10 measurements spanning 29 days, net -81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,128–5,233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 11:58
5,140
-15
31 Aug 2026, 00:24
5,155
-10
27 Aug 2026, 23:14
5,165
-11
24 Aug 2026, 21:54
5,176
-17
21 Aug 2026, 03:07
5,193
-4
14 Aug 2026, 22:14
5,197
-7
11 Aug 2026, 16:48
5,204
-8
8 Aug 2026, 19:23
5,212
-9
6 Aug 2026, 03:46
5,221
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:32
5,221
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 39s
Average length
1m 13s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
136 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
54
39.7%
👍
43
31.6%
😢
18
13.2%
💔
11
8.09%
👎
4
2.94%
🗿
4
2.94%
💘
1
0.735%
🤷♂
1
0.735%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خبرنگار از روانپزشکا میپرسه:
تا حالاچندتا از بیمارانتان کاملا درمان شدهاند؟
جواب همگی: هیچکدام
پشت این راستی این واقعیته که درمان(Cure)در روانپزشکی، توهم است؛
تنها کاری که ما میکنیم، مراقبت(Care)است تا انسانها شریف بمانند و شریف بمیرند.
@Iran_Psychologyy
پادکست کتاب جیبی - خلاصه کتاب بشر ساده لوح نیست(2)
به چه کسی اعتماد و چه چیزی را باور کنیم
خلاصه کتاب بشر ساده لوح نیست | Not Born Yesterday: The Science of Who We Trust and What We Believe
نویسنده: هوگو مرسیه | Hugo Mercier
ناشر: نشانه | مترجم: مژگان جهانگیر، علی شفیقی
#پادکست #پادچی #کتاب_جیبی
🕎 کانال روانشناسی سیاسی ایران
پادکست کتاب جیبی - خلاصه کتاب بشر ساده لوح نیست(1)
به چه کسی اعتماد و چه چیزی را باور کنیم
خلاصه کتاب بشر ساده لوح نیست | Not Born Yesterday: The Science of Who We Trust and What We Believe
نویسنده: هوگو مرسیه | Hugo Mercier
ناشر: نشانه | مترجم: مژگان جهانگیر، علی شفیقی
#پادکست #پادچی #کتاب_جیبی
🕎 کانال روانشناسی سیاسی ایران
مراقب اصلاحطلبِ درونتان باشید.
از عادل فردوسیپور، ترانه علیدوستی و علی دایی و... بیشتر از آنکه اپوزیسیون یا مخالف جمهوری اسلامی بسازید، واقعیت را ببینید. بخش زیادی از دغدغه این افراد، مثل هر سلبریتی دیگری، حفظ جایگاه، ادامه کار، دیده شدن و ... است.
هیچوقت جملهای را نمیگویند که از چارچوب انتقادهای زرد و مجاز فراتر برود. همان حرفهایی را میزنند که سالها کارشناسان صداوسیما هم با ادبیاتی دیگر گفتهاند؛ با این …
امروز دوباره خاک، فرزندان ایران را در آغوش گرفت… 🖤
کسانی که نه جنگ را خواستند و نه نقشی در آن داشتند، اما سنگینترین هزینه را پرداخت کردند.
خدایا مراقب ایران و فرزندانش باش
#میناب 💔🖤
🕎 کانال روانشناسی سیاسی ایران
☣تقابل ایران، عربستان و پاکستان در سایه جنگ با آمریکا؛ زنجیرهی نبرد
پاکستان هشدار داده اگر عربستان هدف حمله قرار بگیرد، ناچار است برای حمایت از ریاض وارد درگیری شود. به همین دلیل، جمهوری اسلامی تلاش میکند مستقیماً وارد تقابل با عربستان و پاکستان نشود و هزینه درگیری را از طریق نیروهای نیابتی خود منتقل کند.
فعال شدن حوثیها در یمن و تهدید تنگه بابالمندب دقیقاً در همین چارچوب قابل تحلیل است؛ یعنی ضربه زدن به رقبا …
اقدامات ترامپ تا امروز نشون میده که هدفش تغییر رژیم به اون معنایی که خیلیها تصور میکنن نیست؛ بلکه بیشتر دنبال وادار کردن حکومت به تسلیم و بعد از اون، اصلاح رفتار و ساختار اونه.
شخصیتی مثل ترامپ به یک «نمایش بزرگ» نیاز داره؛ و هیچ نمایشی برای اون جذابتر از این نیست که سرسختترین دشمن آمریکا در برابر فشارها کوتاه بیاد و تسلیم بشه. به همین دلیل هم ابتدا سراغ رهبر و سطوح اصلی قدرت رفت و بعد با هدف قرار دادن پایگاه ه…
پیش بینی بازارهای مالی علی الخصوص قیمت نفت در پایان سال ۲۰۲۶ نشان از تنش خیلی زیاد در سطح جهان هست.
بازارهای مالی و سهام آمریکا کم کم در حال سقوط و وارد شدن به یک رکود هستند.
قیمت نفت نیز طبق تحلیل تکنیکال چارت آن در پایان سال ۲۰۲۶ تارگت های وحشتناک 175 و 250 دلار را نشان می دهد که اگر به سمت این قیمت ها حرکت کند و این پیش بینی به واقعیت بپیوندد یعنی اخبار و اتفاقات بسیار بدی در راه است!!!
که به احتمال زیاد هم م…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @IRAN_PSYCHOLOGYY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دقت کردین!
نه کسی تن ماهی میخره ذخیره کنه، نه صف پمپ بنزین شلوغه، نه به ماکارونی های داخل فروشگاه حمله میشه!
نظر شما چیه؟
ترسمون ریخته12%
به جنگ و وضعیت جنگی عادت کردیم18%
به مرحله یه چیزی میشه دیگه رسیدیم19%
پول نداریم، وُسعمون در حد خرید روزانهست21%
همه موارد فوق51%
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روانشناسی سیاسی ایران 🖤” (@IRAN_PSYCHOLOGYY), 5,140 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IRAN_PSYCHOLOGYY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.