Channel
@HoldcoinCventure
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17,765subscribers
+5,222 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002144819991 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HoldcoinCventure |
| Created | Between 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HoldcoinCventure |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 17,765 | -126 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 17,891 | -151 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:33 | 18,042 | -281 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 18,323 | -326 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 18,649 | -365 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 19,014 | -482 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 19,496 | -544 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 20,040 | +9,572 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 10,468 | -5,167 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 15,635 | -888 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 16,523 | -395 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:49 | 16,918 | +4,505 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 12,413 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 12,431 | -27 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 12,458 | -58 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 12,516 | -6,392 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 18,908 | -195 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 19,103 | -437 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 19,540 | +4,860 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 14,680 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (17 July 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,421 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
The analysis of credit leverage in the crypto market shows a gradual and controlled decrease The crypto market is entering a phase of systemic delevuring, but it doesn't yet have the characteristics of a credit crisis . Market Overview The total size of lending in the crypto-backed cryptocurrency market decreased by $11.33 billion, or 16.78%, to $56.16 billion . This marks the third consecutive year of declining l…
On-chain analysis week 35/2026: Bitcoin enters the sprint race The digital asset market is entering a phase of significant change in terms of capital flow structure, legal conditions, and the quality of demand , with Bitcoin defining a new global financial structure. Market Summary Following a sharp correction in the first half of 2026, Bitcoin recovered from the $60,000-$65,000 range to near $80,000, while many o…
CME participation data is signaling something noteworthy regarding the quality of the Bitcoin trend. The Participation Index Average Z-Score dropped from above 3 at the end of 2024 to around 0 by mid-2026, even as BTC held steady in the $60,000–$65,000 range. From a cyclical perspective, this does not necessarily signal a deep decline for Bitcoin. Instead, it indicates that the current upward momentum lacks confirm…
On-chain analysis week 33/2026: Bitcoin in a new financial lifeline Bitcoin shows a particularly volatile market state where price fluctuations have sharply declined while the long-term supply-demand structure continues to be reshaped ; the current market has not yet formed a full-blown capitulation cycle. Market Summary ⁃ Coldcard security incident triggered a sharp increase in old BTC supply movement, with tota…
On-chain analysis week 32/2026: Bitcoin from an on-chain quantitative perspective Bitcoin is entering a decisive phase of its cycle as institutional capital returns, but short-term supply pressure remains. Bitcoin has seen a significant improvement in market sentiment as selling pressure from speculative positions gradually weakens and institutional capital begins to return. Market Summary ⁃ Bitcoin market sentim…
On-chain analysis week 31/2026: Ethereum is showing the longest-term opportunity. Ethereum is undergoing one of its biggest corrections since its bull cycle, with institutional profit-taking and continued tight monetary policy causing a sharp drop in ETH price. Market Summary Amidst a correction phase in the cryptocurrency market following a strong growth cycle, Ethereum continues to be one of the most fundamental…
Crypto & Blockchain Venture Capital Flows Report – 2026 Venture Capital (VC) flows updated to Q3/2026 show that VC investment activity continues to maintain a positive state after the recovery phase that began in 2024, with current disbursement levels far exceeding the market bottom. Report Summary • Total venture capital (VC) investment fell by nearly 50% quarter-over-quarter, yet the number of deals dropped by …
Bitcoin has fallen by more than 50%, but on-chain data suggests the market may not yet have bottomed out. In all three previous bear markets, Bitcoin bottomed out when the price traded below the Realized Price and significantly discounted from the 200-week moving average (200W MA). - This is the capitulation zone, where most investors fell into unrealized losses. The current cycle is different. Despite correcting …
Bitcoin has yet to enter a period of extreme euphoria. The Bitcoin Cycle Extremes Index is currently at around 42.5%, reflecting a neutrally positive market. The index has recovered strongly after a correction phase but remains significantly below the 50–60% range, which is typically seen at historical cycle peaks. Notably, despite Bitcoin establishing a new all-time high (ATH), combined signals from on-chain, inve…
On-chain analysis week 30/2026: The quiet actions of veteran whales Following a recovery from below $58,000 to test $65,000, although the downtrend has been halted, the upward momentum is still not strong enough to create a new breakout trend as spot liquidity remains low. Market Summary One of the most important indicators comes from the Net Unrealized Profit (NUP) index . Bitcoin's NUP reached 0.358 while the pr…
Bitcoin needs more capital to generate smaller price increases. The 2011–2013 cycle only required about $2.8 billion in realized capital to generate a gain of over 55,000%. In the current cycle, the market has absorbed nearly $700 billion in new capital, but the price increase has only been around 689%. This is a clear manifestation of the law of diminishing marginal returns. As market capitalization and liquidity …
Press Release No. 012026TC-HCCVenture Regarding Compliance with Legal Regulations and Operational Directions of HCCVenture July 17, 2026 HCCVenture always prioritizes the rule of law, transparency, and sustainable development as the foundation of all its business operations. In the spirit of complying with Vietnamese laws, including new regulations related to the cryptocurrency market, HCCVenture officially announ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @HoldcoinCventure. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HCCVenture || HOLD Coin CVenture” (@HoldcoinCventure), 17,765 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HoldcoinCventure.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.