🔻وزارت دفاع ایالات متحده عملیات اطلاعاتی را اینگونه تعریف میکند: ▪️«بهکارگیری یکپارچۀ قابلیتهای مرتبط با اطلاعات در جریان عملیات نظامی، در هماهنگی با سایر خطوط عملیات، برای تأثیرگذاری، مختل کردن، فاسد کردن یا غصب تصمیمگیری دشمنان و دشمنان بالقوه و در عین حال محافظت از [تصمیمگیری] خود.» 🔹این عملیاتها شامل همۀ تلاشهایی است که دولتها یا هر گروه دیگری برای تأثیرگذاری بر رفتار مخاطب هدف، چه در زمان صلح و چه در …

Channel
𝐇𝐲𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐝 𝐖𝐚𝐫𝐟𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐞𝐬🇮🇷
@HybridWarSt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,688subscribers
-270 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001421712532 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HybridWarSt |
| Description | 🪖"امروزه جهان در بعد چهارم «جنگ» قرار دارد." همه برای یک پرچم🇮🇷 ✍️جایی برای تولید علم و آگاهی شناختی . . 🎙️برای تبادل علم و پاسخ به چیستی و چرایی آیدی ارتباطی : @mh13622 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HybridWarSt |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 22:46 | 6,688 | -6 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 01:10 | 6,694 | -8 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:10 | 6,702 | -17 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:57 | 6,719 | -16 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:00 | 6,735 | -11 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:09 | 6,746 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 6,754 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:09 | 6,760 | -8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 04:51 | 6,768 | -10 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 6,778 | -10 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 16:10 | 6,788 | -16 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 6,804 | -18 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 6,822 | -19 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 6,841 | -14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 6,855 | -9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 6,864 | -13 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 6,877 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:44 | 6,887 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 6,897 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 6,902 | first reading |
Engagement
227 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.95%
- avg views ÷ 6,688 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 465
- 113 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 114
- of 227 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 227 (4 August 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 52,510 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 14:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈10,200
- Videos
- ≈897
- Links
- ≈11,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 10m 20s
- Average length
- 1m 18s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 33 of 114 posts held from the last 30 days (28.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔻مدیریت تهدیدهای ترکیبی (Hybrid Threats)، به حوزهای رو به رشد و کلان در سطوح ملی و بینالمللی تبدیل شده است. ▪️این امر ایجاب میکند که دولتها، جوامع و سازمانهای بینالمللی فراتر از روندهای سنتی، ابعاد گوناگون این پدیده را بهدقت بشناسند، با ساختارسازی و ارتقای تابآوری سیستمیک، ضربهپذیریها را کاهش دهند و توانمندیهای راهبردی لازم را برای مهار و مقابله با اینگونه تهدیدها کسب کنند. 🔍کانال مطالعات جنگ هیبریدی ht…
🔻جنگ ترکیبی فرصتهای بسیاری برای استفاده از قابلیتهای سایبری بهعنوان یکی از طیف گستردۀ گزینههای غیرجنبشی یا غیرخشونتآمیز فراهم میکند. 🔹اگر هدف اصلی عملیات نفوذ سیاسی خارج از درگیری مسلحانه، بیثباتسازی و سردرگم کردن دشمنان باشد، آنگاه حمله به زیرساخت دیجیتال حریف برای تضعیف اعتماد از طریق به خطر انداختن، تغییر و مختل کردن خدمات دیجیتال دولت و بخش خصوصی با استفاده از بدافزار میتواند مؤثر باشد. 🔹اجتنابناپذیر …
🔻انتقال قدرت از تمرکز بر کنترلهای فیزیکی به نبردی تمامعیار برای هستۀ روانشناختی جمعیت جهانی تغییر یافته است. عملیاتهای نفوذ دیجیتالشده، هنجار جدید برای کنترل فرآیند انتخاباتی، افکار عمومی و روایت شدهاند. قدرت بازیگران این عرصه بسیار شدید است. #آموزش 🔍کانال مطالعات جنگ هیبریدی https://eitaa.com/HybridWarSt @HybridWarSt
🔻سلام. صبحتون بهخیر. روز خوبی داشته باشید.🌹 🔍کانال مطالعات جنگ هیبریدی https://eitaa.com/HybridWarSt @HybridWarSt
. ازدواج کردی؟!♥️ .
🔻هانا آرنت در کتاب خاستگاههای توتالیتاریسم، در تحلیل جنبشهای فاشیستی و کمونیستی دوران خود، به نکتهای مهم درباره رابطه جامعه و ظهور رهبران اقتدارگرا اشاره میکند: «مردم همواره فریادِ “مردِ قوی” و “رهبرِ بزرگ” سر میدهند؛ زیرا از جامعهای که احساس میکنند آنان را طرد کرده است، بیزارند.» ▪️از نگاه آرنت، این میل به ظهور «رهبر قدرتمند» را باید در تجربه طردشدگی، بیگانگی و گسست افراد از جامعه جستوجو کرد؛ جایی که احساس ب…
🔻ایدههای شما به نیروهایی وابسته شدهاند که هیچ کنترلی بر آنها ندارید، چون خودتان آزادانه' آزادی اندیشهتان را به سانسور هدایتگران ادراک و سرمایهدارانِ نظارتِ فراگیر تسلیم کردهاید. #آموزش 🔍کانال مطالعات جنگ هیبریدی https://eitaa.com/HybridWarSt @HybridWarSt
🔻جنگ اطلاعاتی و عملیات نفوذ در اصل برای رساندن پیام خود یا جلوگیری از رساندن پیام دشمن طراحی شدهاند. اما این فقط دربارۀ ساختن یک خط داستانی منسجم و متقاعدکننده نیست؛ بلکه شامل سردرگم کردن، منحرف کردن، تفرقه انداختن و تضعیف روحیۀ دشمن نیز میشود. 🔹از این دیدگاه، فضای سایبری برای انجام چنین عملیاتهایی که نتایج مختلکننده (نه ویرانگر) دارند، ایدهآل به نظر میرسد. ابزارهایی که از طریق آنها نفوذ اعمال میشود، عمدتاً …
🔻اول از همه، قدرتمندترين سلاحی که یک ملت یا گروه ذینفع میتواند در اختیار داشته باشد، “کنترل” بر اطلاعات است. این کنترل به تسلط بر روایت کمک میکند و میم، هسته روایت است. جنگ اطلاعاتی با میم آغاز میشود و با میم پایان مییابد. #آموزش 🔍کانال مطالعات جنگ هیبریدی https://eitaa.com/HybridWarSt @HybridWarSt
🔻دستکاری آگاهی هنری بسیار ظریف و پیچیده است و برای درک آن، باید بدانیم که فردِ دستکاریکننده در بیشتر مواقع چگونه عمل میکند. #آموزش 🔍کانال مطالعات جنگ هیبریدی https://eitaa.com/HybridWarSt @HybridWarSt
🔻روانشناسی اغلب بر این نکته تأکید میکند که میل یک فرد به کنترل دیگری را باید بازتابی از ضعفهای خودش دانست. 🔹فردِ دستکاریکننده با کنترل رفتار دیگران، در واقع تلاش میکند عقدهها، احساس ناتوانی، ناامنی یا حتی حسادت خود را جبران کند. 🔹با این حال، نکتهٔ جالب این است که بعضی افراد حتی متوجه نیستند که در حال دستکاری دیگراناند. هر کسی دستکم یکبار در زندگی خود، هرچند ناخودآگاه، چنین نقشی داشته است. ❇️بنابراین، لازم…
Showing the 12 most recent of 227 posts we hold for @HybridWarSt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@HybridWarSt edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 6 November 2026
- Most recent edit
- 6 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @HybridWarSt as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 9 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 9 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 21 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Kazbabae · 34,284
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
@sokhen_nab · 76,614
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
@mobahelegharne21 · 37,075
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
@MehdiDaneshmand · 23,545
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 September 2026
@jomlea · 29,567
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
@sooyemalakout · 26,437
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
@mohandesi_fekr · 33,167
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐇𝐲𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐝 𝐖𝐚𝐫𝐟𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐞𝐬🇮🇷” (@HybridWarSt), 6,688 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HybridWarSt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.