hehe

Channel
Out of love.
@I0veseeker
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001243900753 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @I0veseeker |
| Description | Yogyakarta diciptakan Tuhan saat sedang bahagia, maka Bandung diciptakan Tuhan saat sedang jatuh cinta. 🗑 : @l0vehunterr ― (archive) : @l0vechaser ― (board) ☎️ : @kkadishabot : https://secreto.site/id/24061020 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/I0veseeker |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
guess who i am
see you moosha 👋🏻
maaf kalo gue belum bisa jadi moots yang baik
udah gue remove semua
akun gue ke deak tiba-tiba dan gue juga udah leaving
.
hey, sfs main acc in here! https://t.me/moanprr/4526 https://t.me/darbyisntsluts/441 https://t.me/cutyiebear/806 https://t.me/brgstajvn/818 https://t.me/squirmingg/3289 https://t.me/Wintery0ukim/28704 https://t.me/PARKJlNHE/7271 https://t.me/GlamourzBitch/7178 https://t.me/belledefille/5696 https://t.me/ddistaehyungT_T/499 https://t.me/swydney/3986 https://t.me/hiancur/10 https://t.me/netfliggs/6191 htt…
@donediving
i declared that moosha is a nickname for my moots and if you see this sign '🍿' on your board, that means i was already filled up your board.
anggep aja kayak secreto. keluarin semua uneg uneg lo tentang gue, tentang ch gue. gue tau lo males buka secreto jadi gue buat gituan. tapi kalo ada yang mau lo sampein dan itu panjang gak muat di board, lo bisa ke secreto gue aja.
📝 to keep supporting and spirit me, all of you can give me a critism and suggestion for me so that i can be better and better. don't forget to use polite language. 👤 be happy 👤 be happy 👤 𝐌𝐗𝐕⋆ You've been through a lot, don't give up, okay? spirit! 👤 stay healthy and semangat buat ngejalanin hari-harinya okk 👤 stay healty and be happy pretty 👤 be happy yaa 👤 be happy cantik 👤 be happy cuttie 😾😾 👤 be happy pr…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @I0veseeker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
wdyt abt Kádisha?
- looks calm and have a positive vibes, easy going person, attractive, i like ur personality!54%
- friendly and humble, talkactive, and a bit jametie i guess. let's get closer please33%
- adorable and kind girl, such a pretty girl, lovely person, u caught my attention9%
- cool vibes, kinda intimidating, swaggy. u scare me5%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2021 to 8 January 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,263,472 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 11
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 11
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@I0veseeker named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Out of love.” (@I0veseeker), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/I0veseeker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.