Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HimanshuKhatriIRS

Channel

HimanshuKhatriIRS

@HimanshuKhatriUPSC

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,162subscribers

+1,358 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001704847212
TypeChannel
Username@HimanshuKhatriUPSC
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/HimanshuKhatriUPSC

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,80414,16213,4837 August 2026 — 12,804 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,808 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,822 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,841 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,840 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,843 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,835 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,893 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,919 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,939 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,950 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,968 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,982 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,998 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,022 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,026 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,022 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,026 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,029 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,030 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,039 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,044 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,050 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,063 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,117 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,141 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,149 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,159 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,171 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,162 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,358. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,600–14,366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:4014,162+991
16 Sept 2026, 10:1613,171+12
14 Sept 2026, 17:5713,159+10
13 Sept 2026, 03:3813,149+8
11 Sept 2026, 04:2013,141+24
8 Sept 2026, 08:3813,117+54
5 Sept 2026, 02:1413,063+13
3 Sept 2026, 08:3913,050+6
2 Sept 2026, 02:3813,044+5
31 Aug 2026, 02:5413,039+9
28 Aug 2026, 10:5613,030+1
27 Aug 2026, 12:1213,029+3
26 Aug 2026, 12:5313,026+4
25 Aug 2026, 10:0913,022-4
24 Aug 2026, 09:1913,026+4
22 Aug 2026, 17:4513,022+24
21 Aug 2026, 04:5712,998+16
20 Aug 2026, 01:3612,982+14
18 Aug 2026, 22:0612,968+18
17 Aug 2026, 18:4712,950first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.0%
avg views ÷ 14,162 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,380
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.561%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 68 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held68 (28 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total74,540
Reactions total418
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,135 reactions across 67 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,50470.4%
🫡23110.8%
😁1115.20%
👍874.07%
🔥874.07%
🙏663.09%
💯170.796%
🥰150.703%
😍140.656%
👏30.141%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC≈2,620 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

ATTENTION: Option a and d In UPSC two options aint synonyms. So whats the difference between a and d. Opposition = ideological opposition and/or actually fighting against Native Rulers. WEMC ideologically opposed the 1857 revolt but did not fight against Native Rulers = Opposition Those booklets which publish answer keys as UPSC ans = authors answer.

14🔥2

30 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC≈3,130 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

All mails have been responded , barring two, hence could not get time to respond here.

8

29 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈3,540 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/iAu_BGItIFE?si=7pEYCYzuEn1xAVeP

7

28 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈4,360 views43 reactionsread 2 September 2026

As i promised. So here is the reply. Her reaction was like she got totally confused when i asked her if it was patriarchal and i had to like explain thrice

29😁14

27 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC≈5,300 views195 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Am not into wishing festivals as such but its not that i mind wishing. Hence Belated Happy Eid. Happy Raksha Bandhan to all. (i am not Patronising you all, neither i consider you weak. Standing for each other is what this festival is all about. Ultra feminists can write what they want. Am super happy that my sister, who must have internalised patriarchy as per pseudo feminists (pseudo in my view as all have right t

170🔥17👍4😍4

25 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈5,450 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Sample Plan of a student. The best part of this planner is that its best mix of structure and freedom. Even if you do not study a subject for long, no worries its days are allocated . Use it for clearing your backlogs or for revision.

20

25 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈5,190 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Anyone has read the magazine how is the feedback (genuine waala)

7

25 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC≈5,340 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/XZidjM2-GMk?si=Ei1uv8wCjJZ9H5kB

1

25 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC≈5,060 views34 reactionsread 2 September 2026

At times students have doubts related to this. LASIK is permitted for both CAPF and IPS, but surgery alone does not guarantee selection. LASIK helps only when the problem is refractive power. It does not correct colour blindness, night blindness, squint, lazy eye or retinal disease. For CAPF after LASIK Your age should be between 18 and 35 years. LASIK must be completed at least 6 months before the recruitment medi

24🙏10

24 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC≈3,860 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @SarrthiMentorshipPhoto

FINALLY! 🔥 The wait for the MOST CREDIBLE FREE Current Affairs Magazine is OVER! You asked. We delivered. 🙌 Sarrthi IAS July Monthly Current Affairs Magazine is now available for FREE! All you need to do: 1️⃣ Download the Sarrthi IAS App 📱 Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=co.lazarus.nplal 🍎 iOS: App Store Link - https://apps.apple.com/in/app/sarrthiias/id6498897942 2️⃣ Open the App 3️⃣ Go

22🔥2🫡1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @HimanshuKhatriUPSC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dr. Ravi P. Agrahari (Official)
@drravipagrahari · 30,140
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 7 September 2026
Drishti SSC
@drishtisscofficial · 37,612
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
GAT with amit sharma adda247
@amitsharmaadda247 · 22,113
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 21 September 2026
UPSC Polity PSIR Notes
@UPSC_Polity_PSIR_Notes · 34,145
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 3 September 2026
Sunya IAS - Sociology
@sociology_sunyaias · 25,647
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
Study With Arpita Sharma
@ArpitaSharma · 28,043
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HimanshuKhatriIRS” (@HimanshuKhatriUPSC), 14,162 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HimanshuKhatriUPSC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.