Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ходасевич LIVE

@HodasevichLive

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

4,092subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001211018054
TypeChannel
Username@HodasevichLive
Created9 July 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/HodasevichLive

Growth

4,0924,1024,0976 August 2026 — 4,102 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,102 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,101 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,092 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,091–4,104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 15:124,092-9
6 Aug 2026, 23:344,101-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:454,102no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:564,102first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,632 reactions across 20 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥44327.1%
👍31519.3%
29818.3%
👏18011.0%
😁1207.35%
😢1006.13%
🙏311.90%
😐171.04%
🤡171.04%
🤔140.858%
💩130.797%
🤗100.613%
👎90.551%
🥴90.551%
80.49%
🐳80.49%
❤‍🔥70.429%
💯60.368%
😱60.368%
🎉50.306%
7 further kinds160.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,632reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2025 to 29 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2025, 08:02 UTC≈10,900 views151 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Главный вывод еврокубковой кампании 2025 года - Беларусь вернула 4 клуба. Это будет в 2027 году. И это сделал Неман. Все остальное - нюансы. https://t.me/belarus_football/43881

70👏41👍24👎9💯6🐳1

28 Aug 2025, 19:54 UTC≈9,510 views161 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Четыре на дорогу домой. Бывает, это уже не суть. Неман дал славную охоту и показал себе и всем клубам Беларуси - играть можно даже при нынешнем положении дел по качеству составов/финансам в чемпионате. Но надо быть готовым к еврокубкам - а это было понятно всегда. По 10-бальной шкале какую оценку поставите Гродно за еврокубки?

👍13212💩7🥴5🐳4👌1

28 Aug 2025, 19:32 UTC≈8,060 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Два пустили уже залпом. Ударов в створ - ноль. Момент из первого тайма помним, но на гол Неман наиграет-таки?

😢23🤗10😱6😭3

28 Aug 2025, 13:45 UTC≈6,410 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну, какие ожидания? Могут зайти на камбэк игроки Немана? Ну, а почему бы и нет в теории? Может получить трешку на дорожку домой? И такое может быть. Еще хуже для зрителя - проза. Как в первом матче - и моменты нереализованные, и интриги нет. Не склонен к оптимизму. Да, у Райо будет второй состав, а впереди Барселона. Да, поле там в плохом состоянии, но оно одинаково для двух сторон. Да, Неман заряжен показать себя

28🤡85😁4🤔3

28 Aug 2025, 06:10 UTC≈4,950 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Ждете сегодня матча Райо - Неман?

  1. Конечно!63%
  2. Узнаю счет23%
  3. Уже не интересно14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍20😁7🤮2🙏2🏆1

21 Aug 2025, 19:57 UTC≈7,120 views121 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В теории до матча - могло быть хуже. Забей Сучков в дебюте второго тайма - могло быть интереснее. Важно - взрослая ментальность у Немана. Через неделю праздник футбола в Мадриде. Летний променад Гродно - уже респект!

👏9612😁6😢6🐳1

21 Aug 2025, 19:37 UTC≈6,110 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Все-таки пропустил Неман. https://t.me/pressallby/23724

😢32😁6👏4🐳21

21 Aug 2025, 07:01 UTC≈5,860 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Ох, вечер грядет!

  1. Неман победа28%
  2. Ничья23%
  3. Райо Вальекано победа49%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8😁3👏2

15 Aug 2025, 07:13 UTC≈9,680 views150 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

2,125 балла - уже заработано в этом сезоне клубами Беларуси. Неман уже получит в районе 1,5 млн евро. Не очень понимаю, сколько тратится на проживание месяцами в Европе, перелеты + пацанам наверняка положены хорошие премиальные. Но клуб в плюсе должен остаться. Кто в игре из соперников вокруг? У этих стран по одному представителю еще: Сан-Марино Гибралтар Северная Македония Люксембург Северная Ирландия Это к тому,

88🔥35👍233🤮1

15 Aug 2025, 06:42 UTC≈6,900 views87 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Есть еще яркие победы в футболе. Почитал ваши каменты. Да, Фареры то се, любители, так и должно быть, а мы что за последние 10 лет - на взлет идем? https://t.me/fcneman/15334

🔥75👍6🏆41💩1

14 Aug 2025, 20:49 UTC≈6,300 views277 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пенальти в пользу Немана и выход в плей-офф Лиги конференций! Уау. Райо Вальекано дальше.

🔥23720👍8❤‍🔥7👏3💩2

14 Aug 2025, 19:44 UTC≈5,760 views110 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А Неман тащит камбэк! 2:0! https://t.me/pressallby/23617

🔥76👏265💩3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HodasevichLive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2025, 06:10 UTCAnonymous Poll1,100 voters approx.

Ждете сегодня матча Райо - Неман?

  1. Конечно!63%
  2. Узнаю счет23%
  3. Уже не интересно14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Aug 2025, 07:01 UTCAnonymous Poll1,340 voters approx.

Ох, вечер грядет!

  1. Неман победа28%
  2. Ничья23%
  3. Райо Вальекано победа49%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2025, 09:28 UTCAnonymous Poll1,150 voters approx.

Итак, сегодня ждем камбэк?

  1. Да, проход Немана!39%
  2. Будет победа без прохода Немана22%
  3. Ничейка и домой23%
  4. Снова поражение15%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2025, 08:10 UTCAnonymous Poll1,150 voters approx.

Итак, что ждем сегодня?

  1. Клаксвик - победа21%
  2. Ничья26%
  3. Неман - победа53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2025 to 29 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q114334864 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelNikolay Khodasevich
DescriptionBelarusian TV presenter, journalist, video blogger
YouTubeUCpsmVuwH-c5yOSD1XuVoH_g

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ходасевич LIVE” (@HodasevichLive), 4,092 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HodasevichLive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.