Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 506–508 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 11:38
508
+2
13 Sept 2026, 18:40
506
-1
5 Sept 2026, 09:40
507
+1
28 Aug 2026, 09:57
506
no change
27 Aug 2026, 17:30
506
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 21s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
309 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
173
56.0%
🔥
48
15.5%
❤🔥
22
7.12%
🎉
20
6.47%
👏
14
4.53%
🥰
14
4.53%
🍾
7
2.27%
👍
5
1.62%
custom 5330143517727545123
1
0.324%
custom 5332714137258580972
1
0.324%
custom 5332780919705064324
1
0.324%
💋
1
0.324%
💘
1
0.324%
🥴
1
0.324%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔺 🔺🔺🔺🔺
🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺♥️
Поздравляем директора ресторана Rostic's Баумана
Захарову Ольгу 🔺
Ольга, с днем рождения! Пусть твоя жизнь будет такая же яркая, успешная , как наши рестораны в субботний вечер🚀
Желаем бесконечной энергии, идеального тайминга во всех делах, крепкого здоровья и большого личного счастья. Новых побед и всегда полной посадки!👍
Всем добрый день 🤝
В июле ШЕСТЬ ресторанов из 13 обновили свои рекорды по товарообороту 🤩😨
Это исторический прорыв, так много рекордсменов у нас еще не было в 1 месяце 👍🤩
Поздравляю рестораны
Лента
Сити центр
Спутник
Акварель
Гранд
Баумана
Достойная разминка перед августом, спасибо командам ресторанов за прорывные результаты 🫶🫶🫶
Всем привет ☀
Если вы думаете, что получить мерч за баллы из академии невозможно, то вы ошибаетесь!👽
Вот пример нашей дорогой Ольги из ресторана СитиЦентр!
Дождалась своих крутых ачивок!😨
Всем доброго дня ☺️
С задержкой но все же)
Поздравляю Анну Апраксину с успешной сдачей сертификации (bofr) на позицию директора 🫶✌️Аня желаю тебе сил и энергии, чтобы реализовать все задуманное, успехов и прорывных результатов 🤩😏
Поздравляем с днем рождения профессионалов и выдающихся личностей нашей компании: директора ресторана "Доминант" Тетерину Маргариту и директора ресторана "ЛетоСити" Овчинникову Марию!
От всей нашей команды желаем неиссякаемой энергии, значимых достижений, успешной реализации всех начинаний и, безусловно, крепкого здоровья.
Мы вас очень ценим, выражаем глубокое уважение и гордимся вашими успехами❤️
💵💵РОЗЫГРЫШ 💵💵
Ребята, надеюсь, что уже все посмотрели интервью с нашим сотрудником, пока мы его делали , родилась идея одного reels видео😁
📣Условия розыгрыша, необходимо в комментариях под данным постом написать следующую информацию:
1️⃣Написать какая фраза стала ключевой для создание reels.
2️⃣На какой минуте и секунде сотрудник в видео интервью произнес данную фразу.
3️⃣Ваш профиль в ВК должен быть открытым, нуж…
Мы записали для вас интересное мини-интервью с одним из наших сотрудников🤌💥
13 ресторанов, более 300 сотрудников у нас работает, и мы бы хотели чуточку больше узнать о каждом из вас!❤️
Поэтому, если ты хочешь быть следующей звездочкой🌠выпуска, смело пиши нам, и мы приедем к тебе, чтобы взять у тебя интервью🔋
Ну, а пока внимательно смотрите интервью, так как УЖЕ СЕГОДНЯ во второй половине дня вас будет ждать денежн…
Ребята, всем привет 👋
Мы все таки решились весить канал и в телеграмме тоже , так как видим , что основаная часть наших сотрудников именно здесь 🥹
Поэтому все активности , интересные новости будут здесь тоже!🙏
УЖЕ СЕГОДНЯ в 15:00 будет розыгрыш на канале, в ВК!
НЕ ПРОПУСТИ !😎💸💰
А для этого, обязательно внимательно посмотри последние видео на канале, ведь розыгрыш будет по данному интервью!🔥
https://vk.ru/clip-237025763_456239026?c=1
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @IP_lukina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вакансии в Нижнем Новгороде @rabota_novgorode_nizhnem_v · 46,646 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rostic's Team” (@IP_lukina), 508 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IP_lukina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.