Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,358. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,600–14,366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 19:40
14,162
+991
16 Sept 2026, 10:16
13,171
+12
14 Sept 2026, 17:57
13,159
+10
13 Sept 2026, 03:38
13,149
+8
11 Sept 2026, 04:20
13,141
+24
8 Sept 2026, 08:38
13,117
+54
5 Sept 2026, 02:14
13,063
+13
3 Sept 2026, 08:39
13,050
+6
2 Sept 2026, 02:38
13,044
+5
31 Aug 2026, 02:54
13,039
+9
28 Aug 2026, 10:56
13,030
+1
27 Aug 2026, 12:12
13,029
+3
26 Aug 2026, 12:53
13,026
+4
25 Aug 2026, 10:09
13,022
-4
24 Aug 2026, 09:19
13,026
+4
22 Aug 2026, 17:45
13,022
+24
21 Aug 2026, 04:57
12,998
+16
20 Aug 2026, 01:36
12,982
+14
18 Aug 2026, 22:06
12,968
+18
17 Aug 2026, 18:47
12,950
first reading
Engagement
68 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.0%
avg views ÷ 14,162 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,380
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.561%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 68 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
68 (28 July 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
74,540
Reactions total
418
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,135 reactions across 67 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,504
70.4%
🫡
231
10.8%
😁
111
5.20%
👍
87
4.07%
🔥
87
4.07%
🙏
66
3.09%
💯
17
0.796%
🥰
15
0.703%
😍
14
0.656%
👏
3
0.141%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ATTENTION:
Option a and d
In UPSC two options aint synonyms.
So whats the difference between a and d.
Opposition = ideological opposition and/or actually fighting against Native Rulers.
WEMC ideologically opposed the 1857 revolt but did not fight against Native Rulers = Opposition
Those booklets which publish answer keys as UPSC ans = authors answer.
As i promised. So here is the reply.
Her reaction was like she got totally confused when i asked her if it was patriarchal and i had to like explain thrice
Am not into wishing festivals as such but its not that i mind wishing.
Hence
Belated Happy Eid.
Happy Raksha Bandhan to all.
(i am not Patronising you all, neither i consider you weak.
Standing for each other is what this festival is all about.
Ultra feminists can write what they want.
Am super happy that my sister, who must have internalised patriarchy as per pseudo feminists (pseudo in my view as all have right t…
Sample Plan of a student. The best part of this planner is that its best mix of structure and freedom. Even if you do not study a subject for long, no worries its days are allocated . Use it for clearing your backlogs or for revision.
At times students have doubts related to this.
LASIK is permitted for both CAPF and IPS, but surgery alone does not guarantee selection.
LASIK helps only when the problem is refractive power. It does not correct colour blindness, night blindness, squint, lazy eye or retinal disease.
For CAPF after LASIK
Your age should be between 18 and 35 years.
LASIK must be completed at least 6 months before the recruitment medi…
FINALLY! 🔥
The wait for the MOST CREDIBLE FREE Current Affairs Magazine is OVER!
You asked. We delivered.
🙌
Sarrthi IAS July Monthly Current Affairs Magazine is now available for FREE!
All you need to do:
1️⃣ Download the Sarrthi IAS App
📱 Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=co.lazarus.nplal
🍎 iOS: App Store Link - https://apps.apple.com/in/app/sarrthiias/id6498897942
2️⃣ Open the App
3️⃣ Go…
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @HimanshuKhatriUPSC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dr. Ravi P. Agrahari (Official) @drravipagrahari · 30,140 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 7 September 2026
Drishti SSC @drishtisscofficial · 37,612 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
GAT with amit sharma adda247 @amitsharmaadda247 · 22,113 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 21 September 2026
UPSC Polity PSIR Notes @UPSC_Polity_PSIR_Notes · 34,145 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 3 September 2026
Sunya IAS - Sociology @sociology_sunyaias · 25,647 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
Study With Arpita Sharma @ArpitaSharma · 28,043 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HimanshuKhatriIRS” (@HimanshuKhatriUPSC), 14,162 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HimanshuKhatriUPSC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.