Channel
@INXSDeaths
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
416subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002642223487 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @INXSDeaths |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/INXSDeaths |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 416 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 416 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (1 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,754 |
| Reactions total | 106 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
106 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 30 | 28.3% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 17.0% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 14.2% | |
| 🤮 | 12 | 11.3% | |
| 😈 | 6 | 5.66% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 5.66% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 3.77% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 2.83% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.943% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.943% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Another propaganda piece for the Irish popcorn eaters who read the gutter press. What can they do ? 1. Gofundmes to help cancer research 2. Get tested for cancer 3,. Watch more football and Netflix
🔥2
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) did not approve mFlusiva for the seasonal flu; instead, it previously approved Moderna’s combination COVID-19 and influenza vaccine, known as mCOMBRIAX (mRNA-1083), in April 2026. mFlusiva (mRNA-1010) is the standalone seasonal influenza vaccine, which received FDA approval in the U.S. in August 2026 but is still under review by the EMA, Canada, and Australia. mCOMBRIAX is the dis…
🔥2
Expect the HSE, Govt and it's big pharma stakeholders in the once trusted media to do a huge drive on this once the corrupt EMA approves it for Europe. There is no better time than now to warn your parents and grandparents.
NEW - Trump's FDA approves first mRNA-based injection against the flu, produced by the pharma giant Moderna. @disclosetv
🥱2😈2❤1🤯1
I'm putting this on the record right now: If you take the new mRNA flu shot that was just "approved" by the corrupt FDA, you may not only die, but before that happens, you'll be shedding alien protein toxins all over the people around you, like a walking "vaccine fallout" bioweapons factory. You may actually end up killing others, not just yourself. Don't turn yourself into a depopulation weapon for the FDA. That's …
🔥3💯1🤔1
There is no hope for the once trusted newspaper the Irish independent.
🤡5👍2
This is in the gutter press in Ireland today syndicated from some global news feed. This actor who is long forgotten died maybe twenty or more years ago. This is not news it's propaganda/entertainment to normalise sudden death for the popcorn eaters.
💯6
👆there is no link to this document in the article.
https://rense.com/general98/Trump-s-Big-Beautiful-Covid-Vaccine---Death-By-Needle-Depending-On-The-Batch.php Trump’s Big Beautiful Covid Vaccine - Death By Needle…Depending On The Batch From the net 6-4-26 Each and every Covid Vax had a different formula and the lot numbers proved it. Not a theory. Not an interpretation. A dataset. 12,000 lot numbers. Cross-referenced with VAERS adverse event reports. The co…
👍5🤡1🥴1😈1
The once trusted newspaper, The Irish Times syndicating propaganda from Bill Gates funded newspaper, The Guardian. Vax daddy's health secretary, Kennedy has been a monumental disappointment.
🖕2😁2❤1🔥1🤔1🤣1🤯1
It is proposed to gradually reduce it to 4 billion by 2200. It doesn't say how they plan to achieve this but if people haven't yet figured it out they will get there far quicker than they estimate. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/earth-human-population-halved-200-years-resources-b3022756.html
💯3
Scientists have published a paper in the journal ‘Sustainable Development,’ claiming that we need to halve the world’s population in order to “avoid devastating consequences for the environment.” Not end wars, not end geoengineering, not end the poisoning of our food… nope. Just kill off half the humans on earth. https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/article-16013145/Scientists-say-HALVE-Earth-population.html Foll…
😈3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @INXSDeaths. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 660,274 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IRELAND EXCESS AND SUDDEN DEATHS” (@INXSDeaths), 416 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/INXSDeaths.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.