Channel
@HoldcoinCventure
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21,419subscribers
+8,876 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002144819991 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HoldcoinCventure |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HoldcoinCventure |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:07 | 21,419 | -43 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:56 | 21,462 | -64 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:09 | 21,526 | -53 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:59 | 21,579 | -199 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:37 | 21,778 | -40 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:40 | 21,818 | -64 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:50 | 21,882 | -59 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:46 | 21,941 | -57 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 21,998 | -94 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 22,092 | -1,474 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:10 | 23,566 | -86 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:39 | 23,652 | -44 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 23,696 | -51 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:45 | 23,747 | -2,258 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 26,005 | +3,551 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:04 | 22,454 | +6,337 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 18:10 | 16,117 | -83 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:36 | 16,200 | -82 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 15:31 | 16,282 | -149 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:08 | 16,431 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (17 July 2026 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 9,280 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Oct 2026, 22:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Bitcoin and Nasdaq show a correlation in volatility, but their structure is not uniform. During the period of October 2025–October 2026, Bitcoin experienced a sharp correction from above $120,000 to below $60,000, before recovering to around $80,000–$86,000. Meanwhile, the Nasdaq Composite maintained a significantly higher score than at the beginning of the period. This difference shows that although both are influ…
On-chain analysis week 41/2026: Bitcoin's mature structure Bitcoin is operating within a market structure where selling pressure from groups of investors who bought at high prices continues to limit its breakout potential, while on-chain indicators suggest that the underlying support level remains intact. Market Summary Bitcoin remains trapped between major resistance and support zones, with cost bases near $88,00…
Bitunix CFDs - Bridging Digital Assets and Traditional Financial Markets Bitunix is expanding beyond crypto into traditional financial markets, enabling users to trade forex, gold, precious metals, commodities, stock indices, and ETFs through its proprietary CFD module. CFDs provide price exposure without ownership of the underlying assets, allowing users to open Long or Short positions with leverage and no fixed e…
On-chain Status: From Stablecoins to the Entire DEFI and RWA Ecosystem On-chain yield is not a new source of profit separate from the traditional financial system; it is the process of tokenizing, programming, and restructuring existing economic income sources on the blockchain. On-chain yield is shifting toward sustainable cash flows, driven by lending interest, protocol fees, staking, tokenized Treasuries, and re…
A Study on Security Measures for Centralized Exchanges (CEXs) In the days following the Bitget attack, I've often asked myself what CEXs are really aiming for, given their stable revenue stream. They want to build new features and trends to attract more customers, but behind their operational systems are numerous unresolved issues. I read a World War II essay by statistical mathematician Abraham Wald on the survivo…
Exchange Reserves Continue to Decline, Supply Structure Shifting The amount of ETH held on exchanges has decreased sharply over the years and is now only around 14.6M ETH, significantly lower than the approximately 21.3M ETH seen in July 2025. Notably, the supply on exchanges is decreasing while the amount of ETH staking continues to expand. Approximately 43.6M ETH is currently in the active validator balance, whil…
Ethereum is recovering but hasn't yet entered the high-risk growth zone? Data from the AVIV Risk Oscillator shows Ethereum currently fluctuating around 1.0-1.1, above the Deep Value Zone but not yet reaching the high-risk zone. This indicates that ETH has emerged from a deep discount period since the beginning of 2026, but significant profits haven't been realized yet, and distribution risk is beginning to increase…
On-chain analysis week 38/2026: Ethereum is revaluing itself ahead of volatility Ethereum is entering a new phase of revaluation, and the story is no longer simply about "ETH deflation," as capital is shifting from retail investors to large traditional money flows. Key Takeaways • Ethereum is entering a revaluation phase, supported by improving institutional capital flows, a stronger supply structure, and continu…
Bitcoin and Crypto are Shifting from “Experimental Technology” to Financial Infrastructure Looking back at its history from 2008 to the present, the crypto market has gone through many cycles and is more mature than ever, progressing from cypherpunk to ICOs, DeFi, NFTs, stablecoins, and finally institutional adoption. Each cycle not only creates a new narrative but also expands the scope of blockchain application. …
Crypto MarketCap 2026 Report - Institutional Adoption, Market Structure & The Next Cycle The crypto market is entering a completely different phase. While previous cycles were driven primarily by speculation, liquidity, and price volatility, the market structure is now undergoing a significant shift with the increasing involvement of financial institutions, businesses, and traditional capital flows. In the Crypto …
#Bitcoin is currently in a cyclical consolidation phase. In most previous cycles, the drawdown hit a local peak and rebounded strongly, followed shortly after by a breakout. However, compared to previous cycles, this drawdown has not yet reached the extreme levels often seen in the capitulation phases at the end of the cycle. Currently, #Bitcoin has moved away from its ATH (Average High) and undergone a significant…
On-chain analysis week 37/2026: Valuation is returning to Bitcoin Bitcoin has broken out of the trading range it has maintained since the end of August and is now trading below the True Market Mean; however, the correction remains relatively limited compared to the unfavorable macroeconomic factors and capital flows. Market Summary Bitcoin has lost the True Market Mean (TMM), while the correction remains relativel…
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @HoldcoinCventure. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HCCVenture || HOLD Coin CVenture” (@HoldcoinCventure), 21,419 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HoldcoinCventure.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.