4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -480. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,889–5,513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 09:35
4,961
-179
10 Aug 2026, 14:26
5,140
-239
7 Aug 2026, 19:26
5,379
-62
7 Aug 2026, 02:46
5,441
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 4,961 subscribers
Avg views / post
618
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
18 (12 June 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
3,089
Reactions total
119
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
392 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
208
53.1%
🔥
87
22.2%
💘
54
13.8%
👍
8
2.04%
⚡
7
1.79%
👏
7
1.79%
🫡
7
1.79%
🍾
6
1.53%
🥰
3
0.765%
🤔
2
0.51%
🤝
2
0.51%
🐳
1
0.255%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 392reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ICC_ANNOUNCEMENT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
$YETI sports since 2004.
grabbed a bag of $YETI here arround 260k
OGs know YETI Sports. I was addicted to that game back in 2004. Strong team. They keep shipping. I'm betting big on $YETI.
After “DOOM” reached 6M MC old games are starting to look bull? I think the new meta is starting right now and it's insanely early
BX8np2NYESCYThnWhRMXZytPyybKsbnVEYMPGgWVpump
https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/BX8np2NYESCYThnWhRMXZytP…
OCEAN💧
Only MOO legendary NFT holders can buy in presale, I will personally buy a heavy bag on launch and will support the dips as i believe this one will do good numbers
Try to watch entries on launch
Introducing $OCEAN the first autonomous non-human intelligence designed to build, grow, and defend its own token. No emotions. No ego. Only evolution.
Presale: https://www.cheesepad.ai/sale/bsc/0xf9FbfE00D21b6379623…
$POOCAT — the first launch on @PooDotMeme 💩
Shared by a good guy, ill be watching entries when it goes live as well
They have done some decent projects previously so i believe this will do good numbers
They have a hardcap of 40 Bnb with a max bag
🎟 Whitelist only — 100 spots
🗓 Presale: Jul 21, 17:00 UTC
🚀 Trading live: Jul 22, 17:00 UTC
One price for everyone. 40 BNB cap.
PRESALE💩 :- https://poo.meme/token/0xB66…
$DARK 🪶 (UPDATE)
Migration was successful. We now have over 500 warriors on the Robinhood network. We are ready to move forward. Here is how you actually step into the Arena
-> Connect your Robinhood wallet
-> Buy a box
-> Open your cards and build a deck
-> Pick a boss, fight, and earn $DARK
-> Level your cards and descend deeper
That is the how. Here is the why
This is a real game you actually play, with cards …
Dark Arena is officially live on the Robinhood chain 🪶
0xD1D4BBE54fDEafC83693420c5ADe4A2aBE6A90Da
The game is real. The players are already here. And now we are standing exactly where the attention and the liquidity are
This is not the finish line. This is the restart we earned, with a finished product behind it and everything still ahead
Every holder made it here with us. Now let's show the ETH community what we…
$DARK 🪙 (UPDATE)
$DARK team nailing it and nd chart climbing back to almost ATH
team is grinding nonstop and have done solid plays previously, i believe this is just starting as this one has the potential for multimillion
Their tech is pretty cool and i'll keep an eye here
https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/3LgNCFW7KjV34TePFih6wRtcWb7mSSByPLsRMxCPdArK
https://darkarena.app/
x.com/PlayDarkArena
@PlayDarkArena
$DARK 🪙 (UPDATE)
$DARK did a pretty smooth launch and holding strong above the presale price
Team have push the last one similarly so i am gonna be dcaing my position on dips
Their tech is pretty cool as well and the have planned some solid marketing in the upcoming days
130 players have already joined the game and purchased a card on Day 1
Your cards are going to turn into real profit, which is pretty bullish imo
…
$DARK has filled over 1400 SOL so far
TWO HOURS and the story will start to unfold
Presales were all the rage a few years ago and provided people with a generation of wealth and profit
Right now, we're at the beginning of this meta's comeback, and $DARK is LITERALLY the best option on the entire market
I definitely won't be sidelined this time, especially considering that this team is already SENDING its tokens t…
$DARK 🪙 (PRESALE)
Solid teir team behind this one and have done decent projects lately
It's the same team that did $CUPMARKETS which did crazy and almst 10X from our presale post
They are pretty good and knows how to push their projects
Their tech is live an dlooks pretty good to me, have a look on their website
They have raised around 1100 SOL so far and around 6H left for presale
I will buy a good bag here
RPG on …
Baby Mame 🔶 (UPDATE)
Baby Mame did a smooth launch and almost 4x for presale buyers
rn consolidating on a dip around 60k, they have 3% rewards in $MAME and their dev keeps doing buybacks
Team is grinding and pushing the chart and their community is pretty active too
Saw some good guys supporting as well, will keep my eyes here as this one can do good
DO JOIN THEIR TELEGRAM AND CHECK IT OUT
NFA!✅
https://gmgn.ai/bs…
BABYANSEM 🔶 (SUBSCRIPTION PRESALE)
They have raised around 7.5k bnb which is pretty crazy in this market
Their launch should cook imo, kudos if you aped subs and if you missed watch launch entry
I will keep an eye on launch as well as i believe this one can do good numbers
DO JOIN THEIR TELEGRAM AND CHECK IT OUT
NFA!✅
0x67eEAc92Cd21aF06DfeFa801e70df78A0dfa6666
https://gmgn.ai/bsc/token/0x67eeac92cd21af06dfefa801e…
BABYANSEM 🔶 (SUBSCRIPTION PRESALE)
This is the second subscription presale on Cheesepad, heard team have a decent previous named pony
They have a 40 BNB hardcap with a 0.2 BNB max
will gamble some here, let's see how it goes
DO JOIN THEIR TELEGRAM AND CHECK IT OUT
NFA!✅
0x67eEAc92Cd21aF06DfeFa801e70df78A0dfa6666
PRESALE :- https://www.cheesepad.ai/sale/bsc/0x07Cd8D8036F0b141438101558877b63744eeE6b9
🌐 Website
✈Te…
❤14💘4🔥2
Signed PΞYO
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ICC_ANNOUNCEMENT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,210,114 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🚀💎GEMHUNTER💎🚀 @Gemhunterrs · 618,145 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ICC ANNOUNCEMENT🇮🇳” (@ICC_ANNOUNCEMENT), 4,961 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ICC_ANNOUNCEMENT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.