Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🔥🔥Hopium Slayer & Frens🔥🔥

@HopiumSlayer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,231subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001285755139
TypeChannel
Username@HopiumSlayer
Created20 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/HopiumSlayer

Growth

7,2317,2487,239.56 August 2026 — 7,248 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,240 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,231 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,228–7,251 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:467,231-9
7 Aug 2026, 17:187,240-8
6 Aug 2026, 21:317,248first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 7,231 subscribers
Avg views / post
791
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held28 (31 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total22,147
Reactions total379
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
27,200
Videos
4,440
Links
4,710

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

379 reactions across 25 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯10327.2%
🤣5113.5%
4211.1%
🤮4110.8%
🔥369.50%
😁359.23%
👍266.86%
😈133.43%
🤬102.64%
🏆61.58%
🤡51.32%
👏30.792%
🤷‍♂30.792%
20.528%
💩10.264%
😭10.264%
🤔10.264%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 379reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC391 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/laMCKoncZr8?is=0atf7R3ISuvUkDLi

🔥3

Signed 🔥Sir Escanor🔥

10 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC465 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The Cope is Real 😂🔪 Thread wrecking this twat: https://x.com/escanorreloaded/status/2085322772025102380?s=46&t=q1VkTAAtVnPbHV6ko2BmPA

👍1🤡1

Signed 🔥Sir Escanor🔥

9 Aug 2026, 23:21 UTC631 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁9💯4

Signed 🔥Sir Escanor🔥

9 Aug 2026, 22:54 UTC893 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Feeling like an idiot today? Don’t worry. There’s an entire herd of adults that stapled bandages to their ears in solidarity with an orange clown. You’re fine. You’re great, actually.

🤣18😁8🤡41

Signed 🔥Sir Escanor🔥

9 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC621 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

All Greeks are waiting for the Day of Rage patiently. I’ll be here.

🔥10🤔1

Signed 🔥Sir Escanor🔥

9 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC550 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

You’ll own nothing and be happy https://youtube.com/shorts/ve3Z7NJ_Amo?is=WZUfUQjRLWmtVh89

💯6

Signed 🔥Sir Escanor🔥

9 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC545 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Sneaky Sneako Stealing a kiss? 😘

🤮10

Signed 🔥Sir Escanor🔥

8 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC716 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

This shit has been going on for a long time.

🤮23🤬21🤷‍♂1😈1

Signed GuyFrees

8 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC582 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://x.com/escanorreloaded/status/2086038823054512238?s=46&t=q1VkTAAtVnPbHV6ko2BmPA

Signed 🔥Sir Escanor🔥

7 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC700 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Driving in Greece, especially the islands, is 50 percent talent and 50 percent praying nobody’s coming around the same blind curve you are. An hour and ten minutes to cover 35 kilometers. Twisting, turning, blind corners the whole way, rustic scenery colliding with something genuinely stunning. Always dangerous. First gear, second gear, never third. Third gear and you’re not making it up that hill. Visiting family

33😁3

Signed 🔥Sir Escanor🔥

6 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC717 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://x.com/escanorreloaded/status/2085322772025102380?s=46&t=q1VkTAAtVnPbHV6ko2BmPA

🔥3

Signed 🔥Sir Escanor🔥

5 Aug 2026, 03:35 UTC984 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁12💯41

Signed GuyFrees

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @HopiumSlayer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 637,724 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔥🔥Hopium Slayer & Frens🔥🔥” (@HopiumSlayer), 7,231 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HopiumSlayer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.