Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓸 𝓢𝓾𝓻𝓹𝓱𝓷

Channel

𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓸 𝓢𝓾𝓻𝓹𝓱𝓷

@INFOmurphn

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

28subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002371114034
TypeChannel
Username@INFOmurphn
Created26 February 2025 β€” measured β€” dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/INFOmurphn

Growth

252826.57 August 2026 β€” 25 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 25 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 26 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 27 subscribers8 September 2026 β€” 28 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 10:0128+1
24 Aug 2026, 10:0827+1
15 Aug 2026, 19:1326+1
11 Aug 2026, 09:4625no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:4125first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 26 February 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC150 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

γ…€γ…€ 🀩 γ‚™γ…€ 𝅄 Φ΄ γ…€ stickers 𝄒𝄒 γ…€γ…€ γ…€γ…€ 🀩 ΠΎΡ‚ π“œΠ΅Ρ€Ρ„Π½γ…€πŸ•Έβ— Φ΄ Χ… β€Œ γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€γ…€ β€ŒοΌΏΧ„ πŸ€©γ…€γ…€β€Œβ€ŒΦ΄ γ…€ΫŸ Λ– πŸ€©ΡΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‹ ΠΏΠΎ Ρ„Π΄ алнст, Π³Π΅Π½ΡˆΠΈΠ½Ρƒ ΠΈ Ρ‚ΠΏ Ρ‚ΡƒΡ‚..!)) πŸ˜Ίγ…€οΈΆοΈΆ ! !

8 Jun 2026, 16:38 UTC550 viewsread 11 August 2026

я ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ Π²Π»Π°Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Ρ† alien stage

29 Mar 2026, 16:16 UTCβ‰ˆ1,120 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

πŸΌπŸΌπ’€π‘Άπ‘Ό'𝑹𝑬 𝑢𝑷𝑰𝑡𝑰𝑢𝑡 𝑨𝑩𝑢𝑼𝑻 𝑴𝑬 🎁 🍼 π‘›π‘œ π‘›π‘’π‘”π‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘£π‘–π‘‘π‘¦..😍

4 Nov 2025, 16:26 UTCβ‰ˆ2,100 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

πŸ§ͺ Ϋ£ β β β β β β πŸŽ€Π΅Ρ€Ρ„Π½ πŸ•Έ πŸ₯ΉπŸ₯Ή 🍼 πŸ–• πŸ₯ΉπŸ₯Ή.30.𝟒9..πŸ₯Ή πŸ₯ΉπŸ₯Ή πŸ₯Ή πŸ₯ΉπŸ₯ΉπŸ₯Ή Ρ‰ΠΏ 𝙖𝙣𝙀𝙣 🎁 π’Šπ’“π’ π’•π’Šπ’π’ 🀩 🀩 π‘ π’‘πŸ”π‘ π’πŸ’π‘ π’‘πŸ— πŸπŸ– 🍼 π™¨π™π™š π™π™šπ™§ 🀩

4 Nov 2025, 16:26 UTCβ‰ˆ2,130 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

γ…€οΈΆοΈΆ 𝑴𝒀 𝑳𝑢𝑽𝑬 𝑳𝑰𝑺𝑻.. 𝄒 γ…€γ…€ π’”π’‰π’Šπ’, π’‹π’π’‰π’π’π’š..

4 Nov 2025, 16:26 UTCβ‰ˆ2,260 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

βœ¨π’˜π’‰π’ 𝒂𝒓𝒆 π’šπ’π’–?

  1. π’‡π’“π’Šπ’†π’π’…π’” 😺20%
  2. 𝒇𝒂𝒏 🀍31%
  3. 𝑼𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 π‘π‘œπ‘šπ‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘–π‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’ π‘€π‘–π‘‘β„Ž π‘šπ‘’. ❓16%
  4. 𝑫𝒐 π’šπ’π’– π’˜π’‚π’π’• 𝒕𝒐 π’ˆπ’†π’• π’‚π’„π’’π’–π’‚π’Šπ’π’•π’†π’… π’˜π’Šπ’•π’‰ π’Žπ’†πŸŽ€13%
  5. 𝑯𝒂𝒗𝒆 π’˜π’† π’Žπ’†π’• π’˜π’†'𝒗𝒆.. 🀩20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @INFOmurphn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Nov 2025, 16:26 UTCAnonymous Poll164 voters

βœ¨π’˜π’‰π’ 𝒂𝒓𝒆 π’šπ’π’–?

  1. π’‡π’“π’Šπ’†π’π’…π’” 😺20%
  2. 𝒇𝒂𝒏 🀍31%
  3. 𝑼𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 π‘π‘œπ‘šπ‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘–π‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’ π‘€π‘–π‘‘β„Ž π‘šπ‘’. ❓16%
  4. 𝑫𝒐 π’šπ’π’– π’˜π’‚π’π’• 𝒕𝒐 π’ˆπ’†π’• π’‚π’„π’’π’–π’‚π’Šπ’π’•π’†π’… π’˜π’Šπ’•π’‰ π’Žπ’†πŸŽ€13%
  5. 𝑯𝒂𝒗𝒆 π’˜π’† π’Žπ’†π’• π’˜π’†'𝒗𝒆.. 🀩20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2025 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ“²π“·π“―π“Έ 𝓢𝓾𝓻𝓹𝓱𝓷” (@INFOmurphn), 28 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/INFOmurphn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.