا جزوه؟ 📖
پاتولوژی و فارما رو از کی شروع کنی؟ 💊
چطور درس بخونی که هم بهتر یاد بگیری، هم موقع امتحان از حجم مطالب جا نمونی؟ 🧠
اگر این سوالها برای تو هم آشناست، این کارگاه دقیقاً برای توئه. 👇
✨ کارگاه «خشت دوم» 🔥
آمادگی و نحوه مطالعه در مقطع ف…
مرکز تخصصی آموزش و تحقیقات هوش مصنوعی آیتِک برگزار میکند:
🦷✨ وقتی پای آینده دندانپزشکی، پژوهش و هوش مصنوعی وسط باشد،
کنار هم قرار گرفتن این جمع از اساتید برجسته، متخصصان دانشگاهی و فعالان بینرشتهای اتفاق کوچکی نیست.
در DentyFields قرار است فقط درباره دندانپزشکی حرف نزنیم؛
قرار است از مسیرهای نوین پژوهش، هستههای تخصصی، کاربردهای واقعی هوش مصنوعی و افق پیشروی دندانپزشکی بگوییم؛
آن هم با حضور چهرههایی که هرکد…
ایمساییهای عزیز سلام🤍
برای دوره جدید، در حال تشکیل تیم روابط عمومی ایمسا هستیم و دوست داریم از ظرفیت، خلاقیت و ایدههای شما در این مسیر استفاده کنیم.
اگر به حوزههایی مثل تولید محتوا، طراحی گرافیک، ادیت عکس و ویدئو، عکاسی، فیلمبرداری، مدیریت شبکههای اجتماعی، روابط عمومی یا سایر فعالیتهای رسانهای علاقه دارید، خوشحال میشیم همراه ما باشین🤝
فرقی نمیکنه که تجربه زیادی داشته باشین یا تازه بخواهین که فعالیت در این…
🔻تهیه ۱۱۰ بسته ارزاق
برای خانواده های نیازمند
به مناسبت عید غدیر
🔹شما هم میتوانید با حمایتهای مالی خود در این کار خیر سهیم شوید.
🔸مبلغ کل پروژه: ۵۵۰ میلیون تومان
🔹برآورد هزینه هر بسته: ۵ میلیون تومان
🔸شماره کارت کمکهای مردمی:
5022-2970-0002-1852
بانک پاسارگاد
به نام: موسسه کودکان فرشته ایرانیان
🔹شماره شبا:
IR-120570030281012978985101
🔸شماره حساب:
302.8100.12978985.1
🔹لینک پرداخت مستقیم:
https://payping.ir/@koo…
از نظر شما ایمسا چیه؟😇
اعضای انجمن علمی دانشجویان پزشکی اصفهان به این سوال جواب میدن!
باهامون همراه باشید🌸
————————
📌 IMSA-Isfahan Official Announcement
😉 ISF_IMSA
📱 ISF_IMSA
🌐 ISF_IMSA
📱 ISF_IMSA
✔️ @imsa_isfahan
📧 isf.imsa@gmail.com
چقدر زود گذشت، نه؟ ✨
انگار همین دیروز بود که این دوره رو با یه عالمه ایده، چند تا برگ کاغذ پر از برنامهریزی و کلی انگیزه شروع کردیم.
از اون جلساتِ طولانی و طوفانهای فکری...
تا استرسهای شیرینِ شبِ قبل از برنامهها...
از دویدنها و خستگیهای بعد از هر رویداد...
تا خندهها، رفاقتها و چایخوردنهای دستهجمعی که تو دلِ همین روزای شلوغ شکل گرفت. ☕️💙
ما توی این دوره فقط رویداد برگزار نکردیم؛ ما کنار هم زندگی کردیم، یا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ISF_IMSA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 208,642 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“انجمن علمی دانشجویان پزشکی” (@ISF_IMSA), 2,302 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ISF_IMSA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.