Channel
@INFOCHANNEL_red
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002374605210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @INFOCHANNEL_red |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 3 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/INFOCHANNEL_red |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 8 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 8 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 January 2025 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
69 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 29.0% | |
| ✍ | 11 | 15.9% | |
| 🍓 | 10 | 14.5% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 13.0% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 8.70% | |
| 🤪 | 5 | 7.25% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 5.80% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @INFOCHANNEL_red. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 January 2025 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
𓊈№13𓊉 𓊈Название: Сладкое 𓊉 ───┓ По всюду сахарная вата, Ею я полностью объята... (￣∇￣) Вата в голове, А сахар во сне! ᐠ( ᐢ ᵕ ᐢ )ᐟ Карамельных снов я всем желаю, Но я ничего не понимаю (｡· v ·｡) Вроде всё-всё-всё плывёт... Не понимаю чувство, вот! (°口°) Ватный туман... Сахарная вода Не рассеивает его, да... ┐(￣ー￣)┌ Но с ватой в голове тоже хорошо, Хотя и не помню я ничего ( ◕ᗜ◕ ) Ничего уже не страшно, Ничего не …
❤1
Ой, ухты...
❤5
𓊈№12𓊉 𓊈Название: Керамика 𓊉 ───┓ Глазурь стекает по небу, Оставляя красивые цвета. Глазурь течет по лесу, Но так будет до конца утра. Янтарь плывет по глазури той, Проявляя истинный цвет свой. ───┛
❤3
𓊈№11𓊉 𓊈Название: Вопрос ― ответ𓊉 ───┓ Как давно я потеряла время? Было ли оно у меня? Ответа нет. Ценила ли я момент? Пустота не даст ответов. Где краски цветов? Существует ли тот, кто ответов не дает? Я лишь бред несу, Поглощая пустоту, Не переполнюсь никогда, Кто самый нужный для меня? ───┛
❤2
𓊈№10𓊉 𓊈Название: - 𓊉 ───┓ 11010000 10100111 11010000 10111000 11010001 10000001 11010000 10111011 11010000 10110000 100000 11010000 10111101 11010000 10110101 100000 11010000 10111010 11010000 10111110 11010000 10111101 11010001 10000111 11010000 10110000 11010001 10001110 11010001 10000010 11010001 10000001 11010001 10001111 11010000 10010000 100000 11010001 10000111 11010001 10000010 11010000 10111110 100000 110100…
❤4🍓2
𓊈№9𓊉 𓊈Название: Прыг-скок 𓊉 ───┓ Прыг-скок, прыг-скок. Я уже врасплох. Прыг-скок, прыг-скок. Это моей фантазии полёт? Прыг-скок, прыг-скок. Это было как ток. Прыг - Скок ───┛
🍓1
𓊈№8𓊉 𓊈Название: Ловушка. 𓊉 ───┓ Бесконечные иллюзии Где реальность? Чувства, звуки! Я уже не смогу тебя обнять И никто не сможет понять Ты Ещё ТУТ? ───┛
🍓1
𓊈№7𓊉 𓊈Название: Удача 𓊉 ───┓ Играй спекталь бесконечно! Правда, актёры те не навечно... Все уйдут, и останется лишь пламя Твое, что сделано из сожаления, Но те не заслужат и прощения... ... Воет ветер, гремит груз... И актёры останутся без него. ... Не нашёл ты кошачий ус... А он останется без ничего. И есть только одно: Терпи, это больно. ───┛
✍1❤1
𓊈№6𓊉 𓊈Название: Без конца 𓊉 ───┓ Можно, просто не чувствовать себя так ужасно? Можно, просто сидеть, как кот, так важно? Могу ли я просто об этом забыть? Можешь ли ты это изменить? Наверное... Я не знаю ответ, Но наверняка это будет простое "Нет". Узнают ли об этом они? Нужно ли им идти? Ладно, увидимся в твоем бесконечном пути... ───┛
🍓2
𓊈№5𓊉 𓊈Название: Маска 𓊉 ───┓ Я лишь над тобою пошутила, И стать им я решила! Ты думал это он, И ты повысил тон... Это была совсем не я, То была лишь пародия! Ты не то подумал, Ты не то увидел! Это была не я, То была лишь пародия! Ты проклял меня раз пять, Это уже сотый "опять"! Конечно, карты не раскрою, Это лишь шутка над тобою! ───┛
𓊈№4𓊉 𓊈Название: Кукольный театр𓊉 ───┓ В руках я ваших - инструмент, А в глазах чужих - яркий момент. В театре этом, все неспроста Любой может куклою стать, да!.. Закончился спектакль, выходят кукловоды на поклон. Но вышли лишь куклы, все, как клон. Неподвижно, смирно стоят... Ожидая, когда их поблагодарят. Зал изумлен, тишина кругом, А за кулисами говорят о том, Кто душу продал, кто страдал? И окутался аплодисмента…
❤2
𓊈№3𓊉 𓊈Название: A, B, NLM 𓊉 ───┓ Любит, не любит, Погадать решила она. Любит, не любит, Зажглась в глазах искра. Любит, не любит, Лепестки быстрей летят. Любит, не любит, Осталось всего два. Любит, не любит, Закончилась игра. ───┛
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @INFOCHANNEL_red. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 530,034 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“➥ ʀᴇᴅsᴛᴏɴᴇ ᶜʰᵃⁿⁿᵉᴸ ! #” (@INFOCHANNEL_red), 8 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/INFOCHANNEL_red.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.