Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 何叔叔發達大計

Channel

何叔叔發達大計

@Houncle_tips

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,219subscribers

+86 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002235625637
TypeChannel
Username@Houncle_tips
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Houncle_tips

Growth

11,13311,22711,1807 August 2026 — 11,133 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,133 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,139 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,138 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,155 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,165 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,170 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,182 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,197 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,199 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,195 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,198 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,205 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,215 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,212 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,206 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,208 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,221 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,214 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,219 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,227 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,219 subscribers11,2197 August 202630 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 23 days, net +86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,119–11,241 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 06:5411,219-8
29 Aug 2026, 08:2511,227+8
28 Aug 2026, 06:3811,219+5
27 Aug 2026, 03:2611,214-7
26 Aug 2026, 04:2911,221+13
25 Aug 2026, 01:1311,208+2
23 Aug 2026, 17:1711,206-6
22 Aug 2026, 00:0511,212-3
20 Aug 2026, 14:5311,215+10
19 Aug 2026, 16:2511,205+7
18 Aug 2026, 18:3311,198+3
17 Aug 2026, 18:3711,195-4
16 Aug 2026, 16:4211,199+2
14 Aug 2026, 23:0611,197+15
13 Aug 2026, 15:3711,182+12
12 Aug 2026, 13:4411,170+5
11 Aug 2026, 12:5311,165+10
10 Aug 2026, 10:4511,155+17
9 Aug 2026, 12:4111,138-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:3311,139first reading

Engagement

222 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.33%
avg views ÷ 11,219 subscribers
Avg views / post
934
222 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.571%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
222
of 222 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 167 of 222 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held222 (4 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total207,432
Reactions total901
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

901 reactions across 162 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥45049.9%
16618.4%
👍13615.1%
💩717.88%
🤮465.11%
👎161.78%
💊60.666%
👏50.555%
🤷‍♂50.555%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 167 of the 222 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 901reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC685 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

R3 1/2/4/9 2wp 9p 整反場先🔥🤞🤟🏻

🤮1

29 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC686 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

6場收4場!合格! 有冇人跑馬

🔥4💩1

28 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC834 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

週末限定大陸料 主0 主受讓盤 小 客0 主0 9:00另一場墨超客讓半球 Total 6場 好似6場馬會都有🔥🤞👨🏼‍🦳

3🤮2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 222 posts we hold for @Houncle_tips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“何叔叔發達大計” (@Houncle_tips), 11,219 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Houncle_tips.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.