Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for STUBBORN

Channel

STUBBORN

@Hustlers_Thought

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

311subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001682893722
TypeChannel
Username@Hustlers_Thought
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Hustlers_Thought

Growth

311312311.57 August 2026 — 312 subscribers7 August 2026 — 312 subscribers15 August 2026 — 311 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 311–312 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:08311-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:17312no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:02312first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 311 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 February 202630 July 2026)
Views total157
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3660.0%
🔥813.3%
💯58.33%
🫡46.67%
👌35.00%
👍35.00%
❤‍🔥11.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 07:39 UTC50 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

How to Stop Worrying and Start Living 🌿 Most of us don't lose sleep because of what's happening. We lose sleep because of the stories our mind keeps writing at 2 AM. 💭 Trap into one Thought "What if I fail?" "What if they leave?" "What if I'm already too late?" The hardest part is... none of these things are actually happening. But your body reacts as if they already have. Here's what changed my perspective: Your m

2🔥1

28 May 2026, 10:59 UTC157 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The Dangerous Side of Success 🎭🏆 We spend most of our lives fearing failure. But sometimes, success is the moment that quietly unsettles us the most. ⚖️ Failure keeps us moving. 🔥 It gives us something to chase, something to prove, something to fight through. There’s clarity in struggle. A direction in discomfort. So we tell ourselves: “Once I achieve this, everything will change.” “Once I reach there, I’ll finall

🫡3

5 May 2026, 06:59 UTC164 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

One person may feel, “I’m showing up-doesn’t that prove I care?” Another may feel, “I need to hear and feel it consistently to feel secure.” Underneath both is the same need: to feel seen, valued, and safe.🕊️ Depth comes from translating, not judging. From asking, “What makes the other person feel cared for?” and then choosing to meet them there—intentionally. When awareness replaces assumption, reassurance stops

3

5 May 2026, 05:41 UTC136 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Different Signals, Same Need: Feeling Valued🧠❤️ In relationships, many conflicts don’t come from lack of care- they come from differences in how care is perceived and expressed. Some people are more responsive to visual and external cues.👀 Presence, appearance, gestures, and shared experiences quickly create attraction and engagement. These signals feel immediate and tangible Others are more responsive to emotiona

3

30 Apr 2026, 05:41 UTC125 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The Real Risk Isn’t Failure👀 Before taking any risk, the mind often whispers- “What if we fail?” “What will people think?” “What if it doesn’t work out?”💭 And just like that, safety feels easier than possibility. But what if the fear is simplified? Not emotionally… but logically. 🧠 If we fail, will everything truly collapse? Will life become unlivable? Or will it simply bruise the ego for a while? In most cases, f

🔥3

25 Apr 2026, 07:30 UTC107 viewsread 7 August 2026

React with post, that's shows you want more... Share your perspective in comments

25 Apr 2026, 05:41 UTC111 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The Quiet Cost of “What If”💭 Have we ever paused and wondered, “What if we’re capable of more, but simply not trying enough?”🤔 It’s a thought rarely spoken aloud— because chasing something meaningful isn’t easy. It’s inconsistent, lonely, and filled with doubt.🌙 Some days, even the purpose feels unclear. But what’s truly heavier? A life that looks comfortable from the outside, yet feels empty within Comfort doesn’

2👍1

24 Apr 2026, 05:41 UTC95 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The Weight of Missed Chances⚖️ At times, we regret speaking impulsively; at others, we regret remaining silent.🤐 Yet the deepest regret does not come from what we said or didn’t say—it comes from the opportunities we never even tried to pursue.💭 Life constantly presents moments that quietly ask for action—an idea, a risk, a step forward.🚪✨ But hesitation, fear, and overthinking often hold us back. We choose comfort

👍1

18 Apr 2026, 16:47 UTC109 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The most useful thing failure taught me is this: Most people don’t fail because they lack talent, they fail because they stop. 🥀 One bad day. One bad pitch. One bad review. One bad month. And suddenly, they think the story is over. Like that moment is the final proof. But it isn’t. It almost never is. ⚡ The truth is, failure only becomes permanent when you decide to stop showing up. The people I respect the mos

4👍1🔥1

17 Apr 2026, 05:41 UTC101 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Confidence isn’t something you suddenly feel one day, it’s something you earn in silence. 🌑 In the moments no one sees, when everything in you wants to quit, when comfort feels safer than growth, and still… you choose to stay. 🖤 Not because it’s easy, but because somewhere deep inside, you know running away will cost you more than staying. Every hard thing you do intentionally leaves a mark within you, a quiet rem

2💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Hustlers_Thought. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 405,887 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“STUBBORN” (@Hustlers_Thought), 311 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hustlers_Thought.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.