Channel
@HistoriaProhibidaES
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,050subscribers
+138 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002381672862 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HistoriaProhibidaES |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HistoriaProhibidaES |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
2,940 average views per post against 2,050 subscribers — an engagement rate of 143.5%. Across the 1,109 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,158 subscribers, posting mainly in Spanish — the middle half sit between 7.89% and 30.8%, with a median of 16.0%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 17 of 17 published in the window (2 exact, 15 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 49,998 |
| Mature posts only | 151.1% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 2,050 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:spa · 1,109 channels · p10 3.84% · p25 7.89% · p50 16.0% · p75 30.8% · p90 47.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.458th percentile · 9.0× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.143% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Spanish · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 2,050 | +128 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 1,922 | +10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 1,912 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (23 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 49,998 |
| Reactions total | 615 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
615 reactions across 17 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 357 | 58.0% | |
| 👍 | 121 | 19.7% | |
| 🤔 | 45 | 7.32% | |
| 🤓 | 21 | 3.41% | |
| 😱 | 14 | 2.28% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 1.14% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 1.14% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 1.14% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 0.813% | |
| 😘 | 5 | 0.813% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.65% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 0.488% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 0.488% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.488% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.325% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.325% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.325% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.163% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.163% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 0.163% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 0.65% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 615reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Es difícil imaginar que todos los pueblos pudieran llegar a unirse alguna vez sin conflictos políticos, guerras y cosas por el estilo. Sin embargo, los hechos del pasado demuestran, como mínimo, que las civilizaciones de distintos continentes se intercambiaron tecnología y diferentes estructuras Por ejemplo, hay pirámides y dólmenes de finalidad desconocida por todo el mundo. En casi todas partes del mundo se obser…
👍14❤6🤓1🤯1
En la localidad peruana de Cumbe Mayo se encuentran las ruinas de un canal insólito construido en el año 1500 a. C. Aunque en la región no había problemas de agua, los incas excavaron en la roca un canal de 8 km de longitud. La forma del canal es un misterio: ángulos rectos de 90 grados con paredes lisas y curvas suaves y pulidas. Da la sensación de que la piedra se talló como si fuera un cortapastas. No hay ninguna…
❤18👍5
Los trilitos son tres piedras gigantes situadas en el muro del Templo de Júpiter en Baalbek. Los bloques miden siete metros de altura y cada uno pesa entre 900 y 1.000 toneladas aproximadamente. La burocracia romana documentaba minuciosamente cualquier obra de construcción, pero no se han encontrado datos sobre la extracción ni el transporte de bloques de este tamaño. Simplemente, no existían los medios técnicos par…
👍25❤7
¿Crees que el estrato cultural es de origen reciente? En un grabado del siglo XIX, los italianos tenían una columna en medio de la plaza; nadie sabía de dónde procedía y unos italianos curiosos decidieron comprobar si la columna tenía cimientos. La excavaron. Y resultó que no se trataba en absoluto de los cimientos, sino de que parte del monumento simplemente estaba enterrada. En el grabado aparecen personas y es as…
❤21👍4
Artefacto antiguo procedente de una colección privada Este anillo formó parte durante mucho tiempo de la colección privada de los duques de Marlborough. Imagínate cuántos artefactos como este yacen en silencio bajo su custodia. Se cree que es el anillo del emperador romano Calígula y tiene al menos 2.000 años de antigüedad. Lo más interesante es su elaboración. El zafiro es muy duro y trabajarlo es una tarea ardua.…
❤26👍3
Tallas perfectas Las columnas del complejo del templo de Shravanbelagol (India) demuestran claramente el gran dominio técnico de los antiguos artesanos. El templo se construyó en un tiempo récord en el siglo X. Los científicos no pueden responder a la pregunta de cómo se crearon las columnas talladas y por qué se conservan en perfecto estado hasta el día de hoy, ya que, sin tornos ni fresadoras, es sencillamente im…
❤20👍10🤓3
En los mapas de hace 600 años, la Antártida aparece sin la capa de hielo, aunque oficialmente la Antártida se descubrió hace 200 años. Aunque los mapas fueron tachados inmediatamente de ficticios, es fácil localizar el punto deseado y orientarse sobre el terreno. Compara la coincidencia de las líneas costeras «en la ficción». Únete: @HistoriaProhibidaES ✅
❤23🤓12😁5👀1
«La columna flotante». En la India, en uno de los antiguos templos llamados Lepakshi, hay casi un centenar de columnas talladas e increíbles, pero solo una de ellas rompe todas las leyes de la física. La llamada «columna flotante», de granito, no toca el suelo con su base. Son unos 6 metros y más de cien toneladas suspendidas del techo, lo que en teoría es imposible, pero, al parecer, los antiguos constructores pen…
❤35👍4🤓3
¿Cómo era el interior de los trenes de los siglos XVIII y XIX? Se aprecia de inmediato el gusto de la gente por el estilo y el diseño de interiores. Únete: @HistoriaProhibidaES ✅
❤32👍7👎2
En la antigua cultura china de Hongshan se han hallado figurillas de jade que representan máquinas voladoras similares a las motos acuáticas modernas. Entre las culturas antiguas, es habitual encontrar relatos sobre personas que vuelan en máquinas voladoras. ¿Existen demasiadas coincidencias entre pueblos antiguos tan distantes entre sí? Únete: @HistoriaProhibidaES ✅
❤15👍11🥰7🆒2🤔1
En la necrópolis israelí de Beth Shearim, durante los trabajos de limpieza, se encontró una enorme losa rectangular de 2 x 3,5 m, 50 cm de grosor, con un peso aproximado de 9 toneladas y una antigüedad de 1.600 años. Los análisis de laboratorio revelaron que la losa de Beth Shearim estaba hecha de vidrio. Se trata de un descubrimiento asombroso, ya que fabricar una losa de este tamaño requeriría 11 toneladas de mate…
❤18😱14🔥2🤓2
El hallazgo de un suelo de mosaico, que data del siglo IV d. C., en la ciudad de Rastan, provincia de Homs, Siria. La superficie de la parte descubierta del mosaico asciende hasta ahora a 120 metros cuadrados, y se trata de la novena obra de este tipo descubierta en esta ciudad. Cabe destacar que este suelo no se encuentra simplemente bajo tierra, sino a una profundidad de unos 4 metros, bajo la «capa cultural». Ún…
❤17🤔4🥱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @HistoriaProhibidaES. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 912,207 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Historia Prohibida 🇪🇸” (@HistoriaProhibidaES), 2,050 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HistoriaProhibidaES.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.