Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بعضُ من سِحر الحروف

Channel

بعضُ من سِحر الحروف

@IMIMlD

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

11,469subscribers

+5,407 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002150213647
TypeChannel
Username@IMIMlD
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/IMIMlD

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,83211,5278,679.56 August 2026 — 6,062 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,046 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,953 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,832 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,976 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,009 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,125 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,239 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,543 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,506 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,658 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,319 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,844 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,834 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,738 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,940 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,086 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,191 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,208 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,169 subscribers25 October 2026 — 9,166 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,316 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,438 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,062 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,150 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,155 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,432 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,394 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,527 subscribers9 November 2026 — 11,491 subscribers11 November 2026 — 11,469 subscribers11,4696 August 202611 November 2026
31 measurements spanning 97 days, net +5,407. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,978–12,381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 14:5111,469-22
9 Nov 2026, 17:1011,491-36
8 Nov 2026, 09:3511,527+133
7 Nov 2026, 02:0011,394-38
6 Nov 2026, 02:5611,432+277
5 Nov 2026, 01:4711,155+1,005
3 Nov 2026, 22:4410,150+88
2 Nov 2026, 22:0610,062+624
30 Oct 2026, 18:369,438+122
28 Oct 2026, 03:599,316+150
25 Oct 2026, 00:389,166-3
21 Oct 2026, 21:519,169-39
18 Oct 2026, 21:479,208+17
15 Oct 2026, 11:569,191+105
12 Oct 2026, 13:119,086+146
5 Oct 2026, 09:378,940+202
27 Sept 2026, 09:018,738-96
18 Sept 2026, 12:388,834-10
14 Sept 2026, 12:378,844+1,525
11 Sept 2026, 04:017,319first reading

Engagement

340 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.93%
avg views ÷ 11,469 subscribers
Avg views / post
336
251 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
257
of 340 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 129 of 251 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held340 (24 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total84,260
Reactions total4,565
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 10:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7,408 reactions across 171 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 628964652168826702686611.7%
custom 629843321732203252585911.6%
custom 628971673151865509381711.0%
custom 62895177456838330627199.71%
custom 58548997915693623105767.78%
custom 62893820891417877775307.15%
custom 62893575949432987044786.45%
custom 52265909628677876843885.24%
custom 52266184635433836663214.33%
custom 58390898494490618902753.71%
custom 59767681399736308012653.58%
custom 59675121074936301242273.06%
custom 62893548633440987841882.54%
custom 59024864787258462401722.32%
custom 60015223600777893101712.31%
custom 58821723056179853451562.11%
custom 52265397367928499611532.07%
custom 6289496807718263360690.931%
custom 5908839388191661581390.526%
custom 6298325241844210164210.283%
12 further kinds1181.59%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 173 of the 340 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,408 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 340 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8,251
across the posts below
Posts paid on
41
of 333 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
856
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @IMIMlD. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 340 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 28 of 257 posts held from the last 30 days (10.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 10:16 UTC22 viewsread 11 November 2026

مش مصوت هنا مافي مقتني عفوا حتي لو موجه لعشرين معهم مميز

11 Nov 2026, 10:16 UTC23 viewsread 11 November 2026

سحب علي خاتم 💍💍 يستحق فقط بدون تكرار ونكون اسرع شوي • الشرط ⚶ ❶الــتــعـليق >> هــــنــــا 🔒 هذا السحب مخصص لمستخدمي تيليجرام (المميز) فقط. روليت سراب > جميع السحوبات

Signed روليت سراب 2

11 Nov 2026, 09:44 UTC83 viewsread 11 November 2026

سحب عالمقتني ده لاصحاب المميز المتفاعلين اللي بيشتركوا بسحوبات التصويت مش متفاعل بالقناه والتصويت لا تحرج نفسك وتشارك 🔒 هذا السحب مخصص لمستخدمي تيليجرام (المميز) فقط. روليت سراب > جميع السحوبات

Signed روليت سراب 2

11 Nov 2026, 09:39 UTC80 viewsread 11 November 2026

عفوا بتأكد منكم صوت صوت الي مغادر او مو مصوت سكب على طول

Signed 𝓜ㅤ 𓏺

11 Nov 2026, 09:38 UTC87 viewsread 11 November 2026

سحب سريع على دبب َوكيك 💍🎁🎂 شرط التصويت هنا بطلب دليل • روليت تناهيد > جميع السحوبات

Signed روليت تناهيد

11 Nov 2026, 09:36 UTC89 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026

مشكلتهم يصوتوا ويغادروا والتصويت ينحذف أوتماتيك لمن يغادروا ولا يجلسوا يضغطوا أكثر من مرة على التصويت وأحيان الضغط الزائد يخصم التصويت وماهم مركزين لذلك اضغطوا مرة فقط.... وبعدين تغادروا قناتي ليش 😔💔ياويلكم من الله أنا مش شريرة أنا طيبة والله وأعتبركم مثل أولادي وقناتي طيبة والله ماتزعل أي أحد🌚

custom 62893548633440987846

Signed نيرڤانا بنت إب.

11 Nov 2026, 09:03 UTC132 viewsread 11 November 2026

صح المنشور متاخر شوي بس تفاعلولي 🌟

Signed ◞ڪيۅتـہࠝ 𓏲

11 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC199 viewsread 11 November 2026

سحب سريع على دبب َوكيك 💍🎁🎂 شرط التصويت هنا بطلب دليل • روليت تناهيد > جميع السحوبات

Signed روليت تناهيد

11 Nov 2026, 03:31 UTC269 viewsread 11 November 2026

مش مصوت هنا مافي مقتني عفوا حتي لو موجه لعشرين معهم مميز

Signed 𝒟𝓡.𝒟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝒐𝑛𝑎

Showing the 12 most recent of 340 posts we hold for @IMIMlD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@IMIMlD edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بعضُ من سِحر الحروف” (@IMIMlD), 11,469 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IMIMlD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.