Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IMAT physics & Mathematics

Channel

IMAT physics & Mathematics

@IMAT_PHYSICS_MATH

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,573subscribers

+62 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002363732749
TypeChannel
Username@IMAT_PHYSICS_MATH
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/IMAT_PHYSICS_MATH

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5111,5731,54226 August 2026 — 1,511 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,511 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,527 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,538 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,561 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,571 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,573 subscribers26 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 21 days, net +62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,502–1,582 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 12:181,573+2
12 Sept 2026, 15:381,571+10
8 Sept 2026, 09:211,561+23
2 Sept 2026, 23:551,538+11
30 Aug 2026, 18:091,527+16
27 Aug 2026, 07:531,511no change
26 Aug 2026, 21:311,511first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.9%
avg views ÷ 1,573 subscribers
Avg views / post
361
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 June 202625 August 2026)
Views total361
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7h 56m
Average length
1h 59m

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

488 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19339.5%
❤‍🔥18137.1%
custom 54156558140797238715811.9%
👌306.15%
custom 5224607267797606837153.07%
👍51.02%
😍40.82%
🤝10.205%
🥰10.205%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 488 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC361 views21 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

📌تحلیل و بررسی سوالات IMAT 2016 ✔️مباحث مهم مرور شده در این تحلیل : فیثاغورس و تبدیل واحد ها ساده سازی سریع عبارات جبری گشتاور حرکت سقوط آزاد مقاومت الکتریکی #IMAT

14custom 54156558140797238714❤‍🔥3

23 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC482 views26 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

بررسی سوالات ریاضی و فیزیک IMAT 2015 مطالب مرور شده در این تحلیل: ✔️قوانین مهم لگاریتم‌ها و ترفندهای سریع Log ✔️مفهوم Dimensional Analysis و تشخیص گزینه درست فقط با بررسی واحدها ⚡تفاوت Energy، Power و Momentum 🌡️ گرما و دما و Specific Heat Capacity، Heat Capacity و Latent Heat ✔️حل سریع دستگاه دو معادله دو مجهول 🔄 مرور همه فرمول های حرکت دایره ای Circular Motion؛ سرعت زاویه‌ای، شتاب و نیروی مرکزگرا 📊میانگین

19❤‍🔥4custom 54156558140797238713

22 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC577 views21 reactionsread 26 August 2026

🔴درود دوستان وقتتون بخیر 📌اولین آزمون شبیه ساز ایمت روز گذشته برگزار شد و تحلیل درس ها هم قرار گرفت ❗️اگر میخواید در دو آزمون بعدی شرکت کنید به آیدی من پیام بدید @masoud_seifii ‼️دوستانی که از قبل پیام دادند و لینک گروه آزمون های شبیه ساز رو دریافت کردند دوباره پیام ندند، همون گروه هست ✔️ همچنین ادامه تحلیل سوالات ریاضی و فیزیک ایمت ها از فردا در این کانال بصورت کاملا رایگان قرار خواهد گرفت 🤍

❤‍🔥135👌3

18 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC987 views35 reactionsread 26 August 2026
File

تحلیل و بررسی سوالات ریاضی و فیزیک ایمت ٢٠١۴ 📌 مباحث مرورشده در سؤالات ایمت 2014: ✔️ اصطکاک و قوانین نیوتون؛ نیروی نرمال، اصطکاک جنبشی و شتاب و ترکیب دینامیک و حرکت شناسی ✔️ چگالی و نیروی شناوری (Buoyancy)؛ ترمومتر گالیله و اثر دما بر چگالی مایعات ✔️ معادله خط؛ شیب، خطوط عمود بر هم و معادله خط از روی نقطه و شیب ✔️ هندسه فضایی؛ مساحت سطح کره و مقایسه کره‌ها با شعاع‌های مختلف ✔️ مغناطیس؛ مواد مغناطیسی، القای مغنا

21❤‍🔥6custom 54156558140797238716👌2

17 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC972 views36 reactionsread 26 August 2026
File

📌بررسی و تحلیل سوالات ریاضی و فیزیک ایمت ٢٠١٣ مباحث بررسی و تدریس شده در این جلسه : ✔️حرکت نوسانی ساده ✔️گشتاور ✔️تبدیل واحد و یکاها ✔️ژنراتور و نیروی محرکه القایی ✔️نامعادلات ✔️معادله دایره ✔️هندسه ✔️لگاریتم #IMAT

19custom 54156558140797238717❤‍🔥6custom 52246072677976068374

16 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC≈1,600 views43 reactionsread 26 August 2026

📌 مباحث تدریس شده بطور کامل در بررسی ایمت ٢٠١٢ : ✔️ نامعادلات و تعیین بازه جواب ✔️ گرما : Calorimetry، ظرفیت گرمایی ویژه و تعادل گرمایی Thermal Conductivity و روابط انتقال گرما ✔️ تمام Phase Changes، گرمای نهان ذوب و تبخیر و نیروهای بین‌مولکولی ✔️ ابررسانا Superconductors و اثرهای جریان الکتریکی ✔️ خازن ها Capacitors؛ فرمول‌ها، انرژی، دی‌الکتریک و خازن‌های سری و موازی ✔️ جمع‌بندی Scalar & Vector Quantities ✔️

👌22❤‍🔥11custom 541565581407972387173

16 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC919 views40 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

تحلیل سوالات ریاضی و فیزیک ایمت ٢٠١٢ با حجم کمتر #IMAT

28❤‍🔥7custom 54156558140797238715

16 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC≈1,380 views32 reactionsread 26 August 2026
File

تحلیل سوالات ریاضی و فیزیک ایمت ٢٠١٢ با کیفیت بالا #IMAT

21custom 54156558140797238717❤‍🔥4

15 Aug 2026, 03:53 UTC≈1,040 views53 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

تحلیل سوالات ریاضی و فیزیک ایمت ٢٠١١ با حجم کمتر #IMAT

❤‍🔥3612custom 54156558140797238715

15 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC954 views34 reactionsread 26 August 2026
File

تحلیل و بررسی سوالات ریاضی و فیزیک ایمت ٢٠١١ با کیفیت بالا #IMAT

❤‍🔥255😍4

15 Aug 2026, 03:50 UTC967 views43 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

🚀 از امروز رسماً شروع می‌کنیم! | IMAT 2011 → 2025 🔥🇮🇹 ☄️از امروز، هر روز سوالات ریاضی و فیزیک یکی از آزمون‌های سال‌های گذشته IMAT رو به‌صورت کامل تحلیل می‌کنیم؛ از IMAT 2011 شروع می‌کنیم و سال‌به‌سال تا 2025 IMAT جلو می‌ریم. ✔️ برای این تحلیل‌ها واقعاً زمان زیادی گذاشته شده؛ ویدیوی هر سال حدود ۲ تا ۳ ساعت هست و سعی کردم سوالات رو مو‌به‌مو بررسی کنم؛ از راه‌حل و تک‌تک گزینه‌ها گرفته تا فرمول‌ها، مفاهیم و نکاتی که ا

❤‍🔥295custom 54156558140797238715👍2custom 52246072677976068372

12 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTCviews —

IMAT physics & Mathematics pinned «🔥جمع بندی سوالات ایمت تحلیل سوالات IMAT از 2011 تا 2025 بصورت کاملا رایگان 🆓 🚀شروع از شنبه ١۵ آگست، ٢۴ مرداد بصورت روزانه 🗓 هر روز = یک سال از آزمون IMAT یک مسیر عالی برای مرور و جمع‌بندی ریاضی و فیزیک IMAT ‼️اما قرار نیست فقط جواب تست‌ها رو پیدا…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @IMAT_PHYSICS_MATH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IMAT physics & Mathematics” (@IMAT_PHYSICS_MATH), 1,573 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IMAT_PHYSICS_MATH.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.