Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,177–8,323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 10:37
8,194
-26
14 Sept 2026, 13:17
8,220
-28
10 Sept 2026, 20:18
8,248
-45
5 Sept 2026, 14:01
8,293
+40
2 Sept 2026, 00:48
8,253
-15
30 Aug 2026, 09:17
8,268
-21
27 Aug 2026, 05:23
8,289
-11
24 Aug 2026, 02:45
8,300
+4
20 Aug 2026, 02:26
8,296
-4
17 Aug 2026, 10:35
8,300
-6
14 Aug 2026, 00:13
8,306
+49
10 Aug 2026, 22:32
8,257
-32
8 Aug 2026, 06:05
8,289
-3
7 Aug 2026, 14:01
8,292
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:58
8,292
first reading
Engagement
216 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 216 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 28m
Average length
3m 06s
Measured directly from 48 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,733 reactions across 208 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,378
17.8%
😁
1,236
16.0%
👍
1,123
14.5%
🔥
1,067
13.8%
😭
855
11.1%
💅
635
8.21%
💔
609
7.88%
😍
326
4.22%
❤🔥
295
3.81%
😱
109
1.41%
👀
67
0.866%
🤯
33
0.427%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 208 of the 216 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,733 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 216 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔮#Leaks
لیکر میگه این لیک باف هایی که تا الان از اکرون ، دان هنگ IL و جینگ یوان برای آیتمشون لیک شده فقط بخش کوچیکی از باف و تغییر انیمیشن و کیت اصلیشونه.
همینطور لیکر میگه ما فقط میدونیم که این آیتم ها رایگان نیستند و باید توسط چیزی خریداری و گرفته بشن ، حالا ممکنه وارپ باشه ، ممکنه شارد باشه یا اصلا ممکنه براش یه بخش خریداری جدید اضافه بشه مثل شاپ کاراکتر ، برای همین بش پولی میگیم ولی هنوز مشخص نیست چطور گرفته …
🌐#News
بازی WWW برنده بهترین بازی موبایل 2026 Gamescom شد ( عملا معتبر ترین ایونت گیمینگ دنیا )
متاسفانه گنشین و زنلس ( از گیمای هویو ) به نامزدی رسیدن و برنده نشدن.
🪞 Channel : @HonkaiSR_IR
🥀 Our Team : @PersianGacha
🔮#Leaks 「4.6」
یه خط جالب با منشا نامعلوم تو تکستمپ فایل های بازی پیدا شده
همزمان Path فعلی این کاراکتر رو توی تیم فعلی عوض میکنه
Source :Sakiko
🪞 Channel : @HonkaiSR_IR
🥀 Our Team : @PersianGacha
🔮#Leaks 「4.6」
بچه ها اگه جایی لیک هایی میبینید که قیمت هر باف حدود 90 دلاره کاملا فیکه و میس اینفو عه.
تا این لحظه هیچ اطلاعیه رسمی از سمت هویوورس مبنی بر نحوه گرفتن باف یا حتی قیمتش نیومده.
Source : HXG
🪞 Channel : @HonkaiSR_IR
🥀 Our Team : @PersianGacha
🔮#Leaks 「4.6」
گیمپلی تمیزی از تیم پرل + اونشیا + مادام یائو + الیشن ام سی , 4 کاست مقابل باس لایگس ، زیرو سایکل
Link
🪞 Channel : @HonkaiSR_IR
🥀 Our Team : @PersianGacha
🔮#Leaks 「4.6」
در مورد فاینالیتی
چیزی که همه که فکر کردید ترکیب الیشن و بریکه که اینطوری نیست. به نظر میاد بخش Break فقط مخصوص TB باشه یا احتمالاً از اینجا مونده باشه که Harmony TB بهعنوان پایه استفاده شده.
چیزی که به نظر میاد در اصل وجود داره، 3 بخش اصلیه:
1- مین دی پی اس بودن یا داشتن فانتوم (اسم موقته): Phantom نمیتونه مورد حمله قرار بگیره و نمیشه هیلش کرد، ولی برست مود هایی که ظاهراً بر اساس SPD کار میکنن، …
🔮#Leaks 「4.6」
مقایسه پرل با اونتورین توی تیم فالواپ اشبلید و تیم مونو الیشن توی نایت انومالی باس کوکولیا
Link
🪞 Channel : @HonkaiSR_IR
🥀 Our Team : @PersianGacha
🔮#Leaks 「4.6」
مقایسه پرل و هوهو توی تیم اونتورین + اشبلید توی نایت انومالی
Aventurine waveflair + AshBlade + HouHou : 1 Cycle 69 AV
Aventurine waveflair + AshBlade + Pearl : 2 Cycle 47 AV
با هوهو تیم اونتورین اشبلید 137 AV سریعتر انومالی رو کلیر کرد
Link
🪞 Channel : @HonkaiSR_IR
🥀 Our Team : @PersianGacha
🎉#fun
حجم لیک داده ها تو 4.6 انقد زیاد بوده که خود لیکرا هم هنگ کردن😂
جدا چه خبره؟😂
🪞 Channel : @HonkaiSR_IR
🥀 Our Team : @PersianGacha
❤14👍3
Signed 𝑹𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝑻𝒂𝒌𝒖𝒎𝒊
Showing the 12 most recent of 216 posts we hold for @HonkaiSR_IR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
خب از اونجایی که فکرشو نمیکردم هازبند ها بیشتر ری اکت بخورن بریم یه بار برای همیشه این نتیجه رو مشخص کنیم😂
هازبندو پلیرم و جونمو فدای هازبند هام میکنم.47%
وایفو پلیرم و جونمو فدای وایف هام میکنم27%
متا اسلیوم و مجبورم چیزی بگیرم که خوشم نیاد18%
هر چی میاد میگیرم مهم نیست40%
The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
خب برای فردا شب کاراکتر مرد رو اونچورین میزارم چون بعدی ساندی بیشترین رای رو آورد.
ولی... کاراکتر زن به نظرت کدوم باشه؟
اسپارکل28%
بلک سوآن42%
روآن می28%
هیمکو34%
The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 216 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
AW News @AWnews · 22,168 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HonkaiStarRail.IR” (@HonkaiSR_IR), 8,194 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HonkaiSR_IR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.