Channel
IDEALTARIX || Xamidbek Muxammadov
@IDEALTARIX
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,489subscribers
+925 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002082657310 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IDEALTARIX |
| Description | Tarixchi-repetitor Muxammadov Xamidbekning Tarix - faniga ixtisoslashtirilgan telegram kanali. Murojaat : @Xamidbek_Muxammadov |
| First recorded | 26 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IDEALTARIX |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 16:06 | 2,489 | no change |
| 26 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 2,489 | +1,009 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 1,480 | +8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 1,472 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 1,475 | -8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 1,483 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 1,482 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 1,490 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 1,494 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 1,505 | -13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 1,518 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 1,522 | -20 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 1,542 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:41 | 1,551 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 1,565 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 1,564 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Tarixdan_quiz_testlar_kanali · 23,682
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 September 2026
@Tarix_Tilsimi_N1 · 28,134
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 September 2026
@Tarixdan_testlar_BH · 29,988
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
@tarixdan_tomchi · 55,260
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
@Tarix_Milliy_Sertifikatl · 42,635
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IDEALTARIX || Xamidbek Muxammadov” (@IDEALTARIX), 2,489 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IDEALTARIX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.