Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IDK

Channel

IDK

@IDK_What_With

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

6subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002630646393
TypeChannel
Username@IDK_What_With
Created1 April 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/IDK_What_With

Growth

610 August 2026 — 6 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6 subscribers10 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5–7 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:466no change
10 Aug 2026, 04:316first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 1 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 12 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥715.6%
💘715.6%
613.3%
😭36.67%
24.44%
🍾24.44%
🏆24.44%
🕊24.44%
😈24.44%
🤪24.44%
🌭12.22%
🐳12.22%
💅12.22%
💋12.22%
💯12.22%
🔥12.22%
🤣12.22%
🤨12.22%
🤬12.22%
🤯12.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2025 to 12 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 May 2025, 15:01 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Отмена, кит вышел с шорта

💋1🤣1😭1

11 May 2025, 14:20 UTC47 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Подумайте, зачем столько личностей решили создать свой маркет? Мэйби они знают что там будет много ликвы и прибыли?

🏆1🤯1😈1

10 May 2025, 19:07 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пофиксили, но сомневаюсь что норм, все еще можно такое встретить, но реже

🍾1💘1🕊1

9 May 2025, 17:26 UTC47 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ничего не покупайте по маркету, есть трабл с отображением цены, если после того как вы зашли на маркет человек сменит цену на подарок то узнаете вы это только после списания звёзд)

💘3❤‍🔥1😈1

3 Apr 2025, 13:05 UTC159 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️Масштаб ущерба от массового возврата Telegram Stars : 📷Рефнуто 2 995 380⭐️ 📷За ночь забраковано 9882 Telegram подарка! 📷Пострадало минимум 3337 пользователей! 📷Суммарный ущерб $45 000 @IDK_What_With !?!

4❤‍🔥2💘2

2 Apr 2025, 21:04 UTC140 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ТРАМП ВВОДИТ “ВЗАИМНЫЕ ПОШЛИНЫ” Если вы ставите 20% на американские товары — получите в ответ 20% на свои. Красиво звучит? Как будто за справедливость? Что будет на деле: — Товары подорожают. Везде. — Начнётся торговая возня: Китай, Европа, Канада — все ответят. — Снова торговые войны? Да, пожалуйста. — Кто страдает? Обычные люди, экспортёры и рынок. Размеры пошлин: • Китай – 34%; • Европейский союз – 20%; • Вьет

2🏆1🐳1

2 Apr 2025, 21:00 UTC106 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Что я думаю? Всё крутится, бабки текут рекой — и какой смысл это останавливать? Очевидно, скоро нас ждёт ещё больше новых гифтов. Но без мощного хайпа эта тема быстро сдуется. Лучший ход — что-то вроде Sailor Moon: огромные иксы, куча денег и взрывной ажиотаж. Жаль, я сам не успел его прихватить(... А что дальше? Саплай растёт, хайп со временем может угаснуть. Вопрос: будут ли у подарков реально стоящие утилити? С

🍾1💅1🔥1

2 Apr 2025, 20:51 UTC87 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сколько заработал Telegram на подарках? Недавно решил прикинуть, сколько же Telegram поднял на этих самых "подарках". И, честно говоря, цифры меня шокировали. Давайте по порядку: 🚀Старт движухи 28 сентября 2024 года — в Telegram появляется обновление с подарками. В тот же день запускаются два коллекционных гифта — и они разлетаются за 12 часов! Через три дня люди начинают скупать подарки в 2 раза дороже стартовой

❤‍🔥1💘1💯1

1 Apr 2025, 13:02 UTC76 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

😨Тайна дубликатов: Почему NFT-подарки в Telegram торговались ниже флора Это был новый фронтир. Подарки в Telegram, пропитанные звездами, обретали жизнь как NFT на блокчейне TON. Их можно было передать, продать, выставить напоказ. Но под этой блестящей оболочкой зрела трещина — баг, который обернулся хаосом и потерями. 👀Как это работало? 1) Сброс времени. Улучшил подарок за 25 звезд? Жди 21 день до конвертации в NF

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @IDK_What_With. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IDK” (@IDK_What_With), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IDK_What_With.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.