Channel
@HouseOfDiaz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002234330407 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HouseOfDiaz |
| Description | ㅤㅤ ERROR—CODE. @HouseOfDiaz AGENT INITIAL DESIGNATION! And right on target. "The alien showed." Like blazes, he instanter reported to: @DiazArchives @.TheDiazBot & @.DeDiazBot (For sfs only). | Stay alert at all times. ✶ ㅤㅤ |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HouseOfDiaz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 8 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 8 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 18 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
73 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 25 | 34.2% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 26.0% | |
| 💘 | 14 | 19.2% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 6.85% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2025 to 2 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Selamat pagi, Daze, setelah beberapa konflik yang sedang terjadi di sini. Kami baru saja mendapatkan informasi Bahwa salah salah satu MANTAN ANGGOTA KELUARGA kami bernama, Idrissa/Hariz/Soobino. Terkait permasalahan yang telat ia perbuat selama ini sudah kami hampiri langsung pihak yang terkait, serta meminta Idrissa/Hariz/Soobino untuk menyelesaikan serta berbicara yang sebenarnya. Kami juga sudah berbincang terkait…
Hi, good morning! Through this message we would like to inform you that for the time being @HouseOfDiaz Will temporary stop all activities in this channel. Due to certain reasons and considerations, we have also decided to MOVE TO NEW CHANNEL where our future activities will continue. To all our mutuals and partners of Diaz, you are kindly advised to Unsubscribe or Leave this channel. Please don’t worry — we will st…
🔥16💘12❤11
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Senyum dikit aja sy ganteng banget
❤1
Daze, izinkan saya bicara dari lubuk hati yang paling dalam, meskipun kata-kata ini mungkin tidak cukup untuk menebus semua kesalahan saya. Sejujurnya, saya bahkan tidak tahu harus mulai dari mana, karena ada begitu banyak hal yang ingin saya sampaikan, ada begitu banyak perasaan yang terpendam lama di dada saya, dan ada begitu banyak penyesalan yang sudah menumpuk sampai saya sendiri nyaris tidak bisa membedakannya …
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤ PASTORAL ㅤ:ㅤ 1.99 ㅤㅤㅤ ( Abaft O’ Secluded Castle ) INK 1773’s. “PRIOR TO SPHERE OF RECOLLECTION : THE DUISTERG CLAN .. 🩸” A frightening radiance marks the journey, born from the anguish of a missing presence. Yet, within this self-reflective maze, weaving understanding through the shadows. People born in 1985 - 1997 are currently being invited to become our parents…
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤHERE, THE LETTER ✿ CALLING EVERY INDIVIDUAL TO FILL THE EMPTINESS OF THE GLASSES THAT HAVE BEEN SET. This season is a wonderful time to welcome new visionaries, as spring makes its presence known, spreading warmth and life to every soul. Just as we offer refreshing drinks to quench thirst and soothe the spirit, now, we seek those who will become part of our island: ❀ Tropic Sun (1980-1993) …
Sticker, posted without a caption
Hai Daze, I miss you so much btw.
🏆3🆒3❤2💘2🔥2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @HouseOfDiaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 720,712 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@HouseOfDiaz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DIAZ #MOVED CHANNEL.” (@HouseOfDiaz), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HouseOfDiaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.