Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for "Скрывшийся Мир". СПЕЦИАЛИСТ.

Channel

"Скрывшийся Мир". СПЕЦИАЛИСТ.

@Hiddenworld11

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,206subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002260737607
TypeChannel
Username@Hiddenworld11
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Hiddenworld11

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1726,2376,204.57 August 2026 — 6,227 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,228 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,227 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,223 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,213 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,214 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,208 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,201 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,204 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,203 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,200 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,186 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,172 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,237 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,234 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,230 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,228 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,227 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,226 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,224 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,225 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,215 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,208 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,206 subscribers6,2067 August 20268 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 93 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,162–6,247 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 07:486,206-2
5 Nov 2026, 01:586,208-7
2 Nov 2026, 03:306,215-10
30 Oct 2026, 12:156,225+1
27 Oct 2026, 22:066,224-2
24 Oct 2026, 18:116,226-1
21 Oct 2026, 20:496,227-1
19 Oct 2026, 02:376,228-2
16 Oct 2026, 02:066,230-4
6 Oct 2026, 16:156,234-3
29 Sept 2026, 09:006,237+65
15 Sept 2026, 22:016,172-14
11 Sept 2026, 21:186,186-14
7 Sept 2026, 19:176,200-3
2 Sept 2026, 09:136,203-1
30 Aug 2026, 11:356,204+3
27 Aug 2026, 10:266,201-7
24 Aug 2026, 05:546,208-6
20 Aug 2026, 17:246,214+1
17 Aug 2026, 16:566,213first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.6%
avg views ÷ 6,206 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held33 (7 March 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total3,430
Reactions total138
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38m 27s
Average length
3m 51s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,087 reactions across 33 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤46222.1%
👍35116.8%
🔥27713.3%
💯23711.4%
🤔21410.3%
😁1949.30%
🤯552.64%
🙈482.30%
🤣482.30%
😱321.53%
🙉321.53%
⚡281.34%
👏251.20%
👀221.05%
👌120.575%
🙊80.383%
✍60.287%
🥰60.287%
🌭50.24%
🕊40.192%
11 further kinds211.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,087 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 10:12 UTC≈1,140 views82 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @staraya

Наша постоянная рубрика "Перспективы здравоохранения". «Лечение бараном» может быть включено в реестр культурного достояния России. На основании заключения экспертного совета министерство культуры Иркутской области примет решение о включении обряда, как объекта нематериального культурного наследия в региональный реестр, а также направит предложения о включении в Федеральный государственный реестр объектов нематери…

🙉22💯21😁11❤8👍5🤯5🙈4😱3

30 Oct 2026, 13:31 UTC≈2,290 views56 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Как вы могли уже понять, концепция ИНЬ не является тем, чем выдает за себя. Идея ЯН и ИНЬ и якобы их баланса и перетекания одного в другое на первый взгляд выглядит первоклассно. Но, это только на первый взгляд, ведь НАУКА отрицает ее)). Перетекание одного в другое возможно, но только где? Точнее сказать, в чем? Для этого нужен какой-либо Сосуд, точнее нужна ЗАМКНУТАЯ СИСТЕМА, где не происходит никакая утечка ВОВНЕ. …

👍27❤17🤔9🌭2🔥1

20 Sept 2026, 15:33 UTC≈4,770 views59 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Мы пытаемся понять и объяснить самым доступным и наилучшим способом древнюю концепцию ИНЬ - ЯН. Ведь дело в том, что даже древние дошедшие до нас трактовки этой теории даосов выглядят как сознательно частично искажённая картина Мироосознания. С одной стороны мастера дао постулируют, что вся истинная юань ЦИ в телах людей, имеет качество только ЯН. Причем скорее всего и в телах и мужчин и женщин.. Запомним это. Во вто…

❤20👍17🔥10🤔10🤝1😁1

15 Sept 2026, 15:48 UTC≈4,780 views52 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Удивительное дело, начав писать посты про ИНЬ-ЯН мы использовали материал лекций даоса, официального мастера Школы --- Мэй Мошэня. Нам показалось, что для базового анализа этого будет достаточно и степень компетентности источника ПЕРЕДАЧИ знаний не потребует дальнейших подтверждений . И в принципе мы оказались правы. Мастер Мэй вполне оправдал наши ожидания. Он доносит до зрителей ровно то, что нужно понять про Дао. …

👍25❤15🔥11🥰1

11 Sept 2026, 12:53 UTC≈4,180 views43 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Мы уже ознакомились с базовыми понятиями, используемыми даосом мастером Мэй, ну ознакомились скорее все, кто хотел и кто успел.. Кто ещё не успел, всегда может это сделать на канале Бронислава Виногродского, в разделе Плейлисты, папка Лекции.. Что ещё нужно попробовать понять как базовые понятия? Интересен концепт линии сопряжения между ИНЬ-ЯН. Мастер, на взгляд АДМИНА, сознательно не стал раскрывать в видео правильн…

❤17👍15✍6🤔5

10 Sept 2026, 11:24 UTC≈3,660 views41 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Очень прямо хочется сделать небольшой обзор некоторых интересных моментов с первых часов лекции по ДАО. Во первых хочется отметить буквально все цитаты, которыми Мастер Мэй Мошэнь обозначает изначальную юань Ци, которой награждают ребенка родители. Давайте попробуем всё перечислить по порядку: "истинная сила дыхания, яньская ци, ци правды, "правильная сила" дыхания или дыхание правды. Это все одно и тоже. Это все в с…

❤20👍11👏4🤣4🌭1🤨1

10 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC≈3,400 views39 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Вот такое получилось краткое описание СИСТЕМЫ. Вы можете самостоятельно поискать материалы, опросить разные ИИ. Вы наверное получите массу предположений и веселых выдумок ИИ. За исключением ОДНОГО Верного, почему мы должны верить в то, что у борьбы противоположностей есть единство? Ведь очевидно, что если "какое Царство разделится в себе, то оно не устоит и погибнет". Есть даже лекции Мастера ДАО практикующего цигун …

🔥20❤14🤔5

10 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC≈3,230 views40 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Мы постоянно вынуждены смотреть, что же происходит в головах так называемых ченеллеров в "МОМЕНТ ПЕРЕХОДА". Нам казалось одно время, что эти якобы самоназванные "светлые", нет люди перестанут наконец ВРАТЬ и наваливать кринжа в голову своим особо доверчивым слушателям. Но нет, все по прежнему, враньё льется нескончаемрй рекой, хотя частички правды там теперь и правда чаще попадаются. К чему такое предисловие. Мы давн…

❤32👍7🔥1

10 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC≈3,320 views29 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Итак, система ДАО воплощённая в концепте ИНЬ-ЯНЬ. В принципе многие знают, что ИНЬ это условное женское начало, а ЯНЬ - мужское. Ну хорошо, разобрались, вот Женское, вот мужское, все стало понятно. Объединение их, по Мысли основоположника ДАО Лао Цзы, "рождает" дао, как в микромире практикующего человека, так и в реальной жизни, понимая под ДАО рождение как бы из малозначительных биокомпонентов нового Существа - Ребе…

❤22🤔5💯2

10 Sept 2026, 07:49 UTC≈3,270 views42 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Сегодня, 10.09 мы начинаем делать репост материалов, посвященных Дао ИНЬ–ЯН с канала "Свет Вод". Мы считаем этот материал достаточно полезным и расширяющим ваш кругозор. В данных постах мы попробовали выйти за Традиционные невидимые Границы этой якобы всем понятной даосской темы про "Единство и борьбу противоположностей, Мужские и Женские Энергии" и взглянуть в общем на всем известный даосский МАТЕРИАЛ максимально ш…

❤36👍6

23 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC≈5,150 views22 reactionsread 6 November 2026

https://vk.ru/wall-91933860_419707

🤔13🙊4❤3😁2

21 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC≈5,720 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026

https://m.vkvideo.ru/video-229931569_456243504

🔥15🤔8❤5👍2💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @Hiddenworld11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“"Скрывшийся Мир". СПЕЦИАЛИСТ.” (@Hiddenworld11), 6,206 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hiddenworld11.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.