Channel
πππππ ππππ ππΌπ πΎπππΎπππ πYOUTUBE
@IPLTOSSZ
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
7,979subscribers
-327 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001384793749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IPLTOSSZ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IPLTOSSZ |
Topic
Sports β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 21:21 | 7,979 | -47 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 8,026 | -35 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 8,061 | -47 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 8,108 | -21 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 8,129 | -11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:36 | 8,140 | -20 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 8,160 | -25 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:14 | 8,185 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 8,206 | -16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 8,222 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 8,233 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 8,233 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 8,247 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 8,260 | -25 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 8,285 | -21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 8,306 | first reading |
Engagement
No public post preview. We read this entry on 25 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it β the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Tossqueen1 Β· 23,611
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 38 here β alongside 37 others β read 18 September 2026
@The_100_Percent_prediction Β· 25,420
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 23 here β alongside 22 others β read 13 September 2026
@MMONLINEBETS Β· 19,131
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 41 here β alongside 40 others β read 24 September 2026
@To_day_match_winner Β· 29,402
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 49 here β alongside 48 others β read 8 September 2026
@SarkariExam_info Β· 362,759
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 75 here β alongside 74 others β read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 5 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππππ ππππ ππΌπ πΎπππΎπππ πYOUTUBEβ (@IPLTOSSZ), 7,979 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IPLTOSSZ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.