4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,599–2,633 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 17:55
2,629
+7
9 Aug 2026, 22:31
2,622
+10
7 Aug 2026, 07:27
2,612
+9
6 Aug 2026, 08:17
2,603
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 2,629 subscribers
Avg views / post
881
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.812%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
22 (13 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
17,616
Reactions total
123
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
123 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
56
45.5%
👏
39
31.7%
❤
28
22.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Aviation English Grammar | IF vs. WHETHER
یکی از اشتباهات رایج در مکالمات انگلیسی هوانوردی، استفاده نادرست از IF و WHETHER است. هر دو ممکن است به فارسی «اگر» ترجمه شوند، اما کاربردشان کاملاً متفاوت است.
✅ IF = شرط (Condition)
از IF زمانی استفاده میکنیم که وقوع یک اتفاق به شرطی وابسته باشد.
Structure:
If + Present Simple, ... will + Verb
Examples:
🔹 If the visibility improves, we will resume departures.
(اگر دید بهت…
Word Challenge:
بدون نگاه کردن به متن، سعی کنید برای هر کدام از واژههای زیر یک جمله هوانوردی بسازید:
• undershot the runway
• veered sharply
• substantial damage
• debris
• gusting winds
• fractures
---
💬 Learn Aviation English from real accident reports... because that's the language real pilots, controllers and investigators use.
سوال دارین بپرسین : @roohimehdi
نکات پست قبلی :
# ✈️ Aviation Vocabulary
### ✅ undershot the runway
Meaning:
برخورد هواپیما با زمین قبل از رسیدن به آستانه باند
Example
> The aircraft undershot the runway during landing.
💡 Opposite:
Overshot the runway
(عبور از انتهای باند)
---
### ✅ impacted the ground
در گزارشهای رسمی هوانوردی معمولاً به جای hit the ground از impact the ground استفاده میشود.
Meaning
با زمین برخورد کرد.
---
### ✅ veer…
# ✈️ Aviation English from Real Accident Reports (1)
## Zest Air MA60 – Caticlan, Philippines
11 January 2009
یکی از بهترین روشهای یادگیری Aviation English، مطالعه گزارشهای واقعی سوانح هوایی است. در این گزارشها دقیقاً همان واژگانی را میبینید که در گزارشهای ICAO، تحقیقات سوانح (Accident Investigation) و حتی آزمون ICAO Language Proficiency استفاده میشوند.
---
## 📖 What happened?
A Zest Air MA60 was attempti…
📚 By vs. Until | یکی از رایجترین اشتباهات زبانآموزان و حتی خلبانان
اگر هنوز بین By و Until شک دارید، این قانون ساده را به خاطر بسپارید:
---
## 🟦 BY = حداکثر تا (Deadline)
By برای تعیین مهلت انجام یک کار استفاده میشود.
یعنی کار میتواند زودتر انجام شود، اما نباید از آن زمان دیرتر شود.
✈️ Aviation Examples
✅ Submit the flight plan by 1800 UTC.
> طرح پرواز را حداکثر تا ساعت ۱۸۰۰ UTC ارسال کنید.
✅ Complete th…
Which Picture Am I Describing?
In this picture, I can see the inside of an airport control tower. There are two air traffic controllers working together. One controller is looking through binoculars, while the other is monitoring the radar screens.
Outside the large windows, an airliner is on final approach with its landing gear down. It hasn't touched the runway yet. The weather appears to be clear with good visibil…
AVIATION ENGLISH | Incident Analysis
✈️ Temporary Runway Excursion at Shiraz Airport (SYZ)
A Raimon Airways Embraer ERJ-145 operating Flight RAI-7552 from Tehran Mehrabad (THR) to Shiraz (SYZ) experienced a temporary runway excursion during landing.
According to available information, the aircraft briefly departed the paved runway surface during the landing roll. The crew regained directional control, returned the ai…
📚 At the end یا In the end؟
یکی از رایجترین اشتباهات زبانآموزان همین دو عبارت شبیه به هم است. ✈️
✅ At the end یعنی در انتهای یک مکان، زمان یا فرآیند
📍 *The aircraft stopped at the end of the runway.*
✅ In the end یعنی در نهایت، سرانجام، عاقبت
🏆 *In the end, the flight departed safely.*
🎯 ترفند حفظ کردن:
* At the end ➜ جای پایان (Location/Time)
* In the end ➜ نتیجه نهایی (Result)
در این پست، هر دو عبارت را با م…
این دوشنبه میشه ۵/۵/۵
تو بیا شروع کن یاد بگیر منم هستم
تخفیفش هم با من
@ICAOLPR
👏9
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ICAOLPR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 277,343 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ICAO LPR LEVEL 4” (@ICAOLPR), 2,629 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ICAOLPR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.