🚨 NO INDIA Vs BANGLADESH SERIES 🚨 - With the Afghanistan series confirmed, the possibility of India touring Bangladesh in September has almost been ruled out. (Cricbuzz).
Signed THE ONE

Channel
@ICTXRCB
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,341subscribers
+69 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002237253652 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ICTXRCB |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ICTXRCB |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
@ICTXRCB was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 1,341 | +74 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 1,267 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 1,268 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:10 | 1,270 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 1,272 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 34 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
251 reactions across 33 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 97 | 38.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 30 | 12.0% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 12.0% | |
| 💔 | 20 | 7.97% | |
| 😭 | 18 | 7.17% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 5.98% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 5.18% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 3.19% | |
| 🗿 | 6 | 2.39% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 1.59% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.20% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.20% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 1.20% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.398% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 NO INDIA Vs BANGLADESH SERIES 🚨 - With the Afghanistan series confirmed, the possibility of India touring Bangladesh in September has almost been ruled out. (Cricbuzz).
Signed THE ONE
🇮🇳 MS ka bhi dalunga wait.!🎀
❤2
Signed Shashvat Ramayan ❯❯——꥟—>
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥4
Signed Shashvat Ramayan ❯❯——꥟—>
MORNING ❤️
❤🔥4❤1
Signed 𓆩𖤍𓆪 𝕬𝖒𝖆𝖓 𝕸𝖎𝖘𝖍𝖗𝖆 🔱
Acha..!!
🔥5
Signed Shashvat Ramayan ❯❯——꥟—>
Editing like this is like a dream for One8 bhai 🥶🥵
😁3💯2❤1
Signed THE ONE
TEAMS HAVE QUALIFIED FOR 2027 ODI WORLD CUP SO FAR 🚨 - South Africa. - Zimbabwe. - India. - New Zealand. - Australia. - England. - Afghanistan. - Pakistan. - Sri Lanka. - Bangladesh.
⚡4
Signed 𓆩𖤍𓆪 𝕬𝖒𝖆𝖓 𝕸𝖎𝖘𝖍𝖗𝖆 🔱
India's Captains on Each Tour of Sri Lanka!
🔥6❤1
Signed THE ONE
McCullum mostly confirmed ?? ✅
💯5
Signed THE ONE
Class me itne ladke the, usne merese pen kiu lia?🧐
😭5
Signed Shashvat Ramayan ❯❯——꥟—>
2015 ✅ 2019 ✅ 2023 ✅ 2027 ✅ Afghanistan has qualified into the 4th Consecutive Cricket World Cup - One of the massive rise of a cricket team.
👍4
Signed THE ONE
Are b*** 😭
🤣8😭3
Signed THE ONE
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @ICTXRCB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ICT X RCB” (@ICTXRCB), 1,341 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ICTXRCB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.