3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,041–1,042 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 20:35
1,042
+1
14 Aug 2026, 13:45
1,041
no change
14 Aug 2026, 13:32
1,041
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 1,042 subscribers
Avg views / post
250
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
20 (1 December 2023 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
499
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6h 05m
Average length
45m 39s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
پاسخ شما تاثیر زیادی در برنامههای آیندهام خواهد داشت
شروع مجدد بررسیهای حرکات هفته قبل طلا که کاملا جنبه آموزشی داشته و برای افراد ریزبین دایرکشن مارکت34%
بررسی هفته پیشروی مارکت21%
شروع آموزش در یوتیوب32%
امکان دیدن لایو همیشگی یکی از حسابهای شخصیم (در هرصورت این مورد انجام میشه بعد از رذهاندازی پلتفرم)24%
کانال سیگنال (که هرگز از سمت من انجام نخواهد شد😂)12%
هرچیزی که به سود کردنم کمک کنه رو میپسندم38%
The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
از نگاه من با هیچ ابزار و علمی نمیتوان این دو فاکتور را در کنار هم داشت مگر با تجربه و روانشناسی قدرتمند در مدیریت پوزیشن
چیزی که هرگز نمیشه از کسی یاد گرفت
زمان میخواهد و ماندن و دوام آوردن و هرگز مغرور نشدن به دانستهها
Keep building in silence so you can be proud of your results later
I will soon be sharing some of my work during this time
I want you to understand that to succeed and continue to succeed, you have to stay away from many things.
Stay in shadows
Devil is in details
Everything is about time and price
آیا علاقمند به ادامه این سبک کانال بصورت ویدیوهای آموزشی و کوتاه همراه با توضیحات از زبان بنده هستید؟
بله بسیار مفید و کاملتر خواهد بود92%
نیازی به تغییرات نیست و همین روال کنونی عالیست8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ICT_Sources. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
پاسخ شما تاثیر زیادی در برنامههای آیندهام خواهد داشت
شروع مجدد بررسیهای حرکات هفته قبل طلا که کاملا جنبه آموزشی داشته و برای افراد ریزبین دایرکشن مارکت34%
بررسی هفته پیشروی مارکت21%
شروع آموزش در یوتیوب32%
امکان دیدن لایو همیشگی یکی از حسابهای شخصیم (در هرصورت این مورد انجام میشه بعد از رذهاندازی پلتفرم)24%
کانال سیگنال (که هرگز از سمت من انجام نخواهد شد😂)12%
هرچیزی که به سود کردنم کمک کنه رو میپسندم38%
The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2023 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 202,900 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ICT.Sources” (@ICT_Sources), 1,042 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ICT_Sources.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
