نقد و بررسی فیلم میکی ۱۷
👍6👏2😁2

Channel
@HosseinZ29
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,270subscribers
-64 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001920002890 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HosseinZ29 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HosseinZ29 |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 2,270 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 2,274 | -5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 2,279 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:35 | 2,288 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 2,292 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 2,295 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 2,299 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 2,303 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 2,313 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 2,318 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 2,325 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 2,334 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 2,334 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
343 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 232 | 67.6% | |
| ❤ | 43 | 12.5% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 7.87% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 5.25% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 3.79% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.46% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.875% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.583% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 343 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2024 to 11 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نقد و بررسی فیلم میکی ۱۷
👍6👏2😁2
نقد و بررسی فیلم همدم / Companion
🔥2🤔1
چرا برخورد هالیوود با کاراکترهای ترنس انقدر احمقانه است؟ @HosseinZ29 🥰
👏11😁4🤔3
بعد از دیدن فیلم Babygirl سوال اساسی من اینه که فمنیست ها کجان دقیقا؟ چرا اعتراض نمی کنن؟ چرا باید کاراکتر زن فیلم که از بهترین دانشگاه با بهترین نمره ها فارغ التحصیل شده و بسیار باهوش هست رو انقدر خوار و خفیف و بدبخت و ضعیف نشون بدن؟ این فیلم جز توهین به زن ها هیچ دستاورد دیگه ای نداره ولی چون کارگردان فیلم زن هست کسی جرات نقد منفی نداره! @HosseinZ29 🥰
👍33
بالاخره و بعد از ۶ سال فهمیدم که معنی پایان بندی فیلم The Wailing چیه! با فاصله جز ۵ فیلم ترسناک برتر قرن هست. اگر ندیدید واقعا نصف عمرتون به فناست. از اون فیلما هم نیست که یکی بپره جلو دوربین و بخواد شما رو سکته بده. از اون جنسه که ترسش رخنه می کنه تو وجودت و تا سال ها باهات میمونه. فضاسازی بی نظیر و داستان خلاقانه و پیچیده ش کاری می کنه که نتونی خیر و شر رو تشخیص بدی. خلاصه که پرفکته. ۱۰ از ۱۰. @HosseinZ29
👍17❤1
سلام بچه ها امیدوارم که حالتون خوب باشه اگه دوس دارید عضو گروه کلوزفرند من بشید (رایگان هست) جایی که به طور اختصاصی می تونید با من در ارتباط باشید فقط کافیه این ویدیو رو ببینید و کاری که گفتم رو انجام بدید. پ.ن: اگر قبلا عضو بودی دوباره باید عضو بشی چون دارم عضوگیری رو از اول انجام میدم
👍8
ایران به آمریکا حمله هسته ای کرده؟ دلیل ساخته شدن سیلوها ایرانی ها هستن؟ چرا الگوریتم سیمز رو رد کرد؟ آیا جولیت و برنارد زنده هستن؟ سکانس پایانی سریال چه معنایی داره؟ رمزگشایی و موشکافی کامل از پایان بندی فصل دوم سریال سیلو 🔥 @HosseinZ29
❤5
تعداد جنسیت: از پیدایش خلقت تا ۲۰۲۰: ۲ تا از ۲۰۲۰ تا ۲۰۲۴: ۶۹ هزارتا از ۲۰۲۴ به بعد: ۲ تا دغدغه ی غربی جماعت رو ببین تو رو خدا 😅 @HosseinZ29 🥰
👍29😁9❤3🔥2
ترامپ اعلام کرد که تو دولتش فقط دو جنسیت مرد و زن به رسمیت شناخته میشن. پیش بینی من: هالیوود در چهار سال آینده ده هزار تا فیلم و سریال (البته بگم پروپاگاندا بهتره) خواهد ساخت که کاراکترهای اصلیش نان باینری، ترنس و قس علی هذا خواهند بود و برای این که حرص مردم رو دربیارن کلی هم جایزه بهشون میدن. این پست باشه اینجا تا بعدا به حرفم ایمان بیارید 😎 @HosseinZ29 🥰
👍42🔥1🤔1😁1
چی میشه اگه به بازیگرای سریالت ۱۵۰ میلیارد حقوق بدی؟ نقد و بررسی قسمت اول سریال ایرانی ازازیل رو می تونید تو یوتیوبم ببینید @HosseinZ29 🥰
👍3
نبوغ فصل دوم سیلو این بود که کاری کرد تا تشخیص دوست و دشمن سخت بشه. و این موضوع رو تا جایی جلو برد که خیلی جدی از خودمون بپرسیم واقعا دشمن کیه؟! نقد و بررسی فصل دوم سیلو رو از طریق لینک زیر ببینید @HosseinZ29 🥰
👍10
سریال های ایرانی شبکه خانگی رو می بینید؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HosseinZ29. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
سریال های ایرانی شبکه خانگی رو می بینید؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کدوم یکی از این فیلمها رو دیدید؟ (چند گزینه هم می تونید انتخاب کنید)
The shares total 312%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2024 to 11 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hossein Zarbatie” (@HosseinZ29), 2,270 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HosseinZ29.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.