😁 Ko rõ yêu nhau kiểu gì mà anh thanh niên kia đánh vào mặt chị này ko thương tiếc - liệu có bị xử lý HS

Channel
Hóng Biến News 🇻🇳
@HongBienScandal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13,858subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002158521638 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HongBienScandal |
| Description | 📮Kênh Hóng Biến Hàng Đầu VN Liên Hệ Đăng Bài Quảng Cáo Trên Hệ Thống Kênh @ThuKyAdsBot 👉 Full Drama Ghé @TichTacBot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HongBienScandal |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 13,858 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 13,856 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 13,854 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 13,851 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 13,857 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 13,852 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 13,849 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 13,847 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 13,852 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 13,856 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 13,867 | -9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 13,876 | +9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 13,867 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 13,870 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 13,878 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 13,891 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 13,894 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 13,906 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 13,909 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 13,908 | first reading |
Engagement
68 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.96%
- avg views ÷ 13,858 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 548
- 68 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.148%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 68
- of 68 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 68 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 68 (4 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 37,279 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,930
- Videos
- ≈7,620
- Links
- ≈825
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 37m
- Average length
- 1m 26s
Measured directly from 68 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 73.7% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
😁 Thuận An - Bình Dương (cũ): Nghe bảo người bị đánh là chủ cũ, cũng là người dẫn thanh niên kia vào nghề gốm. Thanh niên sau khi học nghề xong thì mở tiệm ngay đối diện
😁 Nhóm đối tượng gây gối trật tự công cộng tại đc 66 Hai Bà Trưng Q1 tphcm - đề nghị cơ quan chức năng điều tra làm rõ
😁 Dạ hiện tại là em đang bị hâm dọa đâm chém tạt mắm tôm dành khách bình luận tiêu cực nick TikTok - em nhờ mọi người làm chứng giúp em nha..
😁 Trước đó chắc var chạm gì đó nhưng anh xe máy tính lấy thân mình lấp lỗ châu mai à - phun nước miếng tùm lum luôn
😁 Anh chủ nhà trọ đã bay 9 triệu tiền nước,khách thuê trọ xả nước liên tục trong 1 tháng vì tư thù cá nhân.
❤1
😁 Số dư tài khoản của bạn vừa được +200.000.000vnd và 1 chuyến nghỉ dưỡng ở bệnh viện tốt nhất.
😁 Đi bão vui quá nhưng nếu mấy thằng này bị khởi tố luôn thì mình sẻ rất là vui cho những thể loại lơi dụng phá làng phá xóm
❤1
😁 Nhìn đám thanh thiếu niên cùng hung khí manh động… tiến thẳng và póp cò… chắc các cháu nghĩ đang đóng phim… vụ việc được cho là khu vực Tây Hải Phòng
🤣2❤1
😁 QL1A Tân Lập, Lâm Đồng - thề với anh em thì kiểu này thật sự ko ai đỡ nổi khi ngt đã cố tình đâm vào thì né kiểu gì
❤1
😁 Trong thi đấu MMA - việc chênh lệch hạng cân vài kg củng đã đủ khiến trận đấu ngã sang hướng khác nhưng đây thì ......
😁 Kiểu này chủ phá sản sớm nhờ bọn làm thuê. Giờ thiếu gì chành mở cạnh tranh hơn thua nhau đôi khi kg phải cái giá...mà là cách cư xử - củng chưa rõ trước đó xảy ra việc gì
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @HongBienScandal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,472,120 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hóng Biến News 🇻🇳” (@HongBienScandal), 13,858 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HongBienScandal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.