Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

How to Go wrong

@HowToGoWrong

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,685subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001480119860
TypeChannel
Username@HowToGoWrong
Created19 October 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/HowToGoWrong

Growth

1,6856 Aug 2026, 15:32 — 1,685 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:00 — 1,685 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 15:327 Aug 2026, 10:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,683–1,687 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 10:001,685no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:321,685first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.0%
avg views ÷ 1,685 subscribers
Avg views / post
741
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (24 January 202631 July 2026)
Views total741
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
12
Videos
1
Links
233

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

228 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10947.8%
🤣6930.3%
👏229.65%
🤔219.21%
😢62.63%
👎10.439%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HowToGoWrong. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 January 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC741 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Скоро и STL подвезут https://github.com/golang/go/issues/80590

🤣10👏6👍3🤔1😢1

18 Jun 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,600 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Несколько раз натыкался на эту шершавость, но наконец-то написал тикет: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/80056

👏7

15 Jun 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,710 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я нанимаю к себе в команду в Workato писать новые проекты на Go на замену старых на Ruby: https://t.me/gogetajob/145155 Задать вопросы можно в том чате, в комментариях тут, но, если можно, не в личке.

👍14👏4

26 May 2026, 09:32 UTC≈2,360 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наконец-то кто-то это сделал, а go test -fuzz совсем заброшен командой Go: https://blog.trailofbits.com/2026/05/12/go-fuzzing-was-missing-half-the-toolkit.-we-forked-the-toolchain-to-fix-it./

👍10

Signed Alexey Palazhchenko

23 May 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,910 views10 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

В продолжение темы выноса всякого полезного кода из FerretDB: https://github.com/AlekSi/xfail Очень простоя библиотека для ожидаемо падающих тестов проверяющая, что они всё ещё падают. Как обычно, ставьте звёзды 😁️️

👍9🤣1

Signed Alexey Palazhchenko

25 Apr 2026, 11:27 UTC≈2,540 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не прошло и 11-и лет (а только 10,5): https://github.com/golang/go/issues/12854#issuecomment-4256916067 Осталось 9 месяцев до релиза дотерпеть. Вообще, интересный тренд, когда добираются до всё более и более старых proposal’ов.

👍18🤔2

Signed Alexey Palazhchenko

9 Apr 2026, 15:48 UTC≈2,840 views7 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

Весь свой выходной день делаю одну штуку, связанную со сравнением значений разными способами (почти как 4 года назад), перечитываю спеку языка раз за разом. И вдруг заметил такое бревно в глазу языке, что теперь не могу развидеть. В спеке есть понятия comparable и strictly comparable: «The equality operators == and != apply to operands of comparable types. The ordering operators <, <=, >, and >= apply to operands of

👏5👍1🤔1

Signed Alexey Palazhchenko

7 Mar 2026, 12:57 UTC≈2,510 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В 1.26.1 откатили это, но отладка кода с race detector’ом осталось сломанной. Ждём 1.26.2: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/77597

🤣9👍2

Signed Alexey Palazhchenko

7 Mar 2026, 12:52 UTC≈2,230 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Поддержку генерации UUID уже скоро завезут в стандартную библиотеку. В полном соответствии с законом тривиальности Паркинсона (a.k.a. bike-shedding), сейчас там полыхает драма. 😁

🤣6👍1

Signed Alexey Palazhchenko

5 Mar 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,870 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не прошло и… всего восьми лет, как proposal про const решили отклонить: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/27975#issuecomment-4000712203 Мир изменился, мы изменились, уже даже автор не считает предложение таким уж нужным – и только команда Go верна себе. 😁

👍5😢3

Signed Alexey Palazhchenko

28 Feb 2026, 10:36 UTC≈2,320 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Оказывается, 11 дней полыхала драма, и одно крошечное, но могучее изменение откатят в 1.26.1: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/77653

👍6🤔4🤣2👎1😢1

Signed Alexey Palazhchenko

27 Feb 2026, 19:57 UTC≈2,020 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Новые вопросы на собеседованиях через 3… 2… https://go.dev/blog/allocation-optimizations

🤣18👍4😢1

Signed Alexey Palazhchenko

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HowToGoWrong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,114,864 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“How to Go wrong” (@HowToGoWrong), 1,685 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HowToGoWrong.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.