Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ICTick

@ICTick

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,174subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001981958406
TypeChannel
Username@ICTick
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 7 July 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ICTick

Growth

1,1731,1741,173.57 August 2026 — 1,174 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,173 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,173 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,174 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,173–1,174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 22:581,174+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:321,173no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:121,173-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:281,174first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 7 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33m 53s
Average length
6m 47s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

655 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
32048.9%
👍20230.8%
🔥629.47%
❤‍🔥436.56%
🙏152.29%
👏40.611%
🥰30.458%
🍌20.305%
😁20.305%
🤯10.153%
🦄10.153%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 655reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2023 to 15 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Dec 2023, 14:42 UTC≈5,560 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

نکته ی مهم دیگه ای که در مورد این ترید وجود داره، اگر دقت کنید، مایکل بعد از استاپ خوردن ریسکشو نصف می‌کنه(ترید اول 10contract و ترید دوم 5)و بارها در صحبت هاش در مورد مدیریت سرمایه به این نکته اشاره کرده.

25👍7❤‍🔥2

15 Dec 2023, 10:42 UTC≈5,530 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

3-در تایم ۱ دقیقه تغییر ساختار بعد از جمع آوری نقدینگی ها و رسیدن به ایمبالانس ۱ساعته رو میبینیم،همینطور که در ویدیو مشخص هست مایکل روی FVG اول ورود می‌کنه و استاپ میخوره و مجدد روی FVG بعدی ورود میکنه به سمت نقدینگی سمت خرید که مشخص شده. @ICTick

15👍6❤‍🔥1

15 Dec 2023, 10:41 UTC≈5,030 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

⚫️بررسی دلایل ورود : 1-قیمت قبل از انتشار خبر FOMC چه کاری انجام داده؟نقدینگی کف های برابر رو جمع اوری کرده(همینطور نقدینگی کف آسیا و کف لندن) 2-قیمت به کجا رسیده؟ به FVG یک ساعته‌(به واکنش کندل ساعت 13 به FVG دقت کنید). @ICTick

15👍2❤‍🔥1

15 Dec 2023, 10:14 UTC≈4,190 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

لایو ترید مایکل، شاخص نزدک و قبل از انتشار خبر FOMC نکته:اگه اختلاف دیتایی می بینید چارت مایکل روی حالت RTH یا Regular trading hours هست،یه حالتیه که روی چارت های فیوچرز فعال میشه،و در واقع گپ بین کلوز روز گذشته و اپن نیویورک در ساعت ۹:۳۰ رو نشون میده(اون باکس نارنجی که مشخص میکنه همون گپ هست). @ICTick

15👍6❤‍🔥2

3 Dec 2023, 10:51 UTC≈4,430 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#Silver_Bullet تو این ویدیوی کوتاه مایکل در مورد پنجره زمانی سیلوربولت در بازار فارکس توضیح میده، ما قبلا در مورد سیلوربولت در شاخص ها صحبت کردیم و البته گفتیم 10-11 نیویورک برای فارکس قابل استفاده هست؛ اینجا هم مایکل میگه تایم 10-11 نیویورک برای فارکس هم مناسب هست، اما بهترین تایم : ⭕️سشن لندن: 5-3 به وقت نیویورک⭕️ ⭕️سشن نیویورک : 9-7 به وقت نیویورک⭕️ در واقع بهترین زمان سیلوربولت برای فارکس بخشی از بازه ی زمانی

28👍6❤‍🔥1

2 Dec 2023, 12:01 UTC≈3,840 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

1h : قیمت به اردربلاک صعودی در منطقه دیسکانت رنج فعلی رسیده ( من معمولا تو این شرایط هر دو کندل رو به عنوان OB در نظر می‌گیرم اما میتونید اخرین کندل نزولی هم در نظر بگیرین و بستگی به بکتست های خودتون داره) 15m: قیمت به FVG تایم 15 دقیقه داخل اردربلاکمون رسیده و از طرفی یه سویینگ لو (نقدینگی) هم داشتیم‌. نکته ی بعدی : قیمت هم نقدینگی کف روز قبل و هم نقدینگی کف لندن همون روز رو گرفته که نقدینگی های مهمی هستند. 5m: در

👍338❤‍🔥2

2 Dec 2023, 11:45 UTC≈3,340 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

یکی از تمریناتی که به گفته ی خود مایکل می‌تونید انجام بدین،بررسی لایو تریدهای مایکل هست.معمولا ویدیوهای لایو تریدهای مایکل فقط ورود/خروج رو در تایم ۱ دقیقه نشون میده و اکثر اوقات منطق پشتش مشخص نیست.این لایو ترید روی شاخص S&P مربوط به تاریخ ۲۸ نوامبر رو ببینید تا در پست های بعدی بررسیش کنیم. @ICTick

10👍4❤‍🔥1

26 Oct 2023, 00:22 UTC≈4,620 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#DXY شاخص دلار(تایم فریم روزانه) و احتمال حرکت صعودی به سمت نقدینگی مشخص شده که مایکل در توییتر خودش قرار داده‌.

👍21❤‍🔥6🙏21

26 Oct 2023, 00:19 UTC≈4,650 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#Bitcoin تحلیلی که مایکل از بیتکوین در توییتر خودش قرار داده : FVG هفتگی که ذکر کرده به عنوان ناحیه ای برای حرکت ریورسال قیمت و حرکت به سمت نقدینگی سمت فروش تایم فریم هفتگی زیر نظر داشته باشید.

👍25❤‍🔥52

17 Oct 2023, 10:14 UTC≈4,770 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#IFVG یک ویدیو کوتاه از ICT در مورد این که چرا این FVG زرد رنگ رو انتخاب کرده ؟ ما یک Low قدیمی داشتیم ،که قیمت رفته پایین تر و نقدینگی Sellside رو جمع آوری کرده ، در تلاقی با این Low قدیمی ما این FVG رو داریم . وقتی قیمت تغییر ساختار میده و برمیگرده بالای این FVG میتونیم انتظار داشته باشیم به عنوان IFVG عمل کنه و قیمت رو نگه داره. در پایان هم مایکل میگه درسته شدو ها از FVG رد شدن اما برای ما همیشه Body کندل مهم هست.

👍256❤‍🔥6👏1

7 Sept 2023, 10:36 UTC≈6,090 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚫چه زمانی ترید نکنیم ؟ یکی از پروفایل های مارکت که زیاد توجه نمیشه بهش پروفایل Seek & Destroy (S&D) هست. قیمت یه رنج تشکیل میده و نقدینگی های یک سمت رو میگیره و به سمت نقدینگی های مخالف حرکت میکنه. شبیه حالتی که امروز روی چارت یورو/دلار میبینیم. تو این شرایط بهتره ترید نکنیم و یا دنبال حرکت های کوچیک باشیم. 🔴اما چطور تو دردسر نیفتیم؟ 🟢شرایطی هست که باید احتمال تشکیل این پروفایل رو بدین که چند موردش رو که در مورد چ

34👍11❤‍🔥3

28 Aug 2023, 11:11 UTC≈4,720 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @piknikanalyst_educationsFile

■ پی‌دی‌اف ۹ ■ مرور مباحث ICT و خلاصه مطالب با تمرکز بر منتورشیپ ۲۰۲۳ مایکل کانال: @ICTick ■ #خلاصه_منتورشیپ_۲۰۲۳_مایکل ● پی‌دی‌اف نهم ●● قسمت هشتم ♧ موضوع : ◇ FOMC ■ Mentorship 2023 ■ PDF @PiknikAnalyst @PiknikAnalyst_Educations ‌‌PDF 9 ‌ ‌

35👍3👏2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ICTick. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 560,787 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ICTick” (@ICTick), 1,174 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ICTick.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.