Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ILSANOVÝ - ILSN (рест)

@ILSANOVY

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004204456340
TypeChannel
Username@ILSANOVY
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 4 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ILSANOVY

Growth

3111 Aug 2026, 06:31 — 31 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 17:18 — 31 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 06:3111 Aug 2026, 17:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30–32 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 17:1831no change
11 Aug 2026, 06:3131first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

43 reactions across 4 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5418148449889570224920.9%
custom 5352795136591942749716.3%
custom 5208949943045214121614.0%
custom 5408984926710157962511.6%
custom 532586808823776675649.30%
custom 535305817756901707749.30%
custom 535268909384940334536.98%
custom 535289773906567494336.98%
custom 519070315674025424312.33%
custom 613890160491443584912.33%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ILSANOVY. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 21 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Jun 2026, 17:16 UTC126 viewsread 11 August 2026

Уважаемые участники и все остальные, кф временно уходит в рест. Точно сказать, на какой срок, мы пока не можем. Просим отнестись к этому с пониманием и сохранять спокойствие. Спасибо за понимание. 🤍

16 Jun 2026, 10:27 UTC244 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔤rush list 🔤lsanovy 🛶 🤩Owners: Abylai 🔥 Kathrine 🤩Admins: Asyl 🔥 Balausa 🔥 Amina 🔥 Dilnura 🤩Members: Zhanna 🔥 Shattyk 🔥 Erkesh 🔥 Altair 🔥 Saya 🔥 Nura 🔥 Maralym 🔥 Kausar 🔥 Dilnaz 🔥 Rauan

custom 53530581775690170772custom 54181484498895702242custom 51907031567402542431custom 52089499430452141211custom 53526890938494033451custom 53527951365919427491custom 53528977390656749431custom 61389016049144358491

10 Jun 2026, 07:05 UTC610 viewsread 11 August 2026

🪙ILSN открывает поиск союзов и братств. Также открыты к союзом с архивами. По вопросам взаимодействие и партнёрства обращаться: @sexsenx 🔤се правила и условия сотрудничество представление в архиве.✅

Signed KathRine

7 Jun 2026, 18:38 UTC591 viewsread 11 August 2026

Здравствуйте, дорогие. 😣 Просим вас написать в анон своё мнение о кф. Что вам нравится, что не нравится, что, по вашему мнению, стоит изменить или улучшить. Также можете написать о людях, которые вам симпатичны или, наоборот, с кем вам некомфортно общаться.🙂 Для нас это действительно важно. Благодаря вашим отзывам мы сможем исправить недостатки и сделать кф лучше для всех. Будем ждать ваших честных мнений и предложен

Signed KathRine

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ILSANOVY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,050,624 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ILSANOVÝ - ILSN (рест)” (@ILSANOVY), 31 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ILSANOVY.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.